Guys would this be a major put off?
For questions and discussions relating to all aspects and kinds of relationships, from love and dating to friends, family and work. Threads about sexuality also belong here.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Please change your TSR password | 23-05-2013 | |
| Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera | 20-05-2013 | |
-
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?Thanks.(Original post by Hellz_Bellz!)
OP, Kelly Brook has 32/34E breasts.
They're not the perkiest but she's widely considered to be a very hot, attractive woman. And she's 100% natural, which a vast majority of guys prefer.
Hers are perky in comparison to mine
.
She has a very nice figure and breasts!Last edited by Illusionary; 14-04-2012 at 21:07. -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?Yes, that one!(Original post by RabbitCFH)
The one that says "Age: 28, 36 or 38 C-D depending on the bra." etc.? If so, then it's not bad. A bit saggy yeah, but boobs are boobs, and it's not #12.
-
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?I don't think there's anything to be worried about then.(Original post by Anonymous)
Yes, that one! -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?I wouldn't worry about it, seriously. You're obviously very slim and have a nice figure as well so who cares about your boobs!(Original post by Anonymous)
Thanks.
Hers are perky in comparison to mine
.
She has a very nice figure and breasts! -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?
I'm not going to say no guy will care, we all have preferences regarding looks. Some guys will prefer small, perky boobs. Other will prefer bigger breasts even if they sag a bit. Large breasts will sag - they would have done so to an extent even if you didn't lose the weight. If we compare them to fake breasts (as I believe you have, since you considered surgery), there is no way you can win. Natural breasts simply aren't big and perky at the same time.
Either way, you're not at disadvantage in any way. -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?Thanks(Original post by RabbitCFH)
I don't think there's anything to be worried about then.
-
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?My thoughts exactly.(Original post by Bellissima)
if they are shallow enough to be put off from having sex with you/having a relationship because your boobs sag a little, when they are otherwise attracted to you.. do you really want to be with them? -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?Mmmh yes, of course!(Original post by Jabberwox)
To be brutally honest, any guy who would be 'put off' isn't really worthy of your affections. If a guy really loves a girl, he will love her body too. The fact that some guys have 'preferences' is kinda shallow, imho.
Aha! I see...(Original post by Jabberwox)
He won't be put off if he really likes you. If he is put off, his affections were obviously superficial in the beginning.
My body isn't perfect either, far from it
so you're not alone OP. In fact a lot of girls have aspects of their body they dislike. But a guy who loves you will overlook these flaws

Spoiler:Show
-
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?I'm sorry, but I laugh when I hear this kind of stuff.(Original post by Jabberwox)
To be brutally honest, any guy who would be 'put off' isn't really worthy of your affections. If a guy really loves a girl, he will love her body too. The fact that some guys have 'preferences' is kinda shallow, imho.
Women have their "preferences" too -tall, dark, broad shoulders. rich, famous etc.
When it comes to finding a mate, women are as, or even more shallow than men.
If you ask any famous male, I'm sure he could tell you of the amount of women who throw themselves at him
E.g. Frankie Cocozza - who has boasted about almost getting a hundred women to sleep with him in under a year.....
Attraction is a shallow game. This goes for BOTH men and women. Women are no less (and I would argue in many cases more) shallow than men -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?Good for them(Original post by dgeorge)
I'm sorry, but I laugh when I hear this kind of stuff.
Women have their "preferences" too -tall, dark, broad shoulders. rich, famous etc.
When it comes to finding a mate, women are as, or even more shallow than men.
If you ask any famous male, I'm sure he could tell you of the amount of women who throw themselves at him
E.g. Frankie Cocozza - who has boasted about almost getting a hundred women to sleep with him in under a year.....
Attraction is a shallow game. This goes for BOTH men and women. Women are no less (and I would argue in many cases more) shallow than men
-
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?I gotta agree. It's fair enough calling guys shallow but women are just the same - it's not just men who have preferences.(Original post by dgeorge)
I'm sorry, but I laugh when I hear this kind of stuff.
Women have their "preferences" too -tall, dark, broad shoulders. rich, famous etc.
When it comes to finding a mate, women are as, or even more shallow than men.
If you ask any famous male, I'm sure he could tell you of the amount of women who throw themselves at him
E.g. Frankie Cocozza - who has boasted about almost getting a hundred women to sleep with him in under a year.....
Attraction is a shallow game. This goes for BOTH men and women. Women are no less (and I would argue in many cases more) shallow than men -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?I think people have misunderstood what I meant by 'shallow'. Yes people have preferences for looks like hair colour, size, etc. but something like breast size and shape appears a bit shallow to me which was the point of my first comment on this thread.(Original post by Hellz_Bellz!)
I gotta agree. It's fair enough calling guys shallow but women are just the same - it's not just men who have preferences.
Not all women are shallow either
I'm not
-
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?I meant preference in terms of breast size and shape... ¬_¬(Original post by dgeorge)
I'm sorry, but I laugh when I hear this kind of stuff.
Women have their "preferences" too -tall, dark, broad shoulders. rich, famous etc.
When it comes to finding a mate, women are as, or even more shallow than men.
If you ask any famous male, I'm sure he could tell you of the amount of women who throw themselves at him
E.g. Frankie Cocozza - who has boasted about almost getting a hundred women to sleep with him in under a year.....
Attraction is a shallow game. This goes for BOTH men and women. Women are no less (and I would argue in many cases more) shallow than men -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?I still think there would have to be something MAJORLY wrong in the downstairs department to turn me off a guy if I had already got to that stage. I mean I'm talking chode/hairy shaft here, which is a lot worse that boobs that are a bit saggy - and no more saggy than the general population of big breasted womens boobs either I might add.(Original post by Hellz_Bellz!)
I gotta agree. It's fair enough calling guys shallow but women are just the same - it's not just men who have preferences. -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?Tbh I highly...highly....HIGHLY...doub t that when it comes to the bra coming off stage he's going to go...(Original post by Anonymous)
It's just that I seem to be getting on well with this other guy and I think it might lead to something but I'm worried he might be put off when he sees what's beneath the bra
"hmmm..not quite as perky as I prefer...put the bra back on, I'm afraid I'm going home!" -
Re: Guys would this be a major put off?Having preferences is shallow?(Original post by Jabberwox)
To be brutally honest, any guy who would be 'put off' isn't really worthy of your affections. If a guy really loves a girl, he will love her body too. The fact that some guys have 'preferences' is kinda shallow, imho.
Somebody pinch me, I must be dreaming.
I'm sure you have no preferences in a guy whatsoever, that's why you're saying that.
.