Rochdale grooming trial: Nine found guilty of child sex charges

Absolute scum. Imagine the uproar if a white person did this in a muslim dominated country. There would be chopped of heads everywhere.

Deport them all. Let Saudi Arabia or whatever deal with them.

Preparation of a minor with intention of sex. E.g. Arranging a meeting with an underage person with the intention of sex.

Example scenario: An adult arranges a meeting with a minor via a chat room with the intention of having sex with the minor (It's the same charge with or without consent of sex).

ADD: Good Bloke beat me to it. 2 Posts above.

Nvm, just double checked, It's talking about the initial case, the girls testimony wasn't considered credible (according to the Jury).

I guess that's why they won't take exaggerations as an option this time round.



I think it was wrong for him to blame a whole race for the actions of a few.

A judge today said nine men preyed on white girls as young as 13 for sex 'because they were not part of your community or religion' as he jailed them for a total of 77 years.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2141279/Rochdale-child-sex-trial-As-9-men-face-jail-grooming-girls-did-listen-victim.html#ixzz1uP2h97gm

The guy's clearly putting religion and race into it.

Funny really, Nick Griffin highlighted the ongoing grooming of underage girls for sex by Pakistani men years ago and was called a racist for it and vilified in the media.

Unsurprisingly, it turns out Mr Griffin was correct.

Funny really, Nick Griffin highlighted the ongoing grooming of underage girls for sex by Pakistani men years ago and was called a racist for it and vilified in the media.

Unsurprisingly, it turns out Mr Griffin was correct.

Why do these minors keep agreeing to meet up with strangers on the internet for sex?

Quite frankly it's simply a sociological/psychological issue. The victims were described as "From broken homes".

Victims would probably be seeking abode in a stranger as a family figure because the biological family was incapable of providing them with their needs.

Well, that's just one theory..

Mohammed Sajid, 35, of Rochdale, was sentenced to 12 years for rape, six years for conspiracy, one year for trafficking and six years, all concurrent, for sexual activity with a child.
Known as 'Saj', he would regularly ply victims with alcohol before having sex with them at his flat, where groups of men would gather and 'pass around' the girls. He will be deported back to Pakistan following the conclusion of his sentence.

Illegal immigrant Hamid Safi, 22, of no fixed address, was jailed for four years for conspiracy and one year, concurrently, for trafficking.
He sneaked into the UK on a lorry in 2008 and claimed to have fled Afghanistan because his uncle was murdered by the Taliban. He was released from a detention centre in Birmingham in March 2009 when he moved to Rochdale.
Safi will be deported back to Afghanistan following his sentence.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2141279/Rochdale-child-sex-trial-As-9-men-face-jail-grooming-girls-did-listen-victim.html#ixzz1uP2h97gm

Possibly the best news to come out of this disgusting story!!!!!

So these strangers were satisfying their sociological/psychological needs?

Thats the evil dragon in the room that is political correctness. See the BBC still referring to the BNP as 'far right', and portraying it as similar creed to a terrorist organisation.

Morons.

Why are you so bigoted, ill informed and half witted?

He said that because its true, a British Pakistani himself had admitted it (not just one either), no one blamed a whole race they all said the Pakistani community need to speak up instead of burying their heads in the sand to protect their so called 'honour' which after this story is going to be practically non existant to the majority of the GBP. BBC News had an Iman and another pakistani origin man telling the community they condemn these actions.

I know you are meant/want to be an islamic martyr (although you give Islam an awful name), but you are very ignorant and deliberately blind if you cannot see this is an issue that needs to be tackled.

Quite frankly it's simply a sociological/psychological issue. The victims were described as "From broken homes".

Victims would probably be seeking abode in a stranger as a family figure because the biological family was incapable of providing them with their needs.

Well, that's just one theory..

No, it was the British Pakistan head of prosecution who declared it not credible.

Nazir Afzal, chief crown prosecutor for the North West, said: "In relation to that victim I can understand her concerns. I do more than that, I regret those concerns and I would apologise to her personally.

"I recognise the lawyer who dealt with the decision back in 2008 formed a view about whether a jury would believe her. I take a different view."

In July 2009 a CPS lawyer decided not to charge the two men because he thought a jury would not find her ‘credible’ despite police finding three separate samples of Hassan’s DNA in her underwear.

The police also failed to appeal against this decision and girls continued to be abused by the gang until more allegations came to light in 2010.

The botched inquiry is being investigated by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

Mr Afzal said the decision not to proceed occurred before his arrival in the region, however after taking up his post he reviewed the case and decided to overturn the ‘wrong’ as he believed the victim was ‘entirely credible’.