Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
Discussion for A-Level students and for those choosing their A-Level subjects.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Important: please read these guidelines before posting about exams on The Student Room | 28-04-2013 | |
-
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI(Original post by Maths_Lover)
Well done! 
No wonder I was having troubles... I haven't covered hyperbolic functions yet!
Thank you everyone!!(Original post by Llewellyn)
I'm no where near finishing ...
But then, neither is anyone else in my class
Congrats! 95% is excellent
This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D 
Llewellyn, when is your deadline?
-
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VISetting you sights high I see(Original post by Etoile)
Thank you everyone!!
This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D 
Llewellyn, when is your deadline?
-
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI13th of May for the final draft(Original post by Etoile)
Thank you everyone!!
This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D 
Llewellyn, when is your deadline?

I still have faith...
-
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VIYES! Learned this over the Easter holidays.

Assume
is rational. Then it can be expressed as a ratio of coprime integers,
and
:

- upon multiplying through by a factorial.
Now, as
and
are both positive integers,
must also be a positive integer, as are all of the terms in the series
up until and including the term
.
Therefore the terms beyond
must sum to a positive integer to make this possible.
Considering the terms after
:

One can say that
is less than 
Summing the resulting geometric progression to infinity:

- upon simplification.

Now, the maximum value that
can take is
, so this means that:
.
is now defined to be an integer between zero and one.
Consider an integer
, which lies between zero and one. Then
. On multiplying through by
, we obtain
, which is nonsense as the square of an integer is never less than the integer so we reach a contradiction and so there exist no such integers k.
This means that we reach a contradiction with
and so our original assumption must have been false.
It follows that
is irrational.
Last edited by Maths_Lover; 03-06-2012 at 22:06. -
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VIHow do you prove 2+2 will always equal 4?(Original post by Maths_Lover)
x -
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VIVery good(Original post by Maths_Lover)
x
+1 for the latex effort 
Don't open that can of worms.(Original post by chickenonsteroids)
How do you prove 2+2 will always equal 4? -
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VII'd argue is axiomatic and true for physical parallels.(Original post by chickenonsteroids)
How do you prove 2+2 will always equal 4? -
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VIDear goodness no.(Original post by chickenonsteroids)
How do you prove 2+2 will always equal 4?
Thanks.
It serves as good practice in LaTex.
-
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VIGo you.(Original post by Emissionspectra)
We had a maths test recently and I was the only one who could intergrate

You're welcome.(Original post by Etoile)
Thank you everyone!!
This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D 
Llewellyn, when is your deadline?
-
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI(Original post by wcp100)
I'd argue is axiomatic and true for physical parallels.
axiomatic truths annoy me for some reason.
Silly rationalism
-
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VI
To expand, we need to define what 2 and 4 are. If by 2, you mean a real number that rounds to 2 and by 4 you mean a real number that rounds to four then 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6, and by extension, 2+2 =5, not 4. You can really mess with maths through various philosophies of language.
There is a perceived truth, or axiom, that 2+2 = 4 because it seems logical. But that is just a belief; it is not knowledge.
Spoken like a true philosopher.(Original post by chickenonsteroids)
axiomatic truths annoy me for some reason.
If it comforts you, there are several arguments that can be put forward that suggest no one is right.
And, to get off topic, that is what I dislike about how maths is taught at school. What maths actually is; is like learning a language of truth, through it I can make a series of statements and you have to accept that I am right. And from there, you can construct arguments that range from why probabilities cannot be set, to why black holes exist, etc. That is the beauty of maths, and that kind of reasoning and logic is not even slightly touched upon until University level...
Last edited by Llewellyn; 01-05-2012 at 22:30. -
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VIKnowledge a belief also. It's a justified belief and that's why knowledge seems to change a lot. Yay science(Original post by Llewellyn)
To expand, we need to define what 2 and 4 are. If by 2, you mean a real number that rounds to 2 and by 4 you mean a real number that rounds to four then 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6, and by extension, 2+2 =5, not 4. You can really mess with maths through various philosophies of language.
There is a perceived truth, or axiom, that 2+2 = 4 because it seems logical. But that is just a belief; it is not knowledge.
Spoken like a true philosopher.
If it comforts you, there are several arguments that can be put forward that suggest no one is right.
And, to get off topic, that is what I dislike about how maths is taught at school. What maths actually is; is like learning a language of truth, through it I can make a series of statements and you have to accept that I am right. And from there, you can construct arguments that range from why probabilities cannot be set, to why black holes exist, etc. That is the beauty of maths, and that kind of reasoning and logic is not even slightly touched upon until University level...
for the statement I put in bold. It's so true, maths is interesting but, for me, it's when you question why something is the case and not just saying 'x is this... use it'
Imagine what we'd do without the Euclidean axioms
-
Re: Current Year 12 Thread Mark VIAny hints for the last one?(Original post by Maths_Lover)
Perfect!
You are destroying these... I'll have to find some more difficult ones for you.
Try the last one.

This is 40% of my grade as well, so I'd only need 2/60 marks in the exam for a D 



