[patrickinator]

well should they?

Edit: I mean the amount of times you can thumb down or up different people as I can only seem to do it about four or five times before it says that I have reached the maximum number of posts that I can thumb up or down for the day.

[modini]

No. What benefit would that pose?

[roh]

Do you mean the same person? Because it already does that, you have to spread rep around.

[txo]

They do (I think?)

Anyway, do you mean limit the amount of times you thumb up/down the same post or the amount of times you thumb up/down different posts? If it's the same post, I don't see why you would need to do it several times, but I do think we should be able to thumb up/down as many different posts as we like.

[meenu89]

'Thumb people up or down?'

Otherwise known as positive or negative reputation...
I think it is ok the way it is.

[Bey Taco]

Yes. People will start to randomly thumb people up and down when they are bored and valuable comments will go unheard.

[I<3LAMP]

I'm surprised anyone really cares tbh.

Annoying when I like a specific username's post and later on I like another one of their posts a few threads later and I can't rate them.

Guess it stops rep whoring but meh.

[Aspiringlawstudent]

No.

Some people make such excellent posts that they deserve infinite pos rep

And some (SummerSofas, Otkem etc) deserve infinite neg rep

[patrickinator]

(Original post by meenu89)
'Thumb people up or down?'

Otherwise known as positive or negative reputation...
Yes, I think it is ok the way it is.

Boris please stop stalking all my threads,
this reminds me of the duck song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtN1YnoL46Q

[HarveyCanis]

One of your poll answers is incorrect. It should be "you are a douchebag".

[Ape Gone Insane]

One of the benefits of a set limit is that it there is more value to the rep that you do choose to distribute.

[lucas13]

it already does, why does it matter

[the_13th]

I'd thumb down your ass, pig;