[nicknick1]

(Original post by Steevee)
You can't be racist against Muslims, they're not a race.

And no, the EDL are not the NF or C-18. I've been through this many, many times. For one, C-18 and all NAzi groups denounce the EDL as a 'Zionist tool' and infact people on Stormfront labelled them as more dangerous than the likes of the UAF, because they are trying to pursue a public order of Jewry Those crazy Nazis.

Technically Muslim is not a race but we all know that generally speaking Islam goes hand in hand with a race. But so what if people are against the Islamification of Britain. People are against a Chinese takeover of Tibet. If the numbers get bigger, and given the rhetoric of some Islamics who would like that to be the case i.e. a Sharia Britain, What's the difference?

[nicknick1]

(Original post by IRSP044)
Awk Is the wee fascist getting angry.... Aren't you one of those hard fascists like the rest of the EDL, who runs about acting the big lad and chanting like a ****?

Fascists never do accept that they are fascists.

No Pasaran!

What would you prefer Sharia law or rule by people who want to keep Britain British. (The fascists in your book)? I think you should get down on your knees, face Mecca and pray now.

[de_monies]

(Original post by nicknick1)
You need to remember that racism is a very relative term. Someone in a school thought it was a good idea to make a mother of a 7 year old child who asked a schoolmate "Are you brown because you are from Africa?" sign a declaration that the child was a racist.

That's not racist

(Original post by nicknick1)
So when you make statements like 'Racism does not come under freedom of speech.' you need to remember that this can be misused to oppress people like in the former USSR.

So, now saying that someone is racist is oppressing them? Exactly like they did in the USSR?

(Original post by nicknick1)
It is true that there are people with a "white genocide" agenda espousing things like "Western countries should yellow or blend". Whites are reproducing less than non-whites. e.g.

(Original post by nicknick1)
Muslims might rely on the benefits system

Proof? Also, if you look at the population statistics, in every single country across the globe, the birth rate is falling. It is a factor of a developing/developed nation

http://www.google.com/publicdata/exp...en_US&dl=en_US

(Original post by nicknick1)
to support their children but white middle class people will think whether they can afford it. (White chavs excluded).

First, I don't think you're middle class, and secondly fertility rates are directly related to how developed a country is, therefore the population. Poorer people tend to have more children than richer people - even in a country that gives out benefits

(Original post by nicknick1)
It is true that liberals often have agendas and deliver these agendas via. the threat of labelling you as a discriminator if you do not comply.

Firstly, I suppose Im more liberal than you, but Im a centrist. Secondly, have you read some of your posts? There are really conservative people here that have lots of positive rep, yet you have lots of negative rep. Society as a whole (at least on TSR) doesn't like your ideas

(Original post by nicknick1)
It has not to the point where I say “discrimination is good” to combat their lies.

So now you want discrimination?

[blueray]

How were the UAF for pedophilia? All i saw was banners against racism.

[de_monies]

(Original post by Zeffy)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjg91FPzfvU

Must watch video for folks. Anti-racism is anti-white.

Im guessing you made that video, because it hasn't got many views. Any way, I'd like to share something with you




I do like that I am "impinging" on their rights by arguing against the clip

[nicknick1]

(Original post by de_monies)

So now you want discrimination?

In principle I don't want discrimination, but in actual fact, Yes I do want discrimination now, because the issue has been used by people who want to destroy Western culture to emotionally blackmail their opponents. For example mass-immigration, asylum fraud, loss of jobs to foreigners, benefits culture are all destructive to society but protected by the "anti-discrimination" racket. If someone says they want to get rid of benefits for people who can work they are "elitist". If someone says they want British jobs to go to British people then they are "discriminating". If someone says that they don't want "affirmative action" (a P.C. word for giving our country away) then they are "anti-feminist", and the list goes on and on. So called progressives are just flushing our society down the toilet (social decay, crime, poverty, immorality, national debt, free money printing press, mass-immigration, unemployment, bad trade figures, uneducated masses, political correctness, mindless celebritism, politicised police, abuse of the system, unnecessary wars).

