The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by billydisco
So I was correct.....


1) You dont need a good school to get average GCSEs.
2) I wasnt born into a rich family- the opposite.


Would we? I am fairly confident if we had access to the lorries we could find replacements very quickly (even the army could do that job if it came to it). This is why they are not paid a high wage- they are replaceable.


Im not saying they don't need help- I'm saying we shouldn't give them it. Life is about survival and to do that you have to help yourself first!

If you guys want to help them, then reduce my tax and you can contribute more. How about that?




You really are an idiot of the highest order.
A prejudiced one too. This country NEEDS cleaners, binmen, builders, plumbers, people who do the jobs you think are below you. In fact we need them a heck of a lot more than we do lawyers or accountants. If everyone was a lawyer or accountant or doctor society wouldn't work.

Maybe you've never experienced an inner city school. A school where half the kids don't turn up, most have never even met their father and all of them live in relative poverty. How do you expect these types of people to succeed in life if we don't help them to?

I hope one day if you take ill and can't afford private healthcare that you don't expect the NHS to help you, i mean if you're not even rich enough to afford your own healthcare you don't deserve it. According to you're logic.
Malcolm X once stated "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing."

Seems as though Otkem is hating those rich lazy benefits scroungers who just don't want to work. They want to be on the Playstation all day while spending his tax money. I bet he loves those billionaires at the top. The ones who create all those jobs.
Reply 222
People are idiots.
Reply 223
I get the feeling that you are politically naive, the labour party was born out of the workers struggle against the greedy ruling classes, people who lived in huge houses whilst people starved to death. How long did it take for common people to get the right to vote, you yourself would now have no vote if the greedy ruling classes had their way. As for ruining the economy was'nt a lot of it to do with greedy bankers and multi-millionairs who want to avoid taxation. Dont forget too that the labour goverment gave us the NHS, think about that next time you or one of your loved ones takes to illness. This present government would take that away from you.
Original post by Alofleicester
And you judge being on benefits for a year as not contributing?

Er yes- taking is not the same as giving??????

Original post by Alofleicester
Right, imagine a man, he left school at age 16 and went pretty much straight into work, working near constantly for 26 years (about 6 months unemployment in that time) - the company he works for is hit by the recession and as a result he is made redundant. Having left school at 16 he has very few qualifications and so finds it hard to get a job, spending nearly 2 years out of work despite applying for pretty much everything going - under your idea, he shouldn't be allowed a say in how his country is run, but he's contributed far more during his employment than he received during that period of unemployment. Now how is that fair? That a persons history should be completely ignored in favour of one year when they were seriously down on their luck.

If he didn't think short-term and got more qualifications BEFORE he "jacked-in" education then he'd find it easIER getting a new job, wouldnt he?

This is EXACTLY why I ****ing hate Labour. How the hell is this person "unlucky" when the stupid moron ran out of the school gates at the first opportunity and then wonders why he cant find a job??

Here's a better idea: make yourself better qualified. Increase your employment "demand factor", the extent to which an employer demands your skills and guess what, your employability increases.

Its not neuroscience, is it?

Problem is lefties like you have no problem with short-termism because your ideology is full of it (just like Labour spend spend spend and then oh, we're in debt?).

Anybody with two brain cells can see my point.
Original post by Sdiff
Yeah, the UK was great back then, except for the fact that we needed to be bailed out by the IMF, had stupid high taxes, were dominated by unions, some of our largest industries were unprofitable and had to be subsidised, low wages, culture of underachievement, winters of discontent...
But yeah, Old Labour was totally great



It may not have neen prefect but it was much better now. The middle class were much better off. Much bigger houses and a higher standard of living. Didnt have to pay to go to University, in fact you got a grant to help you go.

http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_national_debt

Look at this. See how our debt drops when socialism was introduced in after the war and the country nearly ends up in profit but then Thatcher introduces free market capitalism.

The only thing that is stopping the debt from rising massively is the constant sale of all Great Britain assets.

Our roads will go soon to a Chinese investment company.
Original post by billydisco
(Have a think first before you reply to this......)

Why do you think Britain's average salary today is £25k and not £5k

(I'll give you a clue, it has something to do with the empire :wink: )


It was actually because we industrialised first, the first factory was built in the UK. For a long time our reliance on coal which we did, and still do, have an abundance of allowed us to push that forward. You gained little from most of the empire and the only country where things were gained was India. Even then most of what was gained was hoarded by a few(thousand) people and most of the country lived on in poverty. Germany was a country that had no empire, yet they have a similar standard of living because they industrialised just after us (about 40-50 years but much earlier than the 200-250 for NICs). The majority of our wealth was created by factories and innovation rather than the exploration of other countries through a dominant military.
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by Bornblue
You really are an idiot of the highest order.
A prejudiced one too.

No im just smarter and you're struggling to deal with it.


Original post by Bornblue
This country NEEDS cleaners, binmen, builders, plumbers, people who do the jobs you think are below you.

Where did I say I think they are below me? I just said they are far more replaceable. If they aren't so easily replaceable, how did the polish come here and suddenly start work as plumbers?


