[TheCurlyHairedDude]

(Original post by Mrx123)
nope, lost it a while ago......lol not everyone has a ton of sex in their teens...if they do then their stupid

You're right, but sex is experience. I'd hate to lose my virgnity at like 22, and then meet the girl of my dreams, but can't satisfy her in bedroom

[Mrx123]

(Original post by TheCurlyHairedDude)
You're right, but sex is experience. I'd hate to lose my virgnity at like 22, and then meet the girl of my dreams, but can't satisfy her in bedroom

i was 21 wen i lost mine to love of my life.....I can satisfy her......everyones different i guess

I never need a condom shes on implant, we were both virgins and were both clean.....win win if you ask me

[The_Jammy_Witch]

(Original post by sweeter than a cherry pie)
Oh, did you not recognise the Anchorman quote?



Not especially, from what I remember posting, but maybe if I read back over my comments.




Then what manner of flaunting it acceptable? Pretty sure that inherent in the word "flaunting" are implications of boastfulness, flashiness, showy-offy-ness, etc. It has somewhat negative connotations to me, anyway. And the British seem far more predisposed to enjoy a person being self-deprecating than self-applauding. Apparently it's very different in America.

What you were flaunting is a commodity. You're a girl, and you have a queue. How original. When girls capitalise on how much boys want them, ON A FORUM, it'd bad taste, and there's a reason you felt the need to publicise that as well. If someone had asked 'say pie, are you in demand right now?' then it'd make sense, but as it is, no one asked. You told. If you were as much of the bees knees as your online persona believes, then it would be a state of being, not a state of telling and certainly not a state of typing.

Next time, try flaunting or demonstrating that you have something to offer other than that which is thoroughly generic. That manner of flaunting is acceptable and will earn you respect in far greater magnitude than describing how boys want you (i.e. how well you wear what nature has given you) and then contesting it when other posters legitimately hand your backside to you for spurting such self-congratulatory fluff that serves only the purpose of showing that, as of yet, you bring nothing to the table of this discussion other than to remind us that all that glitters is not gold.

Ya get me fam?

[Mrx123]

(Original post by sweeter than a cherry pie)
Did you completely miss the post I was answering when I mentioned the queue? Granted, it was a bit of an in-joke with the person I was responding to, but he made the inference that there was no-one around for me now (knowing full well as he said so that that is not the case), to which I replied that in fact there were several. It wasn't completely out of the blue, as you seem to think.


I could sit here and come up with a list of things I have to offer the world and the people around me, and chances are someone is still going to take offence at what I have written and take it upon themselves to shoot me down, because OBVIOUSLY they have me completely sussed as a person based on a couple of posts on a student forum.

she likes sex, shes made tht vry clear

[redferry]

(Original post by sweeter than a cherry pie)
Just stating a fact. He is still in love with me. And my previous ex, from whom I've been apart for more than a year, is still sending me flowers. Problem?

Well aren't you just lovely.

It's obviously a problem for him. Flowers are expensive AND bad for the environment. You should probably make him stop doing that.

[itchy and scratchy]

No way - he's now fat, ugly and hairy. I now have horrible visions in my head..

[redferry]

(Original post by sweeter than a cherry pie)
You are exempt from the recent declaration of ignoring quotes on this thread, as you've only just joined the fray, but all I'm going to say is that the "Problem?" was aimed at the poster who had quoted me, and evidently did have a problem with what I said. I agree that it's not the best thing in the world that a guy I have had no contact with for more than a year is still sending me flowers, but when I no longer have any contact details for him there's not a lot I can do.

Set them on fire and return to sender.

[Studentus-anonymous]

No thanks, the idea is to get over her, she broke up bwith me and I miss her but it won't help.

[SimpleGirl]

(Original post by bananaslug77)
Absolutely not, it makes me sick to think I ever even slept with him! haha.

Unfortunately, I'd have to agree

[Foo.mp3]

(Original post by Teofilo)
sex with an ex for me ended very messily for me (and I'm not just talking about the sheets), so I wouldn't do it again.

(given your sig) should we call the cops!?

(Original post by Journeyzap)
Although he keeps trying it on with me when he gets the chance, just no.

'When in Rome'

(Original post by Mrx123)
must be a long stick with all this bragging

(Original post by TheCurlyHairedDude)
I agree with everyone else

Bandwagon ftw.

She was merely clarifying why she wouldn't go there with her ex's That a guy gets hung up on a girl says nothing about how a girl rates herself

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
You're a girl, and you have a queue..

