Why were many of the de-colonisation conflicts called emergencies?
Discuss issues related to past events, people, places, or old empires and civilisations.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera | 21-05-2013 | |
-
Why were many of the de-colonisation conflicts called emergencies?
can anyone tell me why exactly conflicts such as the Malayan emergency, the Kenyan emergency, the Cyprus emergency, Aden emergency etc. are called 'emergencies'? what separates them from a standard war? i remember someone saying someting about it was to do with insurance and it was to stop Loyds of London from un-insuring their equipment or something similar?
-
Re: Why were many of the de-colonisation conflicts called emergencies?
Very few things are technically a war. Afghanistan and the Falklands were not wars for example since a state of war was never declared.
They could be described as conflicts however war can only be declared on a foreign state, which anti-British rebels are not, plus declaring war is time-consuming and impractical since signing a peace treaty can be impossible (think Korea). -
Re: Why were many of the de-colonisation conflicts called emergencies?
The British government were very careful about labeling things 'wars' in the wake of World War II. And I don't know so much about Kenya, Cyprus, and Aden but the Malayan Emergency was a campaign of 'hearts and minds', it was a very psychological battle, more reliant on propaganda than any physical fighting.