Durham vs. Nottingham

University course discussion for law.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
The Universities forums need new moderators - nominations please! 06-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. NYU2012's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: New York University '12 --> Durham Law '15
    • Posts: 2,866
    Durham vs. Nottingham
    I posted something similar to this before, but I still cannot decided, so I was hoping for some further input?

    Durham:
    3-year LLB

    Pro's:
    Greater course selection
    Like the idea of doing the 3rd year dissertation
    Like the collegiate system
    LOVE the historic parts of the campus
    'Quintessential English University' (I'm from the US)
    Brand new law school/law building

    Con's:
    More courses per year (6 courses per year)
    1 year longer (1 more year of tuition)
    Campus isn't as beautiful overall (i.e. not as much green space; not a self-contained campus, etc)

    Nottingham:
    2-year Senior Status LLB
    Pro's:
    Less classes per year (5 courses per year)
    1 less year (meaning 1 year less of tuition)
    Beautiful campus!!!!! I absolutely LOVE the Nottingham campus!

    Con's:
    No option to do a dissertation
    Less course selection
    Not as 'traditional', which isn't really a problem.

    I can afford the additional year of tuition at Durham, so that's not really a problem -- but I don't want to spend unnecessary money.

    Also, is the Senior Status LLB viewed as equal to the regular 3-year LLB?


    Thoughts? Opinions? Which would you go to and why?
    Thanks!
    Last edited by NYU2012; 23-04-2012 at 20:59.
  2. michael321's Avatar
    • PS Helper
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,450
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    (Original post by NYU2012)
    I posted something similar to this before, but I still cannot decided, so I was hoping for some further input?

    Durham:
    3-year LLB

    Pro's:
    Greater course selection
    Like the idea of doing the 3rd year dissertation
    Like the collegiate system
    LOVE the historic parts of the campus
    'Quintessential English University' (I'm from the US)
    Brand new law school/law building

    Con's:
    More courses per year (6 courses per year)
    1 year longer (1 more year of tuition)
    Campus isn't as beautiful overall (i.e. not as much green space; not a self-contained campus, etc)

    Nottingham:
    2-year Senior Status LLB
    Pro's:
    Less classes per year (5 courses per year)
    1 less year (meaning 1 year less of tuition)
    Beautiful campus!!!!! I absolutely LOVE the Nottingham campus!

    Con's:
    No option to do a dissertation
    Less course selection
    Not as 'traditional', which isn't really a problem.

    I can afford the additional year of tuition at Durham, so that's not really a problem -- but I don't want to spend unnecessary money.

    Also, is the Senior Status LLB viewed as equal to the regular 3-year LLB?


    Thoughts? Opinions? Which would you go to and why?
    Thanks!
    It's really very subjective. Personally I'd pick Durham because I like a quieter life and the collegiate system.

    But there's definitely something to be said for shaving a year off the degree. By the time you've taken your first degree, your LLB and your LPC/BPTC you'll be old and grey...
  3. Tsunami2011's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,685
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    I would prefer Nottingham, because for me Durham personally would be a constant reminder of what I could have had.:bawling:
  4. NYU2012's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: New York University '12 --> Durham Law '15
    • Posts: 2,866
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    (Original post by michael321)
    It's really very subjective. Personally I'd pick Durham because I like a quieter life and the collegiate system.

    But there's definitely something to be said for shaving a year off the degree. By the time you've taken your first degree, your LLB and your LPC/BPTC you'll be old and grey...
    If I did a 3-year LLB and then LPC, I would be... 24 when I finished. I wouldn't consider that old and grey

    Or, of course, 23 if I did the 2-year SS at Notts.
  5. NYU2012's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: New York University '12 --> Durham Law '15
    • Posts: 2,866
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    (Original post by Tsunami2011)
    I would prefer Nottingham, because for me Durham personally would be a constant reminder of what I could have had.:bawling:
    The joys of being an Oxbridge reject! lol

    Is there any other reason you would choose Nottingham over Durham?
  6. AverageExcellence's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 989
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    Durham all the way!
  7. Tsunami2011's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,685
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    (Original post by NYU2012)
    The joys of being an Oxbridge reject! lol

    Is there any other reason you would choose Nottingham over Durham?
    I would still be an oxbridge reject at Nottingham, I just wouldn't be subjected to a watered down version of the Oxbridge system and those with a chip on their shoulder.

    If you're interested in nightlife/partying Nottingham is far better. Durham is also very north of England, but you're an international, so it probably wouldn't affect you, but its about 7hrs away from me. Just go with your gut instinct, since both are good enough to get you into the magic circle if that what you're after.

    Apart from that, I wouldn't really have much preference.
  8. michael321's Avatar
    • PS Helper
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,450
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    (Original post by NYU2012)
    If I did a 3-year LLB and then LPC, I would be... 24 when I finished. I wouldn't consider that old and grey

    Or, of course, 23 if I did the 2-year SS at Notts.
    I guess it's a personal choice; all I'm saying is that if I'd already done one degree, and had the prospect of a vocational training course after the second one, I would be getting a bit bored of education and wanting to get a move on in life.

    That said, if I had to choose for a first degree, I would go for Durham.

    Basically I'm being totally useless by giving you two opposing opinions in the same post...
  9. NYU2012's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: New York University '12 --> Durham Law '15
    • Posts: 2,866
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    (Original post by michael321)
    I guess it's a personal choice; all I'm saying is that if I'd already done one degree, and had the prospect of a vocational training course after the second one, I would be getting a bit bored of education and wanting to get a move on in life.

    That said, if I had to choose for a first degree, I would go for Durham.

    Basically I'm being totally useless by giving you two opposing opinions in the same post...
    I actually want to eventually go back for at least a PhD, if not a masters or even two PhDs. I have no problems being an academic . lol

    What about make you choose Durham?
  10. michael321's Avatar
    • PS Helper
    • Overlord in Training
    • Posts: 2,450
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    (Original post by NYU2012)
    I actually want to eventually go back for at least a PhD, if not a masters or even two PhDs. I have no problems being an academic . lol

    What about make you choose Durham?
    Durham is a smaller, quieter, more compact and more student-dominated town, which I personally prefer. I live in Nottingham and there are an awful lot of chavs kicking about if you ever go clubbing.

    Durham also has a collegiate system, which, though it is not as developed as Oxbridge's, is still a nice way of running things.

    Durham's also a much more historic town, which appeals to me though it's a personal thing once again.
  11. littlecreatures's Avatar
    • Junior Member
    • Posts: 58
    Re: Durham vs. Nottingham
    theres really not much between both schools. theres not much between the law dpts of notts, durham, bristol and warwick in particular. you should just go with your gut feel with this one, since that extra year isnt much of a consideration, in you case.

    if ur concerned about the overall rep of the university, if u think u might not necessarily practice in future, IMO durham uni has a TAD more prominence in the west, or respectability, being slightly oldboyish, and old. In asia however, notts seems to have an upperhand with employers.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.