My Personal Views On Homosexuality

Are people also implying that if a child was not to be hurt or damaged through paedophilia it would be acceptable? This question demonstrates the flawed logic of that particular argument.

Are people also implying that if a child was not to be hurt or damaged through paedophilia it would be acceptable? This question demonstrates the flawed logic of that particular argument.

I certainly do not agree with incest, I personally feel that it is disgusting. Of course I will personally say it is not natural, but in the current day and age, we cannot object to what to consenting adults do behind closed doors as long as it is not harming anyone, be it homosexuality or incest.

Which lead me to the question why would someone accept homosexuality and not incest, you can say in both cases two people love each other, what has it got to do with you?

As for homosexuality being unnatural, yes it is unnatural from the perspective of sex being designed for procreation. But unnatural doesn't not equate to bad.

A lot of people are saying that paedophilia and homosexuality cannot be compared and the comparison is not relevant. You cannot just say it is not relevant without any sort of justification. I am saying it is relevant and will pursue to argue the case. Wikipedia also agrees with the relevancy with a cited source, to quote directly from Wikipedia:

Because paedophillia damages people

but any relationship between consensual adults is perfectly acceptable

Paedophilia is a sexual orientation, how exactly does a state of mind "involve forced sexual activity without consent"?

Firstly these are my views. I have the right and I am entitled to have my views regarding this subject especially as it is always under constant mass scrutiny. Just because you do not agree with me does not mean my rights should be compromised. It is my intention to promote positive discussion of the topic and my points.

Some argue homosexuality is not a choice, one does not choose their sexual orientation. I disagree with that statement because this can also apply to other situations. A lot of people including some scientific researchers also say paedophilia is not chosen by an individual. My issue with this is if society is to accept homosexuals on the basis that they have no choice, then why punish and criminalise paedophiles as they also have no choice?

Humans are limited in their choice, we 'cant' decide what we want. We are designed in a way, this information is stored in our DNA. Society can also have a strong say. Two siblings, a brother and a sister, cannot have a sexual relationship because it goes against etiquette of society and science. He cannot just say 'oh I love my sister, its not affecting you so whats your problem if i go out with her'. I therefore believe choice alone is not justification for homosexuality.

Furthermore if we are to accept the argument 'gays are born gay' we must investigate that claim and examine what it means for humanity. Under the assumption that the argument that they are born gay holds, then it is something which is affecting their ability to reproduce (as they are not attracted to the opposite sex). Then, it is in my belief that by definition of continuity of the human race we must find a way to prevent it as it is, technically speaking, a negative genetic mutation and must be addressed by doctors and medical researchers to preserve continuity.

These are some subjects which I feel strongly about. I am willing to debate issues regarding psychology, health and hygiene, communication, social impacts etc.

This topic is constant in media, social and professional circles. There will always be support for and against, I am simply against due to some points I outlined above. I should not be down voted because of my views (there are plenty of groups which are allowed to have a say no matter how 'wrong' some people think they are such as BNP EDL Extremist Muslims), rather I would like TSR to assess my points. This issue must be discussed if were are to find an eventual solution. I welcome feedback and further discussion.

A lot of people are saying that paedophilia and homosexuality cannot be compared and the comparison is not relevant. You cannot just say it is not relevant without any sort of justification. I am saying it is relevant and will pursue to argue the case. Wikipedia also agrees with the relevancy with a cited source, to quote directly from Wikipedia:

Further to this my point is society in general is vastly negative towards paedophiles. If a paedophile is known to the authorities they are punished, criminalised and jailed. How is this fair if we are saying both circumstances are through no choice of their own? Nature has come up quiet frequently. Some users are saying homosexuality is natural and paedophilia is not - where is the evidence I ask to accept one and reject the other of being natural?

People are discussing incest as being not natural. A common consensus for the acceptance of the homosexual community is the argument where two practising consensual adults are free to do what they desire as long it is not harming anyone else. One (or two) can maintain an incestuous sexual relationship in this manner as it can be said they are not harming anyone. Many users have rejected the idea of incest on the basis that children produced from an incestuous couple will be disadvantaged from a weaker gene pool, but why are users making the assumption that all incestuous relationships will directly lead to a child I ask? Homosexuality and incest can be practised without procreation so I ask again, why is the idea of incest constantly rejected by society?

Many people have tackled my negative gene issue about human continuity by stating homosexuals will promote a negative population growth and will help issues of over crowding. I cannot express in words how offended I am by that statement. So because we want to control the population does that mean we should abandon research and development in preventing cancer and other forms of life threatening illnesses? By that logic we can say we should have more illegal wars as it will bring down the mortality levels and help control population?

So you are okay with incest?

Some people can and do say "oh I love my sister", and incest between siblings does exist. This is a contentious issue because of the issue of inbreeding and the fact that were two siblings to produce a child, said innocent child would be at risk of being disabled. This situation would involve harm being caused to an innocent party (i.e. the baby), making it objectionable. However, the point remains that gay sex does not harm anybody. This is why incest and homosexuality are two completely separate issues. And for the record, as long as two siblings are of a similar age and take measures to ensure that pregnancy does not occur, I see no problem with that kind of relationship either. But that's just my opinion.

Interesting. But those findings say absolutely nothing about the idea that homosexuality is something you were born with.

Essentially Homosexuality, Paedophila, Beastiality etc... are the same thing sexual preference disorders or a form of mental illneses if you like that cannot be changed at least not with our current technology the difference between Homosexuality and the other two is that Homosexuality isn't harming others and if we can't change who they are then there is no point denying them the right to have a homosexual relationship it's just going to make them unhappy. Paedophila I think isn't necesarily all there own fault but if they act on it they are effectivley raping someone I am attracted to girls that have knocked me back but it doesn''t mean that I will just rape them anyway because i'm stronger than them. Seeing as Paedophila hasn't got a cure I think there should be forced chemical castration for offenders which will cut off all sexual urges completley if they re offend then Physical Castration should happen that will remove any chance of re offending.

I bet there are Paedophiles out there who haven't acted on their urges but are scared to come out and ask for help to control their urges I think they should be encouraged to come out and shouldn't be demonized because they have a mental illness (as long as they haven't acted on those urges) and recieve phyciatric help and chemical castration if they think they can't control their urges.

Paedophilia is a sexual orientation, how exactly does a state of mind "involve forced sexual activity without consent"?

I like turtles.

Evidence?