Why the HELL is America still in Afghan?

Are you just stupid - look at all the atrocities I'm talking about. I'm talking about violation of international law. Japan had Unit 731, but then look at the number of American international atrocities compared to an other civilisations. You're not very fast on the up take. I'm getting tired of explaining things to you.

Switzerland human development index is far greater than the U.S's - so you're wrong again.

so executing hundreds of thousands of afgans that didnt want to convert to islam or taking even more into slavery wouldnt be classed as a 'violation of international law' ?
your making a fool of yourself now

The UN Charter is a treaty ratified by the United States and thus part of US law. Under the charter, a country can use armed force against another country only in self-defense or when the Security Council approves. Neither of those conditions was met before the United States invaded Afghanistan. The Taliban did not attack us on 9/11. Nineteen men – 15 from Saudi Arabia – did, and there was no imminent threat that Afghanistan would attack the US or another UN member country. The council did not authorize the United States or any other country to use military force against Afghanistan. The US war in Afghanistan is illegal.

Marjorie Cohn, professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, president of the National Lawyers Guild

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present)

From you're comment I can safely assumed you're not particularly familiar with this sort of stuff. I would also like to point out afghanistan is not a war but an occupation; both have different definitions.

you chose to gloss over/ignore those other examples, as a hypocrite would

read my edit please.. I said number of violations. Please get things right. You're too stupid to continue with sorry x

Because they're irrelevant to the thread.

The Taliban were protecting those that carried out 9/11 though. They refused to hand over Bin Laden and there were a large number of al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan. I think thats a fair justification there for the invasion. Whilst the Taliban did not attack the US they were shielding those that did. al Qaeda carried out quite a few attacks against the US 9/11 was merely the worst of them all. Had the US done nothing al Qaeda would have carried out others too.

the same principle applies from my answer, the difference is that i am willing to analyse events of the past as well as currently and you are not (unless it relates to the US). Like i said thats the failing of a poorly educated school kid

Not really, your critisim of the USs foreign policy toward muslim nations, should also allow for examination of muslims own foreign policy - as you did when you yourself first brought up saudi arabia

Funny how I'm poorly educated when I have won silver medals in the Physics Olympiad, have a UMS average far greater than the majority of people. My IQ stands at 250 ^^

I'm unsure who the uneducated one is now x

oh - maybe I should list all the qualifications I did 4 years early just to help you understand how uneducated I am.^^

That was still centered around US foreign policy. Considering Saudi royal family is stinking rich and best pals with the USA, why doesn't the USA pressure it to do something to help Afghanistan in order to ''protect Muslim interests''...?

I can't see the point of being in Afghanistan, I think when we do leave we'll not have achieved much. Afghanistan will probably not become a thriving democracy, the taliban will probably regain power to some extent. If we wanted to prevent it from becoming a safe haven for terrorists we could do just as good a job using drones.

why should the US be concerned with protecting 'muslim interests'?

Exactly...what I mean.

what do you mean, constantly have drones circling it for the next 60 years?