Probability of the lowest eigenenergy, quantum theory
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Important: please read these guidelines before posting about exams on The Student Room | 28-04-2013 | |
-
Probability of the lowest eigenenergy, quantum theory

So I have my solutions of part b, but I'm not sure how to go about c.
What eigenfunction am I using, exactly?
For the region
I have the eigenfunction
. The lowest eigenenergy should be at n=0 I think, but doing this leaves just the constant A. Do we work this constant out using a boundary condition?
Edit: Oh of course I'm using
and
Last edited by wanderlust.xx; 18-04-2012 at 19:37. -
Re: Probability of the lowest eigenenergy, quantum theoryNormalising your wavefunction should yield A and, yes, n=0 is the lowest energy. This can be seen by the fact that n clearly determines the frequency of the eigenstates and E=h*f(Original post by wanderlust.xx)

So I have my solutions of part b, but I'm not sure how to go about c.
What eigenfunction am I using, exactly?
For the region
I have the eigenfunction
. The lowest eigenenergy should be at n=0 I think, but doing this leaves just the constant A. Do we work this constant out using a boundary condition?
Edit: Oh of course I'm using
and
Last edited by ben-smith; 18-04-2012 at 20:17. -
Re: Probability of the lowest eigenenergy, quantum theoryOh yeah.(Original post by ben-smith)
Normalising your wavefunction should yield A and, yes, n=0 is the lowest energy. This can be seen by the fact that n clearly determines the frequency of the eigenstates and E=h*f
So after normalising I got
.
Thus

Hence

Does this look right? Seems fine to me, but I'd appreciate a correction if needed!
Thanks for the help.
-
Re: Probability of the lowest eigenenergy, quantum theoryActually, having done a bit of reading, I have feeling n=0 is not actually the lowest energy eigenstate as it makes the wave function discontinuous at the sides of the box. sorry about that.(Original post by wanderlust.xx)
Oh yeah.
So after normalising I got
.
Thus

Hence

Does this look right? Seems fine to me, but I'd appreciate a correction if needed!
Thanks for the help.
-
Re: Probability of the lowest eigenenergy, quantum theoryThe problem now is that normalising becomes a pain in the arse, since we'd have(Original post by ben-smith)
Actually, having done a bit of reading, I have feeling n=0 is not actually the lowest energy eigenstate as it makes the wave function discontinuous at the sides of the box. sorry about that.
Last edited by wanderlust.xx; 18-04-2012 at 21:43. -
Re: Probability of the lowest eigenenergy, quantum theory
Okay, here's another idea. Since the potential is symmetric, I can split our solutions into even and odd states, yielding
Even:


Odd:


Hence our lowest eigenenergies for Even and Odd parity states respectively will be


but now clearly we have
, so we use the even eigenfunction 
in

Does this work? If not, why not?