Anders Breivik pleads not guilty. Really?

These people were legitimate targets in a war over the future of society.

They were in the majority unarmed children. If you think they were legitimate targets then you are a sick person.

You are wrong to say they are innocent. These were people at a party political event. Politics is about control. I don't really consider their age to be that relevant either.

These people were legitimate targets in a war over the future of society.

He isn't insane either, having a killing instinct isn't the same as insanity. I don't agree with him, but attempting to label him as mentally ill is reminsicent of soviet tactics against dissidents.

Let's be clear here, the medical examiners assessed Breivik's mental stability and declared that he displayed schizophrenic behaviour, concluding that he is insane due to his 'delusional political beliefs'. However, I bevlieve this to be completely false (which is why I incidentally wasn't surprised to hear that the conclusion was almost immediately disputed). Why? Because Brievik's beliefs are actually not delusional at all - it is a demographic fact that within decades to come, most Western European nations will be colonised by Islam. It is a demographic reality, and not a matter if, but when. Whether or not this is a good or bad thing depends entirely on the opinion of the individual - in Brievik's case, we are all aware that from his point of view it is clearly and most certainly perceived as a bad thing. Personally, I myself do not want this to happen, and I'm sure many others share the same opinion.

That being said, there is no denying that the Brievik's actions on the 22 July 2011 were horrific and terribly disturbing, and I am in no way condoning these actions he committed, and he should obviously now face the consequences.

The million dollar question is - why does it take horrendously violent demonstrations like those of Brievik's to attempt to spread the message that the Islamisation of Europe is very much a reality?

Just being honest here.

I don't think he is insane. It obviously takes a certain kind of mindset to kill people for your political cause but he isn't first in human history by a long way and he won't be the last. In my opinion the first doctors said he was schizophrenic wholly on the basis of his political beliefs been delusional. However the majority of the stuff he says isn't delusional in fact its all factual its just a matter of interpretation. Immigration and multiculturalism are definitely happening.

He pleading not guilty simply to further his cause hence the salute in court. He knows at the end of the day he will go to a prison or an institution regardless of what happens in court.

Where he mentions self-defence he means that he acting in defence of indigenous Europeans and says he doesn't recognise the Oslo court because he regards the govt as traitors.

And just too add i am not condoning him!

Any evidence of this 'demographic fact' then?

He put the word 'fact' into bold, seems some people on here think their made up statements are more valid by stating 'Its a fact' or italicising/bolding words

Immigration and multiculturism in Western Europe is a fact cause the evidence is there, the Islamic 'colonisation' of Western Europe is possible but certainly not a fact at all.

Let's be clear here, the medical examiners assessed Breivik's mental stability and declared that he displayed schizophrenic behaviour, concluding that he is insane due to his 'delusional political beliefs'. However, I bevlieve this to be completely false (which is why I incidentally wasn't surprised to hear that the conclusion was almost immediately disputed). Why? Because Brievik's beliefs are actually not delusional at all - it is a demographic fact that within decades to come, most Western European nations will be colonised by Islam. It is a demographic reality, and not a matter if, but when. Whether or not this is a good or bad thing depends entirely on the opinion of the individual - in Brievik's case, we are all aware that from his point of view it is clearly and most certainly perceived as a bad thing. Personally, I myself do not want this to happen, and I'm sure many others share the same opinion.

That being said, there is no denying that the Brievik's actions on the 22 July 2011 were horrific and terribly disturbing, and I am in no way condoning these actions he committed, and he should obviously now face the consequences.

The million dollar question is - why does it take horrendously violent demonstrations like those of Brievik's to attempt to spread the message that the Islamisation of Europe is very much a reality?

Just being honest here.

Who were engaged in the business of supporting a polity that is immigrating foreigners. All the gang rapes in Oslo for the last few years have been committed by immigrants, it's not a secret what's happening. These people renounced their own group identity in exchange for one of cultural marxism.




Humans have been killing each other for aeons. It's not a sign of insanity, as much as you'd wish it to be.