Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate

Only UN members may post. Go here to apply for membership.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
Sign in to Reply
  • View Poll Results: Does the General Assembly agree with this resolution?
    Yes
    9 56.25%
    No
    2 12.50%
    Abstain
    5 31.25%

  1. toronto353's Avatar
    • Community Assistant
    • PS Helper
    • Wiki Support Team
    • TSR Legend
    • Posts: 13,116
    Re: Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate
    The text has not been amended to also include the beneficial effects of exercise and the consumption of chocolate as part of a health diet and therefore the MHoC will abstain.
  2. Foghorn Leghorn's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: Omicron Persei 8
    Re: Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate
    Zimbabwe will be abstaining this vote as Zimbabwe feels not enough has been done to ensure the western oppressors do not take advantage of this motion by holding countries that have cocoa as a cash crop to ransom. We feel that our good friends Russia are too trusting of the imperialist countries.
    Last edited by Foghorn Leghorn; 25-04-2012 at 19:06.
  3. Foghorn Leghorn's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: Omicron Persei 8
    Re: Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate
    Lithuania has abstained this motion as we feel our initial concerns were ignored by Russia and the rest of the Assembly. The UN has failed to ensure that safe guards will be made for those countries that depend on the cocoa beans as a main export as to stop multinationals from exploiting cocoa farmers in the developing world. We feel other nations have forgotten the levels of exploitation saw in the chocolate industry in the late 20th century and early 21st century. And although unfair trade in the production of chocolate has decreased, many corporations still exploit poor cocoa farmers at worrying rates. If this motion is passed without ensuring safe guards in the fair trading of cocoa beans, then we will start to see massive economic problems in nations that depend on the production of cocoa. This may lead to a real risk in severe hardship for cocoa farmers that are already below the poverty line and may lower their quality of living further from their already sub-standard levels.

    Lithuania further states that Russia's failure to acknowledge the points made by the pannel is further proof of the Russian Federation's unwillingness to have any form of concern for nations other that itself.
    Last edited by Foghorn Leghorn; 25-04-2012 at 19:05.
  4. Mechie's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 6,525
    Re: Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate
    Yes lol, India could do with some more chocolate.
  5. missbanana21's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Location: Scotland
    • Posts: 271
    Re: Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate
    Libya abstains for similar reasons to Lithuania: the sweetness of chocolate does not outweigh the trade needs of our African brothers.
  6. chancellorroberts's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 387
    Re: Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate
    Chocolate melts too fast in Saudi Arabia so we say no
  7. Akbar2k7's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Location: Walthamstow
    • Posts: 1,612
    Re: Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate
    Turkey believes chocolate is not an important issue thus abstains.
  8. thunder_chunky's Avatar
    • And all the roads we have to walk are winding
    • Location: Eternia
    Re: Resolution 2012/05 - Readdressing the issue of chocolate
    This vote has finished, the resolution has passed!


    [ooc] A poor voting turn out. I'm very disapointed. [/ooc]
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Useful resources
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.