Advancing phys. G492 May 2012 pre-release!
Physics exam discussion - share revision tips in preparation for GCSE, A Level and other physics exams and discuss how they went afterwards.
-
Advancing phys. G492 May 2012 pre-release!
OCR B Physics students, I hope you are aware of the pre-release article for the G492 exam on the 25th May.
*edit 4*
Just another minor update. Included the majority of the recommened CD definitions of calibration and uncertainty.
Please check the link in the second post, for two sets of possible questions.
Also I have obtained a few predicted questions from a friend, I plan to upload these tomorrowLast edited by Andy16; 19-05-2012 at 14:01. -
Re: Advancing phys. G492 May 2012 pre-release!
There are two sets of possible questions at the bottom of this page, which I found really useful to get me thinking about the ideas of the article.
http://83.170.93.38/~matthew/mod/res...ndex.php?id=62 -
Re: Advancing phys. G492 May 2012 pre-release!Ah thank you very much! + rep(Original post by annamackenzie)
There are two sets of possible questions at the bottom of this page, which I found really useful to get me thinking about the ideas of the article.
http://83.170.93.38/~matthew/mod/res...ndex.php?id=62
If only my school could provide such good resources haha
-
Re: Advancing phys. G492 May 2012 pre-release!Thanks for uploading. Not read it yet, but I'm sure it's useful.(Original post by Andy16)
OCR B Physics students, I hope you are aware of the pre-release article for the G492 exam on the 25th May.
*edit 3* I haven't been very productive, but I've made some notes on article 3.
Please check the link in the second post, for two sets of possible questions.
Also I have obtained a few predicted questions from a friend, I plan to upload these tomorrow -
Re: Advancing phys. G492 May 2012 pre-release!Quick question for you;(Original post by When you see it...)
Thanks for uploading. Not read it yet, but I'm sure it's useful.
When measuring a single quantity, i.e. the length of a wire with a ruler, is the resolution of the ruler one half of the smallest measurable value, or just the smallest measurable value?
My teacher seemed to suggest that with something like a ruler (and probably an ammeter), because you can tell the halfway point between two 'notches', the resolution is a half of the smallest measureable value e.g. 1/2 of 1mm.
Do you think he is wrong? Also is the uncertainty caused by the resolution +/- the smallest measureable value, or +/- one half of the smallest measureable value? thanks. -
Re: Advancing phys. G492 May 2012 pre-release!If you can read (confidently) halfway between the two smallest scale divisions, then the halfway point is the smallest measurable value and if you can't, then the difference between the scale divisions is the smallest measurable value. I think anyway. So therefore you always use the smallest measurable value, it's just that sometimes this value is half of what you might think (i.e. half the scal division). I could well be talking *******s, so anyone reading this feel free to correct.(Original post by Andy16)
Quick question for you;
When measuring a single quantity, i.e. the length of a wire with a ruler, is the resolution of the ruler one half of the smallest measurable value, or just the smallest measurable value?
My teacher seemed to suggest that with something like a ruler (and probably an ammeter), because you can tell the halfway point between two 'notches', the resolution is a half of the smallest measureable value e.g. 1/2 of 1mm.
Do you think he is wrong? Also is the uncertainty caused by the resolution +/- the smallest measureable value, or +/- one half of the smallest measureable value? thanks.
As for digital instruments, the resolution is half of the smallest change displayed (i.e. if the ammeter goes up in 0.01 A increments, the resolution is 0.005 A because for any given value, it could be plus or minus 0.005 A bigger or smaller than the value displayed - the displayed value is rounded).
Now that I think about it, the two paragraphs I just wrote are a bit contradictory. I too would like it if someone could clarify! -
Re: Advancing phys. G492 May 2012 pre-release!BTW I think it is just +/- the resolution, although it was different for chemistry. Who knows? Lets wait until someone else responds before we decide what is correct.(Original post by Andy16)
Also is the uncertainty caused by the resolution +/- the smallest measureable value, or +/- one half of the smallest measureable value? thanks.
If only my school could provide such good resources haha