FP3 Limits Q
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Re: FP3 Limits QI don't think that particular expansion helps a lot - in fact, it's not even valid as you're considering large x whilst it's only valid for(Original post by member910132)
Q:

My working thus far:

then

then

and I am pretty much stuck from here.
Thnx
. I would start again and multiply the limit by
.
Last edited by Farhan.Hanif93; 08-05-2012 at 15:15. -
Re: FP3 Limits QBut then I end up with(Original post by Farhan.Hanif93)
I don't think that particular expansion helps a lot - in fact, it's not even valid as you're considering large x whilst it's only valid for
. I would start again and multiply the limit by
.

and I can't expand the bottom again because
and the expansion won't be valid for that.
-
Re: FP3 Limits QIf I go ahead with this then does the limit change to(Original post by f1mad)
Trick: let x= 1/y.
?
As then I can validly expand
?
-
Re: FP3 Limits QNote that(Original post by member910132)
But then I end up with

and I can't expand the bottom again because
and the expansion won't be valid for that.
and bring that new factor of
into the square root in the denominator. Things do simplify to a position to take the limit.
If you wanted to use binomial expansion from the start, you could have noted
, which is valid for
and hence will do the trick.
Last edited by Farhan.Hanif93; 08-05-2012 at 15:33. -
Re: FP3 Limits QIf(Original post by Farhan.Hanif93)
Note that
and bring that new factor of
into the square root in the denominator. Things do simplify to a position to take the limit.
If you wanted to use binomial expansion from the start, you could have noted
, which is valid for
and hence will do the trick.
then
so how did you get
?
-
Re: FP3 Limits QI just have a few concerns,(Original post by f1mad)
Yes that becomes the limit.
Then you get:
(1/y^2 + 3/y)^1/2 -> (1/y^2(1+ 3y))^1/2
->((1/y)^2(1+ 3y))^1/2 -1/y it'll drop out fairly easily now.
This is my first time doing FP3 and so I don't have the mathematical intuition you guys have, so how on earth was I supposed to think of

even after that, we get

which is fine, but I could have turned that into either of

and you will only get the correct answer of
if you chose the second one.
So my point is how on earth was I supposed to think of all of that ? Is it likely the question would have at least said let
? F1, why dod you think of that substitution ? What made you think of it ?
Secondly then, should I make a habit of remembering that if
then the expansions only valid for
can't be used ? In fact, F1 is it this that made you use the substitution ? So you could justify the binomial series ?
Could you go into the "Note that(Original post by Farhan.Hanif93)
Note that
and bring that new factor of
into the square root in the denominator. Things do simplify to a position to take the limit.
If you wanted to use binomial expansion from the start, you could have noted
, which is valid for
and hence will do the trick.
and bring that new factor of
into the square root in the denominator." in more detail, I don't really understand ?
Last edited by member910132; 08-05-2012 at 16:00. -
Re: FP3 Limits QSo do the sings change when:(Original post by f1mad)
When taking the reciprocal, you have to reverse the inequality signs.
1. taking the reciprocals
2. multiplying/dividing by -ve number ?
Any others I should be aware of ?
Edit:
but how can something be smaller than -1 and bigger than 1 ?
Last edited by member910132; 08-05-2012 at 16:06. -
Re: FP3 Limits Q

So we have(Original post by member910132)
Could you go into the "Note that
and bring that new factor of
into the square root in the denominator." in more detail, I don't really understand ?
.
Can you take the limit now? -
Re: FP3 Limits QLeaving aside this confusion of mine about the range of validity,(Original post by Farhan.Hanif93)
If you wanted to use binomial expansion from the start, you could have noted
, which is valid for
and hence will do the trick.
after expanding it all I get to:
and that doesn't give me the answer of 3/2 as x -> infty.
-
Re: FP3 Limits QThat's not quite correct. It looks like you've forgotten about the factor of x on the outside of the binomial expansion. Once you multiply that in, the result follows.(Original post by member910132)
Leaving aside this confusion of mine about the range of validity,
after expanding it all I get to:
and that doesn't give me the answer of 3/2 as x -> infty.