You are Here: Home

# Quick Proof questions

Announcements Posted on
Talking about ISA/EMPA specifics is against our guidelines - read more here 28-04-2016

1. You are given that is a non-real root of the above equation, show that:

So I go:

3 roots are

And

Thus the sum of the roots must equal the coefficient of the which is 0 and so:

Is that good enough ? Any other ways ?
2. I assume you mean 1 + w + w^2 = 0?

The sum of the roots is acceptable I believe, but only if you have proved that 1, w and w^2 are the roots already. (which you did by saying what the 3 roots are, but you might have to do a little more to show that they are in fact the 3 roots of the equation)

Another way is to factorise z^3-1=0
into (z-1)(z^2+z+1) = 0 (you can figure this out the first time through polynomial division and then I think you can quote the result, at least you can in my system)
But w is non-real so w=/=1 so 1 + w + w^2 = 0
3. (Original post by Aeonstorm)
I assume you mean 1 + w + w^2 = 0?

The sum of the roots is acceptable I believe, but only if you have proved that 1, w and w^2 are the roots already. (which you did by saying what the 3 roots are, but you might have to do a little more to show that they are in fact the 3 roots of the equation)

Another way is to factorise z^3-1=0
into (z-1)(z^2+z+1) = 0 (you can figure this out the first time through polynomial division and then I think you can quote the result, at least you can in my system)
But w is non-real so w=/=1 so 1 + w + w^2 = 0
Ah yea, After finding the 3 roots I would let one non-real root be and then show that and so is also a root and then proceed as I did above.

I probably wouldn't have spotted your method and it would take too long for me to divide the thing by
4. (Original post by member910132)
Ah yea, After finding the 3 roots I would let one non-real root be and then show that and so is also a root and then proceed as I did above.

I probably wouldn't have spotted your method and it would take too long for me to divide the thing by
I recommend you ask your teacher whether you are allowed to quote the general result:

z^n -1 = (z-1)(z^(n-1) + z^(n-2) + z^(n-3) + ... + 1)

rather than actually deriving it each time. If you are allowed to, it is a slight bit quicker than showing that the roots are 1, w and w^2 and then using the sum of the roots. If not, your method is perfectly valid.
5. (Original post by Aeonstorm)
I recommend you ask your teacher whether you are allowed to quote the general result:

z^n -1 = (z-1)(z^(n-1) + z^(n-2) + z^(n-3) + ... + 1)

rather than actually deriving it each time. If you are allowed to, it is a slight bit quicker than showing that the roots are 1, w and w^2 and then using the sum of the roots. If not, your method is perfectly valid.
Self teaching FM lol, that's why I post about 3-4 questions in here a day.
6. (Original post by member910132)
Self teaching FM lol, that's why I post about 3-4 questions in here a day.
I also used this forum regularly when I self-taught FM. The combination of my textbooks and this forum was all I really needed.

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: May 5, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### How to predict exam questions

No crystal ball required

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams