Integration
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Re: Integration(3x+1) =xlog4/log2(Original post by King-Panther)
So, (3x+1)log2 = xlog4
(3x+1) =xlog4/log2
3x+1=2
3x = 1
x = 1/3
??? which isn't right
3x+1=2x
You missed out the 'x'. -
Re: IntegrationAccording to the question,(Original post by King-Panther)
So what does x = 2?

Remove logs,
-
Re: IntegrationConsider(Original post by just george)
24. yes it is true, the first wiki image steve2005 put up states that if
then f has a local maximum at x.
i.e. if the second derivative of f(x) is less than 0 (negative), there is a local maximum.
So clearly all local maximum points will produce a negative second derivative
.
-
Re: Integration2/0.5=4 not 1(Original post by King-Panther)
therefore x =2/0.5
x = 1???
I take I substitute value of x into the equation to get log(0.5) -
- Reputation:
- Thread Starter
- Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
- Location: London
- Posts: 3,710
Re: Integration2/x = 0.5, if you make x the subject, you multiply 2 by .5 ....(Original post by raheem94)
2/0.5=4 not 1
When I sub 4 into the equation logx+log2x+logx^3 i dont get 0.5 -
Re: IntegrationNo, you'd multiply through by x, then divide through by 0.5, so it does equal 4.(Original post by King-Panther)
2/x = 0.5, if you make x the subject, you multiply 2 by .5 .... -
- Reputation:
- Thread Starter
- Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
- Location: London
- Posts: 3,710
Re: Integrationof course, however, when i sub 4 into the equation i dont get 0.5(Original post by Brit_Miller)
No, you'd multiply through by x, then divide through by 0.5, so it does equal 4. -
- Reputation:
- Thread Starter
- Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
- Location: London
- Posts: 3,710
Re: Integrationfor Q)31, i got 8(Original post by Brit_Miller)
No, you'd multiply through by x, then divide through by 0.5, so it does equal 4. -
Re: Integration(Original post by King-Panther)
2/x = 0.5, if you make x the subject, you multiply 2 by .5 ....
When I sub 4 into the equation logx+log2x+logx^3 i dont get 0.5
Your equation was,

-
- Reputation:
- Thread Starter
- Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
- Location: London
- Posts: 3,710
Re: Integrationindeed i could have, thanks.... for 31 is it 8?(Original post by just george)
and for (26) couldnt you just do?






Guess if your happy with laws of logs and things either way is fine, dont know why i chose to do it this way
-
Re: Integrationyes, whats the relevance of your answer though?(Original post by King-Panther)
indeed i could have, thanks.... for 31 is it 8?
edit:
what do you mean? you have(Original post by King-Panther)
also, for 33, what do i do when 3/2x^2, do i multiply 3 by 2x^2 do its 6x^-2
, so to differentiate it you times it by the power, and then take one off the power?
Last edited by just george; 03-04-2012 at 20:03. -
- Reputation:
- Thread Starter
- Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
- Location: London
- Posts: 3,710
Re: IntegrationDy/dx tells us what the gradient is when we at x when we sub it in, d2y/dx2 tells us in which direction its going, its a positive number so its a minimum going in the positive direction? -
- Reputation:
- Thread Starter
- Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
- Location: London
- Posts: 3,710
Re: IntegrationNo, the fraction is(Original post by just george)
yes, whats the relevance of your answer though?
edit:
what do you mean? you have
, so to differentiate it you times it by the power, and then take one off the power?
Last edited by King-Panther; 03-04-2012 at 20:16.