Their hook is "You are a discriminator if you say that". Liberals silently hoodwink everyone into their agenda this way, and act apologetic as they covert people and apologetically tell people why this is not possible and that is not possible, until finally their dream is realised an we live in an Islamic state and they can go somewhere else and praise this. So yes for the record "Discrimination is good."

Long Live discrimination. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

[de_monies]

(Original post by nicknick1)
our country away) then they are "anti-feminist", and the list goes on and on. So called progressives are just flushing our society down the toilet (social decay, crime, poverty, immorality, national debt, free money printing press, mass-immigration, unemployment, bad trade figures, uneducated masses, political correctness, mindless celebritism, politicised police, abuse of the system, unnecessary wars).

I CBA arguing with you yet, but I guess that's where you fit in

[A Mysterious Lord]

(Original post by blueray)
How were the UAF for pedophilia? All i saw was banners against racism.

They were protesting against the trial taking place, they allegedly attacked barristers to try to get the case adjourned.

[blueray]

(Original post by A Mysterious Lord)
They were protesting against the trial taking place, they allegedly attacked barristers to try to get the case adjourned.

I thought they were protesting against the edl being there?! That's what they say anyway.

[Carecup]

(Original post by blueray)
I thought they were protesting against the edl being there?! That's what they say anyway.

That's what they were doing there. Of course the couple of EDL member who have brain cells decided to twist this and try and convince people that they in some way supported a pedophile.

[nicknick1]

(Original post by de_monies)
I CBA arguing with you yet, but I guess that's where you fit in

Yes I know you don't like it, because I have figured out how to break your liberal lie and work out your agenda.

[de_monies]

(Original post by nicknick1)
Yes I know you don't like it, because I have figured out how to break your liberal lie and work out your agenda.

Keyword being yet. Ill argue with you when I have more time

[Bonged.]

(Original post by nicknick1)
In principle I don't want discrimination, but in actual fact, Yes I do want discrimination now, because the issue has been used by people who want to destroy Western culture to emotionally blackmail their opponents. For example mass-immigration, asylum fraud, loss of jobs to foreigners, benefits culture are all destructive to society but protected by the "anti-discrimination" racket. If someone says they want to get rid of benefits for people who can work they are "elitist". If someone says they want British jobs to go to British people then they are "discriminating". If someone says that they don't want "affirmative action" (a P.C. word for giving our country away) then they are "anti-feminist", and the list goes on and on. So called progressives are just flushing our society down the toilet (social decay, crime, poverty, immorality, national debt, free money printing press, mass-immigration, unemployment, bad trade figures, uneducated masses, political correctness, mindless celebritism, politicised police, abuse of the system, unnecessary wars).

Their hook is "You are a discriminator if you say that". Liberals silently hoodwink everyone into their agenda this way, and act apologetic as they covert people and apologetically tell people why this is not possible and that is not possible, until finally their dream is realised an we live in an Islamic state and they can go somewhere else and praise this. So yes for the record "Discrimination is good."

Long Live discrimination. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

the liberal order articulates the world through a "script" in which there are three characters: the white liberal, who embodies the non-discriminatory virtue of the liberal regime; the white non-liberal, who discriminates against nonwhites and who must be crushed by the white liberal; and the nonwhite/non-Westerner, who either is discriminated against by the white non-liberal or is non-discriminatorily included by the white liberal. In the script, furthermore, only the white liberal and the white non-liberal are moral actors, with the first representing good and the second representing evil. The nonwhite/non-Westerner is not a moral actor, but is simply the passive recipient of the white liberal's goodness or of the white non-liberal's bigotry. The reason that the nonwhite/non-Westerner cannot be a moral actor is that his very function in the script is to be the recipient of either good non-discrimination or evil discrimination. If he were a moral actor, then his own actions would have to be judged; specifically, his bad actions would have to be judged. But to judge his bad actions would be to discriminate against him. And since the central purpose of liberalism is to eliminate all discriminatory treatment of nonwhites/non-Westerners, moral judgement of nonwhites/non-Westerners must also be eliminated. Therefore nonwhites/non-Westerners cannot be seen as responsible moral actors.

