You know most movies are coming out in 3D now right, I just want to know your view on 3D movies compared to 2D movies.
I don't think movie technology is good enough yet to make a substantial income currently and as such, typically go and see 2D movies. Although, I have seen 2 movies that was good in 3D which are Beowolf and Avatar (James Cameron version).
So, if there is a movie out and you have a choice of seeing it in 2D or 3D, which would you chose and why?
3D films just give me a headache. If i go see them I have to watch it without the glasses, and so it's just like watching a fuzzy film. I need to get round to buying Hank Green's 2D glasses: what a great idea.
I was all for 3D going in to watching Avatar at IMAX a couple of years ago. Admittedly it was enjoyable enough, but since then my love for 3D has plumetted. Every single experience has been annoying. 3D is darker, headache inducing, annoying and gimicky. I would actually pay extra to watch 2D!
IMAX 2D is the way forward-- giant screens whilst retaining resolution and better sound creates a more immersive experience. IMAX looks awesome on those wide landscape shots (TDK was awesome).
3D movies are overrated, but there are some pretty awesome movies like "Avatar" that are worthwhile to be watched in 3D. Hoping "The Hobbit" (in theaters, December 2012) will be an epic movie and change the 3D industry. But for now, 2D is still better than 3D.
I'd see a 3D film, only if it was filmed in 3D, not horrifically converted like Alice in Wonderland or Deathly Hallows part 2 and if it was something I felt could benefit from 3D. Otherwise 2D all the way.