(Original post by Perseveranze)
Short on time, so most of my post is reference reading.
So your problem is with an age gap lol? How do those liberals say it; "your backwards"
There's so many marraiges today which have age gaps. But one thing that doesn't happen today is in regards to the Prophet(pbuh)s marraige to Khadija(ra) who was 40 when he himself was 25. How many 25 year old men do you see today marrying 40 year old women?
A child having promiscuous sex with others irresponsibly with no accountability: Human right
A child getting contraceptives without parental consent: Human right
A child getting an abortion without parental consent: Human right (Varies.)
A child getting treated for sexually-transmitted diseases without parents' knowledge: Human right
A child entering into a legal, announced union with parents' knowledge, support, and approval; as well as a dowry, a wedding, a contract and legal status as a spouse ensuring rights; and no sex until puberty (i.e., adulthood): Disgusting, abominable, tasteless, inhumane abuse.
There are some things money can't buy. For everything else, there's MasterCard.
Refuted here; http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.c...having-sx.html
Summary: Fabricated hadith
According to you right?
How do you personally interpret this meaning when the Prophet(pbuh) said;
"Do not beat the female servants of Allah";
"Some (women) visited my family complaining about their husbands (beating them). These (husbands) are not the best of you."
So is this a contradiction, or are you typically ignoring context? And how comes the Prophet never hit any of wives?
And personally speaking (not sure if this flies with the "defined" western meaning), but tapping the shoulder with a toothbrush doesn't sound like "hitting" to me.
Shows how clueless you are.
“The data show that there is little connection between suicide terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism, or any one of the world’s religions. . . . Rather, what nearly all suicide terrorist attacks have in common is a specific secular and strategic goal: to compel modern democracies to withdraw military forces from territory that the terrorists consider to be their homeland”
Firstly, stupidity doesn't negate fact. The ottomens started the moon symbol, and considering they had control of pretty much most of the Muslim world at a time, it's no suprise their influence remained.
And sorry, but "hinduism didn't start idol worshipping", idol worshipping was happening all around the world before Islam came to liberate.
How judgemental of you, the gay community would not appreciate.