The liberal script explains why Jones, who burned a piece of paper with ink on it that he owned, has "blood on his hands," but the Muslim Afghan mob that invaded a UN compound and murdered 12 UN employees do not have blood on their hands. The Muslims are not moral actors. The Muslims are simply the victims of Terry Jones's discriminatory act against them. Jones, the white non-liberal, is a moral agent who is responsible for his evil actions. The Muslims are not moral agents and are not responsible for their actions.

(talking about why the florida pastor was responsible for the anti-un massacre)

[GeorgetheAug]

(Original post by nicknick1)
What would you prefer Sharia law or rule by people who want to keep Britain British. (The fascists in your book)? I think you should get down on your knees, face Mecca and pray now.

That's it, keep poking that straw man.
Most of us would prefer to stay on the middle ground where "British" and "Muslim" are not mutually exclusive

[Harley_Quinn]

For the people that keep asking, the UAF were going after barristers to get them acquitted.

[MikeMikeMike666]

(Original post by Harley_Quinn)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUxr7mV-M78

Why haven't these ***** been banned, hating the EDL is no excuse for supporting paedophile.

I can only agree - the UAF have a very confused message!!! I mean who could ever condone fascism and the hate of innocent people and minorities....however they are a band of layabout thugs who will protest against ANY remotely rightwing message - even anti-pedophilia!!!

WORLD GONE MAD!

[MikeMikeMike666]

(Original post by nicknick1)
Yes I know you don't like it, because I have figured out how to break your liberal lie and work out your agenda.

Nicknick as have I! I hate the recent jaded liberal train of thought. I am a fellow member like you who is sick of the liberal standpoint hi-jacking the populist vote. Politicians will always BS you on anything in a scrabble for the loose electorate. Luv it keep going NN1

[GeorgetheAug]

(Original post by MikeMikeMike666)
Nicknick as have I! I hate the recent jaded liberal train of thought. I am a fellow member like you who is sick of the liberal standpoint hi-jacking the populist vote. Politicians will always BS you on anything in a scrabble for the loose electorate. Luv it keep going NN1

Funny how people use the term "Liberal" as an insult when Western civilization is BASED off the idea of Liberty.

[Vintage <3]

Yes.. I think they're just trying too hard to show they support the minorites, they stand for good things but it isn't always very effective. Especially in this case.... But the fact remains they are a hell of a lot better than the EDL and the BNP will ever be.

[GeorgetheAug]

(Original post by MikeMikeMike666)
who will protest against ANY remotely rightwing message - even anti-pedophilia!!!

Again, you keep using these words - I don't think you know what they mean.
For a start, I'd prefer the term "Child Predators" rather than "Pedophiles" as the former refers to people who succumb to their urges and sexually abuse children, as opposed to the latter which is, to all intents and purposes, a form of sexuality. Pedophiles can no more choose to be that way as can Homosexuals or Bisexuals.
Secondly, "Anti-Pedophilia" as you call it is not a "Right wing" message. Firstly, you're saying this as if the "Lefties" or "Liberals" endorse or support pedophilia, presumably using a Straw Man argument by referring to the UAF and generalising it to anyone with an opinion one could consider "Liberal". This is simply not true - Libertarians are not "Pro-Pedophilia".
Secondly "Right Wing" refers to the degree of economic freedom a person believes should be allowed by the government. "Right Wing" refers to those who think the economy should be individual-orientated, in favour of corporations and privatisation allowing people to make as much money as they like. "Left Wing" refers to those who think it should be community-orientated - Taxes, for example, are fundamentally a left-wing idea - The idea that a percentage of all money a person makes should be given to the community or country to benefit everyone and not just themselves. Right- or Left-Wing has nothing to do with Nationalism or Libertarianism - It is purely to do with economy.