My Personal Views On Homosexuality

What is or isn't a "sexual orientation" is completely up to opinion. Same with the concept of a mental "disorder". They are subjective, moralistic terms with no basis in objective science.

The link below it was an actual academic article on paedosexuality. It's the correct non-biased term for what you know as "paedophilia".


I provided several studies which claim child sexual activity is not necessarily harmful and can often be beneficial. Check the last two pages.

How can you say that, though? That's your opinion - in what way is homosexuality more natural than paedophilia.

Lol. Was it? Why even provide the wikipedia link then? And you keep ignoring that your word comes up in Urban Dictionary and the pro-pedophile website in a quick google search, not in an apparently accredited source.

And well done, several sources, okay what is the general opinion on the subject? I'm sure there are plenty more to suggest otherwise. I can't even talk to you anymore, and please do not become a parent if you think that having sex with children can be beneficial.

Goodnight.

It's not about me thinking anything. I'm only going off the scientific research. I don't have any opinions outside of the scientific evidence. If the scientific research said differently then I'd have a different opinion.

I've provided the research which attests to the fact paedophilia is no different from sexual orientations such as hetereosexuality and homosexuality and does not qualify as a 'paraphilia'. I've provided the research which attests to the fact that non-coercive child sexual activity is rarely harmful and sometimes beneficial.

Nobody has provided any of their own research which refutes it. They just say "oh yeah sure theres loads of studies disproving that but I'm not actually going to check if there is!" Why should I take their word for it when they ignore all my evidence?

Here is a rebuttal for that info you posted from the APA, APA Admits Error in Publishing Highly Criticized "Adult-Child Sex" Study: http://www.prevent-abuse-now.com/rebuttal.htm#Error

Please read all of what it says - every section before commenting.

Don't have children if you think it can be beneficial.

Why shouldn't I have children?

And wow, you really need to research the history concerning that controversy. The APA were forced to back down due to intense political pressure, condemnations from politicians and resolutions passed in legislatures which contributed to a 'chilling-effect' on that type of research.

The only reason the APA backed down because its a politically contentious issue, nothing to do with science. They even still claimed that they did not regret publishing it because of academic freedom. Of course I'm sure prevent-abuse-now.com and the Family Resource Council are highly unbiased sources on this issue.

"the American Psychological Association unveiled Wednesday a resolution condemning all "sexual relations between children and adults." However they did not refute that their research was correct. They decided that their standpoint was that it's "immoral". American psychologist associations do not decide on what is moral, particularly if their research suggests it does not cause harm. Harm is what causes things to be immoral.

"In his letter, Dr. Fowler, who had earlier defended the article on national television as "a good study," now acknowledges that the article is "inflammatory" and includes opinions "inconsistent" with APA's policy on child protection issues. He admits that APA "failed" to "evaluate the article based on its potential for misinforming the public policy process."

The only criticism is that the article is 'inflammatory', well obviously it's going to be inflammatory when everyone realises that their hysteria and political warmongering is unfounded. It would mean it could not be used as a political football. The only other criticism is that the article goes against public policy, suggesting that public policy is going against science. Which it is.

Was this article meant to prove some sort of point?

Why shouldn't I have children?

ooooh my bad smart ass.what a grammer nazi i was slightly high due to that i had a bit off spelling errors their but if you actually try to read what i was saying instead of acting BIG AND SMART on the internet you would understand what i meant.honestly you are a like hundred other grammer nazi jerks on the internet who troll for a spelling error.does this give your self esteem a boost or something? your the type of ass who probably gets bullied in school.honestly congratulation you have really peed me off!

*Sigh* No, not a grammar Nazi, merely someone who would like posts to be understandable. How picky and demanding of me! I did, in fact, take the time to read your incoherent ramblings, and they were just as illogical as the manner in which they were written.

I don't troll for spelling errors, I do however expect that, if someone is going to attempt to argue with me over my sexuality, they would at least have the decency to do it in understandable English.

Your sensitivity is really shining through here, well done. I'll have you know, I am neither an ass, nor am I bullied at school, but kudos for trying.

Oh, I peed you off; please accept my sincerest apologies.

wait hold up your a lesbian????

wait hold up your a lesbian????

Yes, thank you for noticing. Do you have a problem with that as well?

a problem.......well that will be another topic. a more dire question is i take it your atheist?

a problem.......well that will be another topic. a more dire question is i take it your atheist?

Not really, considering this thread is about homosexuality.

Yes, I am.

I take it you would have absolutely no problem letting a known paedophile look after your children?

oh no surprise!!! it all makes sense now thanks.

If I knew them and trusted them, of course. If I had a mentally retarded sister, I would let my heterosexual male friend look after her and wouldn't worry about him raping her if I trusted him. It's the same thing.

People are not automatically determined to be rapists on account of their sexuality. Those are two completely different things. I'm often in the presence of attractive females and somehow I manage to prevent myself from violently raping them.