[John Locke]

(Original post by Chief Wiggum)
But then fibres can pass directly from the cochlear nuclei through the lateral lemniscus without synapsing in the superior olive...

Would that not make the 2nd/3rd order definition thing ambiguous?

This is my line of thought, there are several pathways which bypass different 'auditory nuceli' which make to my mind makes the question poor in that even if they do want the thalamic MGB the fact it would be actively punishing a fuller understanding would be ridiculous.

[Ignoramus]

(Original post by Chief Wiggum)
But then fibres can pass directly from the cochlear nuclei through the lateral lemniscus without synapsing in the superior olive...

Would that not make the 2nd/3rd order definition thing ambiguous?

(Original post by John Locke)
This is my line of thought, there are several pathways which bypass different 'auditory nuceli' which make to my mind makes the question poor in that even if they do want the thalamic MGB the fact it would be actively punishing a fuller understanding would be ridiculous.

Ah, I didn't actually know that, heheh. That makes sense, although I guess such questions about pathways will generally refer to the "textbook" versions. >_<

(Original post by John Locke)
.

Are you about to do the FHS, or have you already done it?

[John Locke]

(Original post by Ignoramus)
Are you about to do the FHS, or have you already done it?

I'm in your year so technically 'doing it'.

[Ignoramus]

(Original post by John Locke)
I'm in your year so technically 'doing it'.

Ah nice, what option are you taking?