Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Proof by Induction

Announcements Posted on
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Yes ive got it now its quite a nice question once you complete it
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    (Original post by Mr M)
    I suggested expanding it all for a reason, students with less ability than you struggle with anything but the simplest factorisation.
    I hadn't noticed you'd suggested that. The reason I wasn't keen to suggest expanding everything is that (as in raheem94's post) you get a lot of terms, and I'm not convinced that manipulating those would be easier than keeping it 'as factorized as possible' whilst doing the working.

    I could perhaps have been clearer about the +1 not being included in the common factor, though. (But I did mention it in a previous post.)
    • 388 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by nuodai)
    I hadn't noticed you'd suggested that. The reason I wasn't keen to suggest expanding everything is that (as in raheem94's post) you get a lot of terms, and I'm not convinced that manipulating those would be easier than keeping it 'as factorized as possible' whilst doing the working.
    You only get 5 terms?!
    • 46 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by nuodai)
    I hadn't noticed you'd suggested that. The reason I wasn't keen to suggest expanding everything is that (as in raheem94's post) you get a lot of terms, and I'm not convinced that manipulating those would be easier than keeping it 'as factorized as possible' whilst doing the working.

    I could perhaps have been clearer about the +1 not being included in the common factor, though. (But I did mention it in a previous post.)
    I like to look at the final answer i should get, and try to expand it, to see which steps i need to do to get the answer.
    • 388 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    \frac{1}{4}(3^k (2k-1) + 1 + 4(k+1)3^k)

    \frac{1}{4}(3^k \times 2k - 3^k + 1 + 4k \times 3^k + 4 \times 3^k)

    \frac{1}{4}(3^k \times 6k + 1 +  3 \times 3^k)

    \frac{1}{4}(3^k ( 6k + 3)+ 1)

    and home.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    (Original post by Mr M)
    You only get 5 terms?!
    I think this must be a matter of style that varies from person to person. I find it much easier to make mistakes when I have a collection of terms that look similar (owing, for example, to having common factors) than I do by keeping the common factors out of the manipulation as much as possible. I suppose others might find it hard to look at an expression with lots of brackets and separate in their minds what stays the same and what doesn't.

    (Original post by Mr M)
    \frac{1}{4}(3^k (2k-1) + 1 + 4(k+1)3^k)

    \frac{1}{4}(3^k \times 2k - 3^k + 1 + 4k \times 3^k + 4 \times 3^k)

    \frac{1}{4}(3^k \times 6k + 1 +  3 \times 3^k)

    \frac{1}{4}(3^k ( 6k + 3)+ 1)

    and home.
    \dfrac{1}{4}(3^k (2k-1) + 1 + 4(k+1)3^k)

    =\dfrac{1}{4}( 3^k(2k-1+4(k+1)) + 1)

    =\dfrac{1}{4}( 3^k(2k-1+4k+4) + 1)

    =\dfrac{1}{4}( 3^k(6k+3) + 1)

    Like I say, matter of style.
    • 388 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by nuodai)
    I think this must be a matter of style that varies from person to person. I find it much easier to make mistakes when I have a collection of terms that look similar (owing, for example, to having common factors) than I do by keeping the common factors out of the manipulation as much as possible. I suppose others might find it hard to look at an expression with lots of brackets and separate in their minds what stays the same and what doesn't.
    Common factors is by far the best method. Weaker students are unable to do it though but they often can experience success by expanding, collecting like terms and then factorising.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    (Original post by Mr M)
    Common factors is by far the best method. Weaker students are unable to do it though but they often can experience success by expanding, collecting like terms and then factorising.
    I think I'll have to bow to your superior experience on this one. I suppose it can't hurt for the OP to see two equivalent methods.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 7, 2012
New on TSR

The future of apprenticeships

Join the discussion in the apprenticeships hub!

Article updates
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.