If Israel nuked Iran
Discuss events occurring around the world, relations between countries, or actions of any group or organisation with an international focus.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning | 16-05-2013 | |
-
Re: If Israel nuked IranA Persian state has existed in the region that is Iran since time immemorial. Sure the government may or may not be a bit dodgy but that doesn't mean the persian people don't have a right to be there.(Original post by 122025278)
Of course they are, they are living next to an unelected theocracy that funds and supports terrorists.
It'll never happen but the UK should help Israel in any way they can if they do attack. Provide air cover with our navy for example, in case the Iranian's try and retaliate.
The real question is what would happen if Israel nuked Iran? My scenario is all the Arab nations may use that as an excuse to attack Israel, not because they have any love for Iran (It is a myt that the Arabs and Iranians are the same. Iranians are Persian, totally different culture) but because they fear they would be next. America and it's girlfriend (Imean Britain) step in to help Israel by invading and firing off some nukes, Russia gets pissed at all the nuking near their area and threatens to either nuke back or give the Arabs nukes, Arabs/Russians nuke the Americans and British back, Europe sends some failed token army that the crusaders would have laughed at and gets nuked and invaded by Russia, seeing as India is buddies with the west and Pakistan is tired of being bossed around by the US they make a pact to join the Russians against India so India and Pakistan start nuking each other, China decides to use the chaos to steamroll all the east asian countries especially those bastards Taiwan, Japan are just a bunch of castrated hello kitty lovers so they get butchered pretty fast. America is the only force in the area so they fight the Chinese there, America collapses due to fighting 50 different wars all over the planet so Europe/India/Israel is left to beast it out against Russia/Pakistan/China for many years to come. It probably ends when Africa who is left alone because noone really cares about them bides their time and boosted by fleeing refugees from the west gets more and more powerful and swings the war by either helping the Russians by opening a new southern front against the Europeans by invading them (ironically) and giving Russia a base to invade America from, or by helping Europe by sending over manpower and supplies. The French of course surrendered long ago.
So that my friends is worst case scenario.Last edited by sexbo; 13-04-2012 at 19:57. -
Re: If Israel nuked IranLol will respond to you when I finish laughing at your critisising me for lack of evidence(Original post by DYKWIA)
People can deny. You have very little evidence to back this statement up. Involvement doesn't equate to 'a major threat to peace'.
The USA has been doing the middle east a lot of good. It is the involvement of the USA in Iraq that has made that country a reasonably good place now. I think it is expensive to get involved in helping the rest of the world to develop, but it is the right thing to do.
Foreign affairs often come down to wars though. Although I think what is going on the middle-east is a 'conflict' as opposed to an all out war. And actually it was largely european empires that were the reason behind the problems in the middle east today. Europe should have more of a role in the problems it has created. Instead it lets the USA do the work. -
Re: If Israel nuked IranThe evidence would be that the US goes to war far more often than anyone else.(Original post by DYKWIA)
You have very little evidence to back this statement up.
So, what about their involvement in keeping Saddam in power for decades? Did that do Iraq any good?The USA has been doing the middle east a lot of good. It is the involvement of the USA in Iraq that has made that country a reasonably good place now.
What would have been best for Iraq would be to let them overthrow Saddam themselves, like they tried to in 1991 (where the US assisted Saddam in putting down the rebellion).
Undoubtedly yes. But it's the US' continued attempts to control the region since then that have halted and prevented progress.And actually it was largely european empires that were the reason behind the problems in the middle east today.
