Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey there Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Are the Labour Party seen as an easy target?

Announcements Posted on
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisawhitmore)
    Well, with no nukes and no evidence of attempts to develop them, he was losing the race pretty badly.
    just like iran back in 2003:rolleyes:
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danen)
    just like iran back in 2003:rolleyes:
    Or for that matter, Iceland at the moment. Ireland also have no programme now, but theoretically could in the future. Quick, roll the tanks into Belgium, Brazil, Greece and all the other countries without nukes, they could start developing them any day now!
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisawhitmore)
    Or for that matter, Iceland at the moment. Ireland also have no programme now, but theoretically could in the future. Quick, roll the tanks into Belgium, Brazil, Greece and all the other countries without nukes, they could start developing them any day now!
    democracies dont tend to go to war with each other. crazy muslim countries do
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by IAmTheWumAndOnly)
    Anyone who supports Labour is weak and needy. Labour supporters rely on Labour to feed their own pathetic existences by providing them with benefits. They are the sheep in society who need to be herded. Real men go and make their own lives in survival of the fittest. They do things their own way and do not need to be looked after in a child like manner. They are parasites who should be discarded and done with. A mass culling is needed promptly to solve this crisis. They are the reason the economy is crippled and why society is broken and its upon those stronger people to fix it and cleanse the country of the parasites that are spreading at an astonishing rate.
    The Labour Party was the party of the needy in society. In some ways this is a benefit as I do believe those who cannot live independently by their own means should be supported. However, it has now evolved into the party of the weak individuals, who would rather be "numbers in a state computer" than their own person. The Labour Party discourages people from thinking by treating them as its servants, rather than acting as the servant of the state as the government should. The culture of dependency which it has steadily constructed from 1997 to 2010 has created weak individuals who fail to see the benefit in an honest day's work and in being motivated, self-disciplined hardworking people.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danen)
    democracies dont tend to go to war with each other. crazy muslim countries do
    What happens when we initiate wars with those coutries, support their theocracies, as long as they are no threat to regional stability, or even support the revolutionaries, who would decrease stability threats further?
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by prog2djent)
    What happens when we initiate wars with those coutries, support their theocracies, as long as they are no threat to regional stability, or even support the revolutionaries, who would decrease stability threats further?
    "we" dont initiate wars.
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by youngtory)
    The Labour Party was the party of the needy in society. In some ways this is a benefit as I do believe those who cannot live independently by their own means should be supported. However, it has now evolved into the party of the weak individuals, who would rather be "numbers in a state computer" than their own person. The Labour Party discourages people from thinking by treating them as its servants, rather than acting as the servant of the state as the government should. The culture of dependency which it has steadily constructed from 1997 to 2010 has created weak individuals who fail to see the benefit in an honest day's work and in being motivated, self-disciplined hardworking people.
    Why the negs? Without a proper rebuttal?
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danen)
    democracies dont tend to go to war with each other. crazy muslim countries do
    Yeah, no democracy would ever use a nuclear weapon.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisawhitmore)
    Yeah, no democracy would ever use a nuclear weapon.
    it wont introduce one.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danen)
    "we" dont initiate wars.
    Aside from the fact that we actually do in a lot of cases, if there is a major war going on, we are behind the scenes supporting the people who will destablise the region the least (destablise meaning not threaten our government-corporations revenue's), and the people that threaten that the least are usually dictators and extremists.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by prog2djent)
    Aside from the fact that we actually do in a lot of cases, if there is a major was going on, we are behind the scenes supporting the people who will destablise the region the least (destablise meaning not threaten our government-corporations revenue's), and the people that threaten that the least are usually dictators and extremists.
    what are you talking about ?
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danen)
    it wont introduce one.
    No, I'm sure it wasn't a democracy that introduced nuclear weapons to the middle east.

    Oh, wait, the USA did that too.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisawhitmore)
    No, I'm sure it wasn't a democracy that introduced nuclear weapons to the middle east.

    Oh, wait, the USA did that too.
    no nuclear weapons have been introduced in the middle east
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by youngtory)
    Why the negs? Without a proper rebuttal?
    Welcome to TheStudentRoom :teehee:
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Id and Ego seek)
    Welcome to TheStudentRoom :teehee:
    Thanks :P
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danen)
    no nuclear weapons have been introduced in the middle east
    It's strongly believed that Israel has nuclear weapons..


    EDIT: Or at least has the capability to manufacture them quickly.
    • 8 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by travoot)
    It's strongly believed that Israel has nuclear weapons..


    EDIT: Or at least has the capability to manufacture them quickly.
    Of course they do. Even if they'd actually done a good job of keeping it quiet, why else would they not sign the NPT and always refuse to comment (rather than just denying it) if it wasn't because they had nukes?
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anarchism101)
    Of course they do. Even if they'd actually done a good job of keeping it quiet, why else would they not sign the NPT and always refuse to comment (rather than just denying it) if it wasn't because they had nukes?
    Precisely, in my opinion it's a typical case of the USA installing military hardware to solidify their own regional dominance when the time should come that they need to rely on it for their interests. Whether that's a bad thing or not is open to discussion of course but I'm not too fond myself of the Israeli governments behavior in the region.
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danen)
    no nuclear weapons have been introduced in the middle east
    A number of organisations and experts would disagree with you. The Israeli stockpile is regularly estimated at over 100 warheads.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by youngtory)
    The Labour Party was the party of the needy in society. In some ways this is a benefit as I do believe those who cannot live independently by their own means should be supported. However, it has now evolved into the party of the weak individuals, who would rather be "numbers in a state computer" than their own person. The Labour Party discourages people from thinking by treating them as its servants, rather than acting as the servant of the state as the government should. The culture of dependency which it has steadily constructed from 1997 to 2010 has created weak individuals who fail to see the benefit in an honest day's work and in being motivated, self-disciplined hardworking people.
    Can't help but agree with every single word. You will go far my friend.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: April 17, 2012
New on TSR

Have a UCAS application question?

Post it in our dedicated forum

Article updates
Useful resources
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.