Original post by Bornblue
In fact we need them a heck of a lot more than we do lawyers or accountants.

Really? So are you saying if binmen didn't exist, we would be physically unable to carry out waste to the tip?

Re builders and plumbers, ever heard of the term "DIY"?

Original post by Bornblue
If everyone was a lawyer or accountant or doctor society wouldn't work.

Since when did I disagree?

Original post by Bornblue
Maybe you've never experienced an inner city school. A school where half the kids don't turn up, most have never even met their father and all of them live in relative poverty. How do you expect these types of people to succeed in life if we don't help them to?

But Labour created this??

-They opened the floodgates to immigration in the 70s and 90/00s
-They said the two-parent family wasn't essential
-They closed all the grammar schools in inner cities
-They enforced political correctness so that youths would not respect authority


Original post by Bornblue
I hope one day if you take ill and can't afford private healthcare that you don't expect the NHS to help you, i mean if you're not even rich enough to afford your own healthcare you don't deserve it. According to you're logic.

Im a tory, therefore I am a hard work and I can afford it :wink:
Original post by Rainingshame
It was actually because we industrialised first, the first factory was built in the UK. For a long time our reliance on coal which we did, and still do, have an abundance of allowed us to push that forward. You gained little from most of the empire and the only country where things were gained was India. Even then most of what was gained was hoarded by a few(thousand) people and most of the country lived on in poverty. Germany was a country that had no empire, yet they have a similar standard of living because they industrialised just after us (about 40-50 years but much earlier than the 200-250 for NICs). The majority of our wealth was created by factories and innovation rather than the exploration of other countries through a dominant military.


So we spent (equivalent of) billions on this "empire" thing, on the Navy, fighting more wars than the world put together, protecting our colonies, when it did not benefit us financially in any way?
What you have to actually realise that now there is no right or left. Just bought and paid for free market capitalist globalists. They are all working for the same goal, it is the same people paying them off.
Original post by billydisco
Er yes- taking is not the same as giving??????

Well no, but giving more than you take over your life time is still an overall contribution to society is it not (and that's if we decided that giving should be measured solely in economic terms).


If he didn't think short-term and got more qualifications BEFORE he "jacked-in" education then he'd find it easIER getting a new job, wouldnt he?

This is EXACTLY why I ****ing hate Labour. How the hell is this person "unlucky" when the stupid moron ran out of the school gates at the first opportunity and then wonders why he cant find a job??

So again, you just ignore a massive section of a life time of contribution in favour of one small mistake?

Well because he worked hard for a quarter of a life span, he was made redundant through no fault of his own. Or do you believe he brought it upon himself?


Here's a better idea: make yourself better qualified. Increase your employment "demand factor", the extent to which an employer demands your skills and guess what, your employability increases.

Its not neuroscience, is it?

Really? So you're advocating being a jack of all trades and a master of none? Experience should mean far more than qualifications.



Problem is lefties like you have no problem with short-termism because your ideology is full of it (just like Labour spend spend spend and then oh, we're in debt?).

Anybody with two brain cells can see my point.

As opposed to the conservatives' save money now without considering the long term effect sort of policy?

Boy, I can see your point - I just think it's an evil, compassion-less belief created by a delusion of superiority.
Reply 231
Original post by Otkem
No it wouldn't, because Conservatives and Conservative voters are not so selfish as Labour voters. Nationalisation of the health service is the reason our cancer survival rates are so awful compared with the USA.

Pensioners and students had it so ****ing easy during Labour's rule. I am glad they are now paying their fair share.


Pensioners had it easy? We'll just ignore the fact that many of them left school at 14/15, completed national service and worked their asses off for 40/50 years?

Im proud to say that I voted 123 for my labour candidates in the local council elections as the tories will destroy this country. The rich deserve to be taxed, the poor deserve to be helped. We live in the 21st century, not the 16th
Original post by billydisco
Er yes- taking is not the same as giving??????


If he didn't think short-term and got more qualifications BEFORE he "jacked-in" education then he'd find it easIER getting a new job, wouldnt he?

This is EXACTLY why I ****ing hate Labour. How the hell is this person "unlucky" when the stupid moron ran out of the school gates at the first opportunity and then wonders why he cant find a job??

Here's a better idea: make yourself better qualified. Increase your employment "demand factor", the extent to which an employer demands your skills and guess what, your employability increases.

Its not neuroscience, is it?

Problem is lefties like you have no problem with short-termism because your ideology is full of it (just like Labour spend spend spend and then oh, we're in debt?).

Anybody with two brain cells can see my point.


How far would that work? if everyone did exactly that then he'd be in the same place only he'd have entered the workplace at 18 or 21/22. If everyone stayed in school until we had doctorates he would still be unemployed and in the same place we're in now. And you're under the assumption that he had the academic ability to get those qualifications to good standard or had the ability to go somewhere where they could be gained. If he was clearly not smart enough to go university what is the point of staying on past age 16, school is not for everyone. Also some people live in ares with no adult education systems (sixth forms/colleges), how are you supposed to progress from there?
Original post by billydisco
So we spent (equivalent of) billions on this "empire" thing, on the Navy, fighting more wars than the world put together, protecting our colonies, when it did not benefit us financially in any way?


