Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
x

Unlock these great extras with your FREE membership

  • One-on-one advice about results day and Clearing
  • Free access to our personal statement wizard
  • Customise TSR to suit how you want to use it

[C2] Differentiation - Increasing function

Announcements Posted on
Find your uni forum to get talking to other applicants, existing students and your future course-mates 27-07-2015
Win top prizes in our mega results day giveaway... 24-07-2015
  1. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TenOfThem)
    I agree that there seems to be an unusual element to this definition ... but it has nothing to do with f(x)=0
    IF f(x1) = f(x2) then we have a horizontal line, of course it may be a very very short horizontal line. Is this not the same as saying the gradient is zero.
  2. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by steve2005)
    IF f(x1) = f(x2) then we have a horizontal line, of course it may be a very very short horizontal line. Is this not the same as saying the gradient is zero.
    yes

    which is why I asked if you meant f'(x) rather than f(x)

    Ah ... I see that you have edited the original comment
  3. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by steve2005)
    I think the OP has a point. Obviously, if f'(x) is increasing then it is an increasing function, and if f'(x) is decreasing it is a decreasing function.

    The problem is that when f'(x) is zero it can be classed as an increasing function and a decreasing function. The problem seems that f'(x) equals zero comes in both camps.
    This is why I gave 2 responses to his question

    One response said "no the 2 bits of your definition are not the same"

    Then the second ... the one you quoted ... ignored his odd definition and referred him back to the definition that people had been giving him throughout the thread
  4. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TenOfThem)
    This is why I gave 2 responses to his question

    One response said "no the 2 bits of your definition are not the same"

    Then the second ... the one you quoted ... ignored his odd definition and referred him back to the definition that people had been giving him throughout the thread
    Is the rule that OP gave completely correct or wrong?

    I know that for an increasing function,  f(x_2) > f(x_1) , when  x_2 > x_1

    But does the same applies for  f(x_2)=f(x_1), this means zero gradient so the function is neither increasing nor decreasing.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: March 26, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Poll
Have you got a summer job this year?
Results and Clearing

Results are coming...

No sweat. Here's all you need to make sure you're ready

new on tsr

Cure summer boredom

Bargain games for under £20

Study resources
x

Think you'll be in clearing or adjustment?

Hear direct from unis that want to talk to you

Get email alerts for university course places that match your subjects and grades. Just let us know what you're studying.

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.