US forced to admit Yemen 'Al Qaeda bomber' was actually a CIA operative

Someone needs to revise the English language. If you are a foreigner and English is your 2nd or 3rd language, I'm sorry.


Osama's son was murdered (as well as many others) therefore, his family was murdered. Just because some of his family still survive does not detract from the fact that his family was murdered.

And what you need to learn is that the context of the sentence changes a words meaning.

"His family was murdered" suggests all his family were murdered(also you should of used were instead of was.

"Part of his family were murdered" would of been better English and what you should of said.

And what you need to learn is that the context of the sentence changes a words meaning.

"His family was murdered" suggests all his family were murdered(also you should of used were instead of was.

"Part of his family were murdered" would of been better English and what you should of said.


Also about conspiracies, one reason I don't believe most of them is it would be so hard to hide all the tracks. Explained in this bbc article today about lone gunmen - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17996498 . When there are a lot of people working on something there is intelligence to see but for one person it can be easy to hide your intentions.

No, the CIA forms part of the government apparatus to exercise state-sanctioned use of force. Being allied to a government doesn't preclude you from being a terrorist neither

Palestine is not recognized as a state but as a territory. Hence, they are labelled a terrorist organization as they do not have a mandate for the use of force.

There has been no evidence relating to false-flag operations in the United States security framework.

Not sure how you have the effort to even acknowledge these unrelenting conspiracy nuts. Ran out of that a long time ago

It is quite rare for the US to be forced to do anything nowadays. They are the only remaining superpower.

Oh dear .

The only person that needs "to revise the English language" is you mate!

*Credit to Pads for taking the time to respond to a complete buffoon of a post.

Oh and: Family- "A group of people united in criminal activity".

Fits very nicely indