Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI

Discussion for A-Level students and for those choosing their A-Level subjects.

This thread is sponsored by:
Announcements Posted on
Important: please read these guidelines before posting about exams on The Student Room 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. Etoile's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: my own little world :)
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Maths_Lover)
    :woo: Well done! :party2:



    No wonder I was having troubles... I haven't covered hyperbolic functions yet! :shakecane:

    :lol:
    (Original post by chickenonsteroids)
    Well done

    (Original post by Llewellyn)
    I'm no where near finishing ...

    But then, neither is anyone else in my class :rolleyes:

    Congrats! 95% is excellent
    Thank you everyone!! This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D

    Llewellyn, when is your deadline? :lolwut:
  2. bananarama2's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Etoile)
    Thank you everyone!! This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D

    Llewellyn, when is your deadline? :lolwut:
    Setting you sights high I see
  3. Llewellyn's Avatar
    • Section Moderator
    • Astray anyway
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Etoile)
    Thank you everyone!! This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D

    Llewellyn, when is your deadline? :lolwut:
    13th of May for the final draft :holmes:

    I still have faith...
  4. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Llewellyn)
    Prove by contradiction that e is irrational given:

     \displaystyle e = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{  \infty}  \frac{1}{n!}
    YES! Learned this over the Easter holidays.

    Assume e is rational. Then it can be expressed as a ratio of coprime integers, a and b:

     \displaystyle e = \frac{b}{a} = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{  \infty}  \frac{1}{n!}

     \displaystyle = (a-1)!b = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{  \infty}  \frac{a!}{n!} - upon multiplying through by a factorial.

    Now, as a and b are both positive integers, (a-1)!b must also be a positive integer, as are all of the terms in the series \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{  \infty}  \frac{a!}{n!} up until and including the term \dfrac{a!}{a!} .

    Therefore the terms beyond \dfrac{a!}{a!} must sum to a positive integer to make this possible.

    Considering the terms after \dfrac{a!}{a!} :

    \displaystyle \frac{a!}{(a+1)!} + \frac{a!}{(a+2)!} + \frac{a!}{(a+3)!} + \cdots = a! \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=1}^{  \infty} \frac{1}{(a+n)!}

    One can say that \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=1}^{  \infty} \frac{1}{(a+n)!} is less than \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=1}^{  \infty}  \frac{1}{(a+1)^n} =  \frac{1}{(a+1)} \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{  \infty}  \frac{1}{(a+1)^n}

    Summing the resulting geometric progression to infinity:

    \displaystyle S_{\infty } \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{  \infty}  \frac{1}{(a+1)^n} = \frac{1}{1- \frac{1}{(a+1)} }

    \displaystyle = \frac{(a+1)}{a} - upon simplification.

    \displaystyle \therefore \frac{1}{(a+1)} \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{  \infty}  \frac{1}{(a+1)^n} = \frac{1}{(a+1)}  \left(\frac{(a+1)}{a} \right) = \frac{1}{a}

    Now, the maximum value that \dfrac{1}{a} can take is 1, so this means that:

    \displaystyle 0 < \frac{a!}{(a+1)!} + \frac{a!}{(a+2)!} + \frac{a!}{(a+3)!} + \cdots < 1.

    \displaystyle \frac{a!}{(a+1)!} + \frac{a!}{(a+2)!} + \frac{a!}{(a+3)!} + \cdots is now defined to be an integer between zero and one.

    Consider an integer k, which lies between zero and one. Then 0 < k < 1 . On multiplying through by k, we obtain 0 < k^2 < k , which is nonsense as the square of an integer is never less than the integer so we reach a contradiction and so there exist no such integers k.

    This means that we reach a contradiction with \displaystyle 0 < \frac{a!}{(a+1)!} + \frac{a!}{(a+2)!} + \frac{a!}{(a+3)!} + \cdots < 1 and so our original assumption must have been false.

    It follows that e is irrational.
    Last edited by Maths_Lover; 03-06-2012 at 22:06.
  5. chickenonsteroids's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 6,716
    • Warning points: 2
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Maths_Lover)
    x
    How do you prove 2+2 will always equal 4?
  6. Llewellyn's Avatar
    • Section Moderator
    • Astray anyway
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Maths_Lover)
    x
    Very good +1 for the latex effort

    (Original post by chickenonsteroids)
    How do you prove 2+2 will always equal 4?
    Don't open that can of worms.
  7. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    So many LaTex fails in that last post. :facepalm:
  8. bananarama2's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by chickenonsteroids)
    How do you prove 2+2 will always equal 4?
    I'd argue is axiomatic and true for physical parallels.
  9. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by chickenonsteroids)
    How do you prove 2+2 will always equal 4?
    Dear goodness no.

    (Original post by Llewellyn)
    Very good +1 for the latex effort

    Don't open that can of worms.
    Thanks. :lol: It serves as good practice in LaTex. :ahee:
  10. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Emissionspectra)
    We had a maths test recently and I was the only one who could intergrate \int sin^3xcos^2x\ dx
    Go you. :five:

    (Original post by Etoile)
    Thank you everyone!! This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D

    Llewellyn, when is your deadline? :lolwut:
    You're welcome. :woo:
  11. chickenonsteroids's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 6,716
    • Warning points: 2
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by wcp100)
    I'd argue is axiomatic and true for physical parallels.

    (Original post by Maths_Lover)
    Dear goodness no.
    axiomatic truths annoy me for some reason.

    Silly rationalism
  12. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    Here's the next one:

    \displaystyle \int \sqrt{25 - x^2} \ dx

    A little trickier...
    Last edited by Maths_Lover; 01-05-2012 at 22:23.
  13. Llewellyn's Avatar
    • Section Moderator
    • Astray anyway
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    To expand, we need to define what 2 and 4 are. If by 2, you mean a real number that rounds to 2 and by 4 you mean a real number that rounds to four then 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6, and by extension, 2+2 =5, not 4. You can really mess with maths through various philosophies of language.

    There is a perceived truth, or axiom, that 2+2 = 4 because it seems logical. But that is just a belief; it is not knowledge.

    (Original post by chickenonsteroids)
    axiomatic truths annoy me for some reason.
    Spoken like a true philosopher.

    If it comforts you, there are several arguments that can be put forward that suggest no one is right.

    And, to get off topic, that is what I dislike about how maths is taught at school. What maths actually is; is like learning a language of truth, through it I can make a series of statements and you have to accept that I am right. And from there, you can construct arguments that range from why probabilities cannot be set, to why black holes exist, etc. That is the beauty of maths, and that kind of reasoning and logic is not even slightly touched upon until University level... :grumble:
    Last edited by Llewellyn; 01-05-2012 at 22:30.
  14. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by chickenonsteroids)
    axiomatic truths annoy me for some reason.

    Silly rationalism
    Let it be... the world would be mental without axioms. :eek2:
  15. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    You might like this one (or maybe not):

    \displaystyle \int^{\frac{\pi }{2} }_0 \frac{5}{3\sin \theta + 4\cos \theta } \ d\theta

    This is the last question from me tonight.
  16. chickenonsteroids's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 6,716
    • Warning points: 2
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Llewellyn)
    To expand, we need to define what 2 and 4 are. If by 2, you mean a real number that rounds to 2 and by 4 you mean a real number that rounds to four then 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6, and by extension, 2+2 =5, not 4. You can really mess with maths through various philosophies of language.

    There is a perceived truth, or axiom, that 2+2 = 4 because it seems logical. But that is just a belief; it is not knowledge.


    Spoken like a true philosopher.

    If it comforts you, there are several arguments that can be put forward that suggest no one is right.

    And, to get off topic, that is what I dislike about how maths is taught at school. What maths actually is; is like learning a language of truth, through it I can make a series of statements and you have to accept that I am right. And from there, you can construct arguments that range from why probabilities cannot be set, to why black holes exist, etc. That is the beauty of maths, and that kind of reasoning and logic is not even slightly touched upon until University level... :grumble:
    Knowledge a belief also. It's a justified belief and that's why knowledge seems to change a lot. Yay science

    :congrats: for the statement I put in bold. It's so true, maths is interesting but, for me, it's when you question why something is the case and not just saying 'x is this... use it'

    (Original post by Maths_Lover)
    Let it be... the world would be mental without axioms. :eek2:
    Imagine what we'd do without the Euclidean axioms :eek4:
  17. bananarama2's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Maths_Lover)
    Here's the next one:

    \displaystyle \int \sqrt{25 - x^2} \ dx

    A little trickier...
     \frac{x}{2} \sqrt{25-x^2} + \arcsin \left(\frac{x}{5} \right)\frac{25}{2}
  18. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by chickenonsteroids)
    Imagine what we'd do without the Euclidean axioms :eek4:
    I can't! :yikes:
  19. Maths_Lover's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by wcp100)
     \frac{x}{2} \sqrt{25-x^2} + \arcsin \left(\frac{x}{5} \right)\frac{25}{2}
    Perfect!

    You are destroying these... I'll have to find some more difficult ones for you.

    Try the last one.
  20. bananarama2's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
    (Original post by Maths_Lover)
    Perfect!

    You are destroying these... I'll have to find some more difficult ones for you.

    Try the last one.
    Any hints for the last one?
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.