You make one or two points that are good in principal but it's rather unfortunate that you have been hasty and, as such, they have been entirely misdirected in this instance

(Original post by sweeter than a cherry pie)
Granted, it was a bit of an in-joke with the person I was responding to

Can confirm this to be the case

Can also confirm, rather ironically, that she is genuinely one of the most humble and thoughtful people you could ever wish to meet

Clearly some of you have got the wrong end of the aforementioned 'stick' ~ and now have poop on your hands as a consequence

[The_Jammy_Witch]

(Original post by Foo.mp3)
(given your sig) should we call the cops!?

'When in Rome'

Bandwagon ftw.

She was merely clarifying why she wouldn't go there with her ex's That a guy gets hung up on a girl says nothing about how a girl rates herself

You make one or two points that are good in principal but it's rather unfortunate that you have been hasty and, as such, they have been entirely misdirected in this instance

Can confirm this to be the case

Can also confirm, rather ironically, that she is genuinely one of the most humble and thoughtful people you could ever wish to meet

Clearly some of you have got the wrong end of the aforementioned 'stick' ~ and now have poop on your hands as a consequence

Well, no, I haven't been hasty. I've commented based on what pie has said, not on whatever extra rapport you may have. That's by the by. I will respond only on how she has presented herself in this case, which is as a flatulant brag merchant. If that isn't the reality then I make no apology for being honestly unaware of this. In other words: I treat them as I see them.

You say you can 'confirm', lending no actual basis for your opinion. And you say that your view is 'clearly' so, when all that appears clear to me is that you're kissing bum. Where's the substance.

[The_Jammy_Witch]

(Original post by sweeter than a cherry pie)
Did you completely miss the post I was answering when I mentioned the queue? Granted, it was a bit of an in-joke with the person I was responding to, but he made the inference that there was no-one around for me now (knowing full well as he said so that that is not the case), to which I replied that in fact there were several. It wasn't completely out of the blue, as you seem to think.


I could sit here and come up with a list of things I have to offer the world and the people around me, and chances are someone is still going to take offence at what I have written and take it upon themselves to shoot me down, because OBVIOUSLY they have me completely sussed as a person based on a couple of posts on a student forum.

No, I didn't miss it. But the only way you could have justified such a flatulant comment would be if someone directly asked about it, which no one did. And since he knew full well, I see no reason for you to say it. Who you kidding? I didn't say it was out of the blue, I said that no one asked, which is a point of fact.

Someone might, but it wouldn't have been me. And who's claiming to have you completely sussed? Calm down, and don't go re-contextualising just because you received a righteous gut-wrenching on this point (and only this point).

[Foo.mp3]

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
Well, no, I haven't been hasty

Aye you have, unfortunately you've interpreted a bit of banter/an 'in' joke between friends as her being seriously arrogant

[The_Jammy_Witch]

(Original post by Foo.mp3)
Aye you have, unfortunately you've interpreted a bit of banter/an 'in' joke between friends as her being seriously arrogant

Seriously is putting words in my mouth. Generically would be more accurate since, in mitigation, she ain't exactly the first girl or first PERSON to capitalise on their desirability to the opposite sex in a way that is actually a bit sad.

Remember the post where pie reiterates her arrogance regarding the queue in response to a poster that wasn't you? Something about 69ing? There's no escaping the TJW verdict.

A brag but, a typical brag, she remains.

[Foo.mp3]

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
Seriously is putting words in my mouth

Seriously as in 'in all seriousness' e.g. straight faced arrogance

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
Remember the post where pie reiterates her arrogance regarding the queue in response to a poster that wasn't you? Something about 69ing? There's no escaping the TJW verdict.

She was being playful and making a mockery of the charge, hence the winky face, and suggesting that if she was going to be called up on anything it should at least be something that presents as arrogant if taken seriously (rather than some flimsy connection between stating that ex partners were still hung up on her and an inflated sense of self world). Capeesh?

[The_Jammy_Witch]

(Original post by Foo.mp3)
Seriously as in 'in all seriousness' e.g. straight faced arrogance

That's flirty banter, and not serious trust me! hehe

Well, maybe it was, and maybe it wasn't. But on the face of it, if it looks like a thing, smells like a thing, and reads like a thing

then it probably is that thing

which is a sad spot of bragging.

[Foo.mp3]

(I updated the above reply)

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
if it looks like a thing, smells like a thing, and reads like a thing

I hope to God you're not reading law

It didn't present as that 'thing' in all seriousness, at worst it presented as a bit of flirty banter, which hardly warranted personal attacks, nor your acerbic comments when all she'd then done is attempted to defend herself in a light hearted manner. I'm not all that keen on the type of girl you've confused her with but I would never bare such antipathy, unless perhaps I had a major axe to grind..

