Monotone Convergence
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Re: Monotone ConvergenceLet(Original post by nuodai)
It almost follows from the theorem. But first you have to write
for some
in such a way that
is an increasing sequence tending to
. (Then you have something that satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem.) Can you do that?
Then the case for
is similar by considering positive and negative parts.
where
is the characteristic function.
Then since
,
is an increasing sequence of functions which converges everywhere to
.
So the result now follows from the MCT. Right?
Any function
can be written as
where
are the +ve and -ve parts of
.
Then we know that if
then
.

If I let
then
is increasing and converging everywhere to
and let
so
is an increasing sequence of functions which converges everywhere to
.
So
and the results for
and
follow from the MCT.
What is the significance of the question saying
converge?
Does the result for
now follow from the MCT?
Last edited by TheEd; 18-04-2012 at 23:56. -
Re: Monotone ConvergenceThat's right.(Original post by TheEd)
Let
where
is the characteristic function.
Then since
,
is an increasing sequence of functions which converges everywhere to
.
So the result now follows from the MCT. Right?
You could essentially have stopped here. Since(Original post by TheEd)
Any function
can be written as
where
are the +ve and -ve parts of
.
Then we know that if
then
.
are nonnegative, you could have just said that the result follows from the first part of the question.
That's just the statement that
is integrable for each
. It ensures that
and
are all finite so that you're not taking infinity away from infinity or anything horrible.
-
Re: Monotone ConvergenceOK. So how do I exactly structure the argument?(Original post by nuodai)
That's right.
Let
.
Then since
we have that
is an increasing sequence of functions which converges everywhere to
.
Now we are supposing
converges.
So by MCT,
How does the results that
and
now follow from the MCT?
Last edited by TheEd; 19-04-2012 at 23:21. -
Re: Monotone ConvergenceLet(Original post by TheEd)
OK. So how do I exactly structure the argument?
Let
.
Then since
we have that
is an increasing sequence of functions which converges everywhere to
.
Now we are supposing
converges.
How does the results that
and
now follow from the MCT?
where
. Then
since
.
Then
is an increasing sequence in
tending to 
So by the monotone convergence theorem
and
Last edited by nuodai; 19-04-2012 at 23:24. -
Re: Monotone ConvergenceOK. So why do we have to assume that the integral of the absolute value of(Original post by nuodai)
Let
where
. Then
since
.
Then
is an increasing sequence in
tending to 
So by the monotone convergence theorem
and
converges for the 2nd part?

Can I split it into 2 integrals like I did before with
there?
Last edited by TheEd; 19-04-2012 at 23:50. -
Re: Monotone Convergence(Original post by TheEd)
OK. So why do we have to assume that the integral of the absolute value of
converges for the 2nd part?

Can I split it into 2 like I did before with |.| there?
, and
, so if
then
and
, so that the difference
is well-defined. This is something you should have come across in the definition of (
-)integrability.
Last edited by nuodai; 19-04-2012 at 23:52.

