Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
x

Unlock these great extras with your FREE membership

  • One-on-one advice about results day and Clearing
  • Free access to our personal statement wizard
  • Customise TSR to suit how you want to use it

Energy of vibrating string

Announcements Posted on
Find your uni forum to get talking to other applicants, existing students and your future course-mates 27-07-2015
  1. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I'm having some trouble following the derivation for the energy of a vibrating string.


    For KE:

    The KE is (1/2)(m)(v)2, which is (1/2)(Ddx)(dy/dt)2 for a given segment.

    Where D is the linear density and dx is the length of the segment.

    y = Asin(kx-wt)

    So dy/dt = -Awcos(kx-wt)

    So KE for the segment is (1/2)(Ddx)(-Awcos(kx-wt))2

    Integrating over the total length, L, gives (1/2)(DA2w2)(L/2)

    That last term is confusing me - I don't understand how the integral of cos2(kx-wt) is L/2


    For PE:

    The derivation leads with PE of segment = T(dL - dx) where T is tension.

    I'm pretty baffled by this statement, because in the KE derivation, L was the total length of the string, and had nothing to do with the vertical displacement - which I would expect to see in the PE. :confused:


    If anyone can help explain these I'd be most grateful.
    Thank you.
  2. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 99wattr89)
    I'm having some trouble following the derivation for the energy of a vibrating string.


    For KE:

    The KE is (1/2)(m)(v)2, which is (1/2)(Ddx)(dy/dt)2 for a given segment.

    Where D is the linear density and dx is the length of the segment.

    y = Asin(kx-wt)

    So dy/dt = -Awcos(kx-wt)

    So KE for the segment is (1/2)(Ddx)(-Awcos(kx-wt))2

    Integrating over the total length, L, gives (1/2)(DA2w2)(L/2)

    That last term is confusing me - I don't understand how the integral of cos2(kx-wt) is L/2


    For PE:

    The derivation leads with PE of segment = T(dL - dx) where T is tension.

    I'm pretty baffled by this statement, because in the KE derivation, L was the total length of the string, and had nothing to do with the vertical displacement - which I would expect to see in the PE. :confused:


    If anyone can help explain these I'd be most grateful.
    Thank you.

    It looks like it's been integrated with respect to x, from 0 to L, giving (1/2)(Ddx)(-Awcos(kx-wt))2, and then they've found the average KE.

    Since the KE is sinusoidal, you can find the average value by looking at the average value of cos2, which is a half (try drawing the graph if you need convincing).

    So yeah, check if the textbook mentions deriving the average KE, rather than the varying value.
  3. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by vandub)
    It looks like it's been integrated with respect to x, from 0 to L, giving (1/2)(Ddx)(-Awcos(kx-wt))2, and then they've found the average KE.

    Since the KE is sinusoidal, you can find the average value by looking at the average value of cos2, which is a half (try drawing the graph if you need convincing).

    So yeah, check if the textbook mentions deriving the average KE, rather than the varying value.
    Thank you for your explanation!
    Sorry I was slow to reply, I've just had a lot of deadlines and stuff to meet.
    I think you're right about it being average KE, thanks.
  4. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    For the potential energy I think it means the elastic potential energy - i.e. the work done in stretching a segment of the string by a length dL-dx against a tensile (restoring) force of T.

    I'm puzzled why I got negged...to try and answer your question: vertical displacement doesn't appear in the expression because given a sinosiodal shape - the mass of the string below the equilibrium position is the same as the mass above it, so the overall change in GPE is 0.
  5. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by XiaoXiao1)
    For the potential energy I think it means the elastic potential energy - i.e. the work done in stretching a segment of the string by a length dL-dx against a tensile (restoring) force of T.

    I'm puzzled why I got negged...to try and answer your question: vertical displacement doesn't appear in the expression because given a sinosiodal shape - the mass of the string below the equilibrium position is the same as the mass above it, so the overall change in GPE is 0.
    I see! Thank you!

    I don't see why you got negged either. :confused:

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: April 19, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Poll
Would you consider Clearing if you missed your offer?
Results and Clearing

Results are coming...

No sweat. Here's all you need to make sure you're ready

new on tsr

What's your life ambition?

Graduating, travelling, owning a business?

x

Think you'll be in clearing or adjustment?

Hear direct from unis that want to talk to you

Get email alerts for university course places that match your subjects and grades. Just let us know what you're studying.

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.