You don't accept that you, and several other posters, were mistaken to assume certain things and that you both individually, and collectively, acted improperly. Ok. Well I've said my piece now so all we can do is agree to disagree and I shall hope that reason/humility win through in the end of their own accord

[The_Jammy_Witch]

(Original post by Foo.mp3)
Seriously as in 'in all seriousness' e.g. straight faced arrogance

She was being playful and making a mockery of the charge, hence the winky face, and suggesting that if she was going to be called up on anything it should at least be something that presents as arrogant if taken seriously (rather than some flimsy connection between stating that ex partners were still hung up on her and an inflated sense of self world). Capeesh?

Flippin' edits! You're like the freakin' hydra beast you are. Where one weak modicum of an argument gets beheaded, a few more spring up in its place. You're changing words around like some sort of tycoon. You argue like Tetris, in word form, changing them around in a desperate attempt to make it all fit.

I've based my argument more or less solely on the queue comment, leaving the exes comment in the periphery, to further but vaguely reinforce my point but if we must go there

let me just say

that there is a considerable difference between 'stating that ex partners were still hung up' and going, he's still in love with me. The other one sends me flowers. (No quotation marks = realise it's not verbatim, not going to dig deep)

There's a reason she wrote it the way she did and it smells of low status. It was an unnecceasrily dramatic way to go about things. Incidentally if she had wrote it as you have, as in 'my ex is still hung up on me', I'm sure she would've avoided some of the negative responses that have been based on the ex comment because it's more neutral and less stickupdabum.

If anything it sounds more like desperation on the exes' parts anyway and so I wonder if it's anything to be proud of in the first place. Well done, ya pulled a clinger. Again: how. Original. But that's a tertiary point.

[The_Jammy_Witch]

(Original post by Foo.mp3)
(I updated the above reply)

I hope to God you're not reading law

It didn't present as that 'thing' in all seriousness, at worst it presented as a bit of flirty banter, which hardly warranted personal attacks, nor your acerbic comments when all she'd then done is attempted to defend herself in a light hearted manner. I'm not all that keen on the type of girl you've confused her with but I would never bare such antipathy, unless perhaps I had a major axe to grind..

You don't accept that you, and several other posters, were mistaken to assume certain things and that you both individually, and collectively, acted improperly. Ok. Well I've said my piece now so all we can do is agree to disagree and I shall hope that reason/humility win through in the end of their own accord

I am, so buckle up.

You're mistaken to call anything I've said an assumption. It's based purely on the text that she has written, nothing else.

Your personal experience is obviously influencing you and that's understandable, but no good to you here because you cannot undo what she has written, and that is what she is being judged for. And that alone.

Up against all my fine prose, the only alternative you've skantily offered is that it was flirty banter. Brilliant. You only think you know that because of your personal experience which the impartial reader has not had. And even if that were the case, then she should step up and realise how she herself comes across in this instance to somebody who doesn't know her in real life as you do - and I hope that the plethora of negative feedback will alert her to this in future.

[Foo.mp3]

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
Flippin' edits! You're like the freakin' hydra beast you are. Where one weak modicum of an argument gets beheaded, a few more spring up in its place. You're changing words around like some sort of tycoon. You argue like Tetris, in word form, changing them around in a desperate attempt to make it all fit.

Flattered that you're so taken with my disjointed 'style' I had to revisit it as I realised I had misremembered what she'd written, went back and had a look, and then changed my comment accordingly. So solly , not used to dealing with quick-fire eager beavers pouncing on my posts with such immediacy

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
I've based my argument more or less solely on the queue comment

Hardly a sound basis for a character assassination really is it?

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
leaving the exes comment in the periphery, to further but vaguely reinforce my point but if we must go there

Wise to leave that one well alone, any arrogance extricated from that'n must be imputed and you know what they say about assumpion..

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
he's still in love with me. The other one sends me flowers

This is the truth. There is no hint that these facts have anything to do with her personal charms

(Original post by The_Jammy_Witch)
There's a reason she wrote it the way she did and it smells of low status

Again this is rather ironic as she doesn't think in such terms, if you knew her/or even checked her post history, I'm sure you'd get a very different 'wiff'; perhaps your detective's nose was a little off, at any rate I've a feeling it could certainly be put to more constructive uses than this kind of Johnny-come-lately mud slinging..