M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' Motion
TSR's model parliament.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Ask me ANYTHING - Andrew O'Neill - Buzzcocks comedian, amateur occultist, vegan... | 22-05-2013 | |
-
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionNot that I was going to agree with the motion given its content but since you're the one member of the government floating about could you get your colleagues to proof read things before submitting them. This is riddled with things like "Diamon Jubilee" and so forth!!!(Original post by toronto353)
Aye obviously. -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionWhy exactly are you opposing this though?(Original post by Mr Dangermouse)
No. -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' Motion
Agreeable reasoning or not, the actual motion is merely calling for local councils to not get in the way of such celebrations, not to actually organise or force them themselves. Whilst I agree that this is a good thing, it shouldn't require a motion; It should just be the way it is. Councils shouldn't get in the way of public organisations, be they monarchist or republican, communist tent-****ing festivals or green trade faires.
-
- Reputation:
- Section Moderator
- I am a traveller of both time and space
- Location: Bradford
- Posts: 6,047
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionWhile I agree with the idea of promoting community cohesion, as an anti-royalist I believe this just causes unnecessary disruption to everyday life. Nay.
-
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionI didn't think councils would get in the way - the thing that gets in the way is traffic on the roads!(Original post by CyclopsRock)
Agreeable reasoning or not, the actual motion is merely calling for local councils to not get in the way of such celebrations, not to actually organise or force them themselves. Whilst I agree that this is a good thing, it shouldn't require a motion; It should just be the way it is. Councils shouldn't get in the way of public organisations, be they monarchist or republican, communist tent-****ing festivals or green trade faires. -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionI don't care about the queen.(Original post by toronto353)
Why exactly are you opposing this though? -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionSo you're reasoning is basically 'because I don't care about the queen, nobody else should so I'll vote against this motion so that others don't celebrate her reign'. This is a rather selfish reasoning process isn't it?(Original post by Mr Dangermouse)
I don't care about the queen. -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionI don't care whether other people care about the queen or not.(Original post by toronto353)
So you're reasoning is basically 'because I don't care about the queen, nobody else should so I'll vote against this motion so that others don't celebrate her reign'. This is a rather selfish reasoning process isn't it? -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionSurely abstaining would be a better option then?(Original post by Mr Dangermouse)
I don't care whether other people care about the queen or not. -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionWell if you don't care about whether other people care about the queen or not why are you so adamant in voting against this motion which would help local people to have street parties? If you didn't care, you'd vote for this motion because it doesn't matter to you whether people celebrate the queen's reign or not?(Original post by Mr Dangermouse)
I don't care whether other people care about the queen or not. -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionI don't want to be seen to be legitimising it. I will probably abstain.(Original post by toronto353)
Well if you don't care about whether other people care about the queen or not why are you so adamant in voting against this motion which would help local people to have street parties? If you didn't care, you'd vote for this motion because it doesn't matter to you whether people celebrate the queen's reign or not? -
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionI respect your decision on this issue.(Original post by Mr Dangermouse)
I don't want to be seen to be legitimising it. I will probably abstain. -
- Reputation:
- Section Moderator
- I am a traveller of both time and space
- Location: Bradford
- Posts: 6,047
Re: M72 - Diamond Jubilee 'Big Lunch' MotionPeople should be free to celebrate royal events. Street parties and closing of streets though will just infringe on the lives of those that don't care in the slightest about the monarchy. Have parties by all means, hold them in public if you must - but make it somewhere like a park or a civic centre so it's not in the way of those that just want to treat it like any other day.(Original post by toronto353)
Well if you don't care about whether other people care about the queen or not why are you so adamant in voting against this motion which would help local people to have street parties? If you didn't care, you'd vote for this motion because it doesn't matter to you whether people celebrate the queen's reign or not?