The Manchester United Thread IX

Football discussion forum.

Announcements Posted on
Please change your TSR password 23-05-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. Welsh Leprecaun's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: Manchester
    • Posts: 2,977
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    Anyone see the GiveMeFootball story on Rooney moving to PSG for £120million. They've already taken it down :teehee:
  2. Simone739's Avatar
    • Junior Member
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 50
    • Warning points: 2
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    Maaaan u all the waaaay!
  3. pol pot noodles's Avatar
    • Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 4,032
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    (Original post by Brainiac)
    Could we get tiote?

    Also can someone explain to me how the glaziers are running the club, why are we short on money? I have heard fans complaining but never had it explained to me, and was relatively young when they took over...
    The Glazers took out massive loans to fund the purchase of Man Utd, which at that point was debt free. Since 2005 they've taken almost £500m out of the club to pay off interest and bond buy backs, yet we still have a debt of £420m.
    Amazingly, since the take over Man Utd has still won four league titles and the champions league, but that's all been down to the hard graft of Sir Alex. Imagine if we didn't have that debt? Since 2005 that's an extra £70m odd a year at our disposal!
  4. Akkuz's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Location: Harry Potter land
    • Posts: 7,435
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    There are a few stories linking us with Modric for ~£30m. That would be epic. :moon:
  5. rohannnnn's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Posts: 316
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    we're also being linked to Adam Johnson, highly doubt City will sell to us though haha
  6. Da_hopeful_1's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    He's rubbish anyway, wouldn't want him at all.
  7. DaveSmith99's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    Do not want.
  8. Spicey's Avatar
    • Respected Member
    • Posts: 154
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    can't wait to see kagawa in action, he's been fantastic at dortmund, hope he will be just as good here or better
  9. Kenan and Kel's Avatar
    • Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    Still think we should've signed De Rossi last year before Roma offered him a new contract
  10. Saf94's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 773
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    Interesting article here, gives stats on the amount of injuries for each team this season. We were top of it with the most injuries, 39 major injuries and 1681 days lost to injuries. And the team that was bottom with the least amount of injuries all season...

    Man City

    http://www.teamtalk.com/news/2483/77...-of-the-crocks
  11. Akkuz's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Location: Harry Potter land
    • Posts: 7,435
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    So..we lost players to injury for 1,681 days and City lost out on 186 days :lol: And we still finished on the same number of points :rofl2:
  12. IBishell's Avatar
    • Junior Member
    • Posts: 25
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    Really excited for Kagawa as are a lot of you on here... Definitely the most exciting signing for me in a long time. :bumps:

    Would love to get Nick Powell too and send him back out on loan plus another midfielder/striker depending on what formation Fergie is planning for the season ahead...
  13. Zerforax's Avatar
    • TSR Royalty
    • Posts: 22,716
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    (Original post by Saf94)
    Interesting article here, gives stats on the amount of injuries for each team this season. We were top of it with the most injuries, 39 major injuries and 1681 days lost to injuries. And the team that was bottom with the least amount of injuries all season...

    Man City

    http://www.teamtalk.com/news/2483/77...-of-the-crocks
    (Original post by Akkuz)
    So..we lost players to injury for 1,681 days and City lost out on 186 days :lol: And we still finished on the same number of points :rofl2:
    Tbfh, having crocks like Owen on your books are going to inflate your figures.

    But it was Michael Owen who was the player missing for the single longest spell for one injury with 193 days out with a thigh problem between November and May.

    He alone was injured more days than all of City's squad but he wasn't exactly an important cog that was missing.
  14. DaveSmith99's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    (Original post by Zerforax)
    Tbfh, having crocks like Owen on your books are going to inflate your figures.

    But it was Michael Owen who was the player missing for the single longest spell for one injury with 193 days out with a thigh problem between November and May.

    He alone was injured more days than all of City's squad but he wasn't exactly an important cog that was missing.
    Everything you are saying is true, but its also true for City and Hargreaves.
  15. Zerforax's Avatar
    • TSR Royalty
    • Posts: 22,716
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    (Original post by DaveSmith99)
    Everything you are saying is true, but its also true for City and Hargreaves.
    The single most significant injury for City was Nigel De Jong's ankle problem. That kept him out for 39 days in August and September with City's six other significant injuries involving Sergio Aguero (twice, groin in October, then foot in March-April), Aleksandar Kolarov (groin November to January), Vincent Kompany (calf, March), Joleon Lescott (groin, March-April) and Pablo Zabaleta (thigh, March).

    Doesn't list Hargreaves in the 7..
  16. Saf94's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 773
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    (Original post by Zerforax)
    Tbfh, having crocks like Owen on your books are going to inflate your figures.

    But it was Michael Owen who was the player missing for the single longest spell for one injury with 193 days out with a thigh problem between November and May.

    He alone was injured more days than all of City's squad but he wasn't exactly an important cog that was missing.
    Lol, what about Vidic? He was gone for most of the season, isnt he an important cog? Your point is kind of irrelevent, even if you take out Owen we still had far more injuries than City and it did have a big effect on the title race you cant deny that.
  17. Tommyjw's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: Bristol / Plymouth University
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    (Original post by Zerforax)
    Tbfh, having crocks like Owen on your books are going to inflate your figures.
    And yet ignoring him United are still top of this list, so what is your point?
  18. JayReg's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Location: Yorkshire
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18276588

    Does it have much impact at all?

    "The US carmaker said Manchester United stood "head and shoulders" above other football teams."

  19. Rafa's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Posts: 14,822
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    (Original post by Tommyjw)
    And yet ignoring him United are still top of this list, so what is your point?
    What Tommy said :reddevil:
  20. Zerforax's Avatar
    • TSR Royalty
    • Posts: 22,716
    Re: The Manchester United Thread IX
    (Original post by Saf94)
    Lol, what about Vidic? He was gone for most of the season, isnt he an important cog? Your point is kind of irrelevent, even if you take out Owen we still had far more injuries than City and it did have a big effect on the title race you cant deny that.
    (Original post by Tommyjw)
    And yet ignoring him United are still top of this list, so what is your point?
    My point is that the figures are either wrong or inflated with injuries to squad/fringe/irrelevant players.

    Maybe United should spend more money on better physios or find less injury prone players.

    I'll give Vidic but for example Fletcher's problems were known about so adequete cover should have been found and Ferdinand has been a crock for some time, which is why Utd have so much cover at CB.

    Utd have had 'lots of injury problems' for a number of seasons now. At some point, it becomes no longer bad luck but systematic and a problem which should be addressed.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Useful resources

Articles:

Click for live football commentary

Quick Link:

Unanswered Football Threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.