Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

TORT: Duty of Care in 'Special Relationships'

Announcements Posted on
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Hi guys,

    When discussing the duty of care for negligence in cases of special relationships (doctor/patient, manufacturer/customer etc), is it necessary to still talk through the Caparo test etc or is it sufficient to state that this is an established duty situation, e.g. (Donoghue v Stephenson) for manufacturer/customer.

    Thanks!
    • 28 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    You should only ever apply the Caparo test in novel duty situations. If you can cite an authority where a duty of care has been established in a given type of situation, you don't need to bother with it.
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Thanks for getting back to me, that's very useful to know!
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by missemma91)
    Thanks for getting back to me, that's very useful to know!
    Also, if you can't think of the decided case for the duty, but it's is extremely obvious that there is a duty, say something like ''it is trite law that Marjorie, as a road user, owes Terry, a pedestrian, a duty of care..."
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    In general, what is really needed is to identify the central theme of the question in front of you, to determine how much to write on a particular issue.

    When discussing the duty of care for negligence in cases of special relationships (doctor/patient, manufacturer/customer etc), is it necessary to still talk through the Caparo test etc or is it sufficient to state that this is an established duty situation, e.g. (Donoghue v Stephenson) for manufacturer/customer.

    If it is about duty of care, then you will need to discuss the general principle, its application and various control devices to impose or deny a duty of care. However, a question may slant towards either Standard of Care or Causation, the issue of duty of care may be dismissed in no more than a paragraph why duty of care has arisen but you must before moving on. There should be a mark or two awarded here.

    At all times, you need to pay particular attention to policy reasoning when applying the judge-made laws.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 6, 2012
New on TSR

The future of apprenticeships

Join the discussion in the apprenticeships hub!

Article updates
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.