Yes, the political elites were protecting their own. Back then the only people who had the vote were the landowners, hence those that were wealthy. We gained the public vote in the mid 1800s by 1900 our empire was almost gone. People understood that it was pointless spending money if it weren't going to help them so they demanded it be stopped. India and South Africa were colonies for much longer as they were productive so it much harder to get rid of them. However they also did little for non- landowners.

I wish people actually paid attention in History.
what motivates people to vote at all?
Original post by Alofleicester
So again, you just ignore a massive section of a life time of contribution in favour of one small mistake?

Take your typical £20k a year job. I could sack that person and find someone else to do it in no time at all. Guess what? That means the worker is very replaceable and not in the best employment position.

Original post by Alofleicester
Well because he worked hard for a quarter of a life span, he was made redundant through no fault of his own. Or do you believe he brought it upon himself?

I didnt say he is to blame for being redundant. I said he is to blame for having no qualifications and having a harder time finding a new job.


Original post by Alofleicester
Really? So you're advocating being a jack of all trades and a master of none? Experience should mean far more than qualifications.

No I am an advocate of having the basics (Maths, English, Sciences, possibly languages) and as an employer, I would value a student with A* in A Level Mathematics over somebody with 5 years experience working in a back office or a surf studies degree. I want somebody who can adapt and modify themselves- not someone who has to "train" specifically to do a job somebody with a good education could do easily.



Original post by Alofleicester
As opposed to the conservatives' save money now without considering the long term effect sort of policy?

Long term effect? When we're paying £70 billion a year in interest the long term effects of carrying on spending are FAR worse. We only kept our AAA rating because of austerity measures. We lose that then we cant borrow money on the capital markets and we're completely screwed! What would fund your leftie spending habits if the Government couldnt borrow on the money markets? Exactly.....

Original post by Alofleicester
Boy, I can see your point - I just think it's an evil, compassion-less belief created by a delusion of superiority.

But that's why I am a conservative and not deluded leftie. I am a realist, I know how life works and its not always pleasant- how do you think the Zebra feels about being eaten by the Lion? Isn't that un-compassionate? But it's nature....
Reply 236
Original post by billydisco
Can you please elaborate on equality? How the hell can you make humans equal when they're clearly not naturally?


'not naturally'?! all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others, right?

equality is everyone having a good standard of living, equal opportunities, equal access to education and healthcare. Equality is not ignoring the plight of millions to preserve the wealth of a few. Equality is justice and unity, working together to ensure that each one of us is healthy, safe, and free.
Reply 237
Original post by billydisco
No im just smarter and you're struggling to deal with it.



Where did I say I think they are below me? I just said they are far more replaceable. If they aren't so easily replaceable, how did the polish come here and suddenly start work as plumbers?



Really? So are you saying if binmen didn't exist, we would be physically unable to carry out waste to the tip?

Re builders and plumbers, ever heard of the term "DIY"?
What tips? who would create tips if their were no binmen? we would be crapping in the street. as for diy if you equate that with professional building work then you are a dingbat, i would love to see your efforts.

Since when did I disagree?


But Labour created this??

-They opened the floodgates to immigration in the 70s and 90/00s
-They said the two-parent family wasn't essential
-They closed all the grammar schools in inner cities
-They enforced political correctness so that youths would not respect authority

Immigration started in the fifties under the tories. two parent families are not essential. introducing a more balanced education system was an excellent idea. where is your respect when you use the term "I hate the ****ing labour party".

Im a tory, therefore I am a hard work and I can afford it :wink:


As for working hard you would'nt last a day on a building site.
Reply 238
Original post by ClassQuick
It may not have neen prefect but it was much better now. The middle class were much better off. Much bigger houses and a higher standard of living. Didnt have to pay to go to University, in fact you got a grant to help you go.

http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_national_debt

Look at this. See how our debt drops when socialism was introduced in after the war and the country nearly ends up in profit but then Thatcher introduces free market capitalism.

The only thing that is stopping the debt from rising massively is the constant sale of all Great Britain assets.

Our roads will go soon to a Chinese investment company.


If you really think the UK was better back then you're clueless. Even Labour today know their policies were terrible back then.
Original post by McSpoon
Pensioners had it easy? We'll just ignore the fact that many of them left school at 14/15, completed national service and worked their asses off for 40/50 years?

So why didn't they save their money for a rainy day? Oh, they're short termists.... (boy, the number of times Labour, leftie and short term come in the same sentence)

Original post by McSpoon
I'm proud to say that I voted 123 for my labour candidates in the local council elections as the tories will destroy this country.

Well to be honest, sitting in England I dont care. Soon Scotland will be independent and guess what? Labour will never get voted back into Wales/England again.


Original post by McSpoon
The rich deserve to be taxed, the poor deserve to be helped. We live in the 21st century, not the 16th

Can you please tell me why someone who works hard and ends up rich deserves to be taxed more than somebody who does nothing at school and ends up poor? What kind of signal are you sending out regarding hard work?

"Dont worry, do nothing and we'll still reward you"

Pretty much what Labour has done, isnt it?

Latest

Trending

Trending