Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Why do people say GTA IV sucked?

Announcements Posted on
Become part of the Welcome Squad! Apply here! 28-10-2014
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    It was a class game. Obviously it didn't have the jetpacks and missile launchers that San Andreas had because it was aiming to be a completely different game. It was a more serious game with a whole new level of depth. People expected it to be packed with as much content as SA, but that is unfair to expect considering GTA IV was Rockstar's first game on current consoles.
    I thought GTA IV was just as good as SA and VC, if not better. It just had a different atmosphere that was more realistic and gritty. People complained of a lack of content, but the game actually has plenty of content but you just had to look for it. Things like the in-game TV, internet, cabaret shows etc. If you actually pay attention to those things you realise how much depth there is in there.

    I think the people who hated it are just impatient kids who need a game to have non-stop fireworks and explosions for them to enjoy it.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    My manager loved it. He said it was scary because it was so realistic.

    I still haven't played it yet so can't really comment on it!
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    It's my favourite game of all time.

    It's an utter masterpiece.
    • 5 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I thought it was fantastic.
    Infact, I hope V builds on it rather than reverts to the showy stuff.
    • 12 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I used to love playing it on my brother's xbox!
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I wanted more cheats.

    In San Andreas I could become a obese stripper who flew about with a jet pack setting fire to cities everywhere
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Really a top game. But still not as good as San Andreas imo.

    There was so much freedom in that game, don't know why they didn't stick to making the latest games as similar to it as possible; they were on to a winning formula.
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	v40031_Roman-Bellic-Hey-cousin-Lets-go-bowling.jpg 
Views:	122 
Size:	61.8 KB 
ID:	135757
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    i enjoyed it tooo.
    and i found that both games are equally good. it's just one is more for messing about and doing what you want and the other has a deeper storyline to it. that's all
    • 14 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Its boring.

    Especially the third zone where missions ask you to go from one end of the map to the other then back to listen to some guy.
    • 10 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    People only think it sucked because there was less freedom and fewer side activities than in San Andreas. IMO, it's more plausible and much grittier. You're an illegal immigrant working as a hitman and a gangbanger - rising to the top through a few odd jobs and "wet work", owning the entire city Al Capone style is totally unrealistic.

    I thought it was fantastic and GTA V is a definite must-have, because it immediately strikes me as GTA IV but with some of the more realistic side activities reintroduced.

    The only thing I really didn't like was the constant phonecalls and having to juggle your social life and avoid letting people down. That was boring and I usually disabled that when just messing about in the city on my own.
    • 5 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    i wanted to play it so bad but my computer couldn't run it! it was a proper new, expensive computer at the time... just not a gaming one... from what i played (before getting extremely frustrated with the sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow gameplay and just pressing the off button on my computer each time i attempted to play) it was really fun... not as good as SA but still pretty awesome..
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I think it was a great game. I think that people believe it wasn't that good because when San Andreas came out, it was released with a huge improvement from gta3. People just thought that gta iv didn't have a huge improvement on san Andreas.

    I however loved San Andreas, the storyline with the gangs and everything was so fun.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by like a boss)
    It just had a different atmosphere that was more realistic and gritty.
    Which is great and everything but it came at the expense of fun. On all the other GTA's I could spend hours just driving around creating chaos where as on GTA IV after I'd finished the missions (which were reasonable but lacked any diversity/humour) I found there was very little for me to do. You might say this is just because I'm burned out on the concept but I can still pick up the older GTA's and have more fun than I find possible in 4.

    Neg away but you did ask
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Personally I just didn't like the characters as much as the ones in SA.

    And the music. :awesome:
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    It was a technically brilliant game, I just didn't get the same 'magic' I got from playing San Andreas, I can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's just cos I spent most of my teenage years playing SA?

    I need to revisit the game and play it all the way through though, I bought it on PC and only had an average gaming computer - couldn't run it very well at all. Plus all the bloatware programs that game with the game were a bit annoying to have to deal with.
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Visually it was too dark, compared to SA and VC... imo

    Not anything like the old GTA's which was disappointing for me at the time.

    Its a good game though, but not great imo..
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    some missions did suck tbf, but overall i feel like it was a different take on the game, and just because it was different doesn't mean it's crap.
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    and this is coming from a girls perspective

    EDIT: Why the negative rep?
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    It just wasn't very fun.

    They spent so much time trying to make it perfect that it turned out to be very dull. The city is amazing, it all looks brilliant and plays nicely etc. but there's nothing really to do. The missions take ages to get going and even then they're really dull, especially around the beginning. It doesn't really feel like a game... just a crime simulator lol. Not much to do outside of the missions either... multiplayer is a bit of a laugh but not great.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: February 3, 2013
New on TSR

Halloween 2014

Join the TSR Halloween party...if you dare!

Article updates
Useful resources

Quick link:

Unanswered gaming threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.