Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Simplifying expression with fractional power

Announcements Posted on
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Is there a simpler form for this? (I've come up with it as an intermediate step to solving a problem, but not sure I should proceed with it in this form.)

    3/2(x^3/2)?

    All I've come up with so far is 3/2{(sq rt x)^3}, but I don't think that's simpler...
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    \displaystyle \frac{3}{2} x^{\frac{3}{2}}

    If this is what you mean then it is already in its simplest form.

    If you need more help, post the whole problem.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Okay, because it's not in LaTeX, I am not sure what you mean. I'll consider the first case that I'm thinking.

    So, I see this: \left \frac {3}{2} \right x^{\frac {3}{2}}.

    Recall for x^{\frac {p}{q}}, where q\not=0, the expression becomes \sqrt[q] {x^p}.

    You should grab \frac {3x}{2} \sqrt {x}.
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SZRoberson)
    You should grab \frac {3x}{2} \sqrt {x}.
    I wouldn't call that a "simpler form" but it may be a useful form, depending on the question.
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Yes, the expression was as both of you thought.

    Both answers helpful - thanks! I think notnek's form may well be useful, as it's one of the functions that I'm working on using the Product Rule for differentiation.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oldie)
    Yes, the expression was as both of you thought.

    Both answers helpful - thanks! I think notnek's form may well be useful, as it's one of the functions that I'm working on using the Product Rule for differentiation.
    Well, you won't really need the product rule for this one, seeing as a constant multiplier is out front.

    Just use the power rule.
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SZRoberson)
    Well, you won't really need the product rule for this one, seeing as a constant multiplier is out front.

    Just use the power rule.
    Oldie said that "it's one of the functions" so I'm assuming there is another and he will need to use the product rule.
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I think she will. :-)

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: April 17, 2012
New on TSR

The future of apprenticeships

Join the discussion in the apprenticeships hub!

Article updates
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.