Just one sec...
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Co-prime Notation

Announcements Posted on
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Quick question. Say you're proving \sqrt 3 is irrational or something similar, can you express \mathrm{gcd(a,b)=1} as a  \perp  b? We weren't taught the notation, so not sure if I'm using it correctly.
    Offline

    I've never seen it before, but Wikipedia appears to use it. Personally I write (a,b) instead of \text{gcd}(a,b), and so I'd just write (a,b)=1. Little confusion will be caused by this notation in a number theoretic context.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by nuodai)
    I've never seen it before, but Wikipedia appears to use it. Personally I write (a,b) instead of \text{gcd}(a,b), and so I'd just write (a,b)=1. Little confusion will be caused by this notation in a number theoretic context.
    Ah, I thought it might be standard notation and wanted the proof to look a bit more professional. Perhaps I should stick to the former if he hasn't taught it this way.
    Offline

    (Original post by Brit_Miller)
    Ah, I thought it might be standard notation and wanted the proof to look a bit more professional. Perhaps I should stick to the former if he hasn't taught it this way.
    If you're doing something for uni (e.g. exam, coursework), don't introduce notation which isn't in your course unless you explain what it is first. If you were to say "write a \perp b to denote \text{gcd}(a,b)=1" then that would be fine, but you shouldn't assume that an examiner will know what you mean if the notation isn't introduced in your lecture notes.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by nuodai)
    If you're doing something for uni (e.g. exam, coursework), don't introduce notation which isn't in your course unless you explain what it is first. If you were to say "write a \perp b to denote \text{gcd}(a,b)=1" then that would be fine, but you shouldn't assume that an examiner will know what you mean if the notation isn't introduced in your lecture notes.
    Aye, I'll definitely just use the former. Thanks for the help!
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Brit_Miller)
    Ah, I thought it might be standard notation and wanted the proof to look a bit more professional. Perhaps I should stick to the former if he hasn't taught it this way.
    Professional mathematical writing eschews excessive symbology. It is a common mistake of the amateur to try and abbreviate everything. Nothing looks worse than, for example, statements abbreviated like the following: \forall a,b \in \mathbb{Z}, \exists ! c \in \mathbb{Z} \mbox{ such that... } etc.

    Just write 'a and b are coprime.'
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jake22)
    Professional mathematical writing eschews excessive symbology. It is a common mistake of the amateur to try and abbreviate everything. Nothing looks worse than, for example, statements abbreviated like the following: \forall a,b \in \mathbb{Z}, \exists ! c \in \mathbb{Z} \mbox{ such that... } etc.

    Just write 'a and b are coprime.'
    Why do they teach us to write like that then? :confused:
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Brit_Miller)
    Why do they teach us to write like that then? :confused:
    For the purpose of making short hand notes or writing on blackboards. Quantifiers also have their use in defining, say, a predicated set that involves more than one quantifier.

    I mean, you were presumably taught at primary school that one can abbreviate 'and' by using the ampersand symbol. I am sure that you were also made aware that in an essay or suchlike, you were still expected to use the full word 'and' rather than '&'. Same rules apply.

    I don't think that anyone would suggest that you hand in a piece of written work with, for example, sentences that start with symbols.

    Look in any maths book. They mostly use words - not just a collection of symbols. In the statement of lemmata, propositions and theorems in particular, one tends to use symbols and abbreviations only where it saves a lot of space and makes for increased readability.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jake22)
    For the purpose of making short hand notes or writing on blackboards. Quantifiers also have their use in defining, say, a predicated set that involves more than one quantifier.

    I mean, you were presumably taught at primary school that one can abbreviate 'and' by using the ampersand symbol. I am sure that you were also made aware that in an essay or suchlike, you were still expected to use the full word 'and' rather than '&'. Same rules apply.

    I don't think that anyone would suggest that you hand in a piece of written work with, for example, sentences that start with symbols.

    Look in any maths book. They mostly use words - not just a collection of symbols. In the statement of lemmata, propositions and theorems in particular, one tends to use symbols and abbreviations only where it saves a lot of space and makes for increased readability.
    Our lecturer actually encouraged us to write our proofs using all the shorthand notation - though they're only short proofs. Maybe it's just to make sure we understand what they mean and use them correctly.
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Brit_Miller)
    Our lecturer actually encouraged us to write our proofs using all the shorthand notation - though they're only short proofs. Maybe it's just to make sure we understand what they mean and use them correctly.
    I would guess that your last sentence is the motivation - he is treating it as an exercise in familiarising yourselves with the notation.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register
  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 9, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Poll
Should the UK have more bank holidays?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Study resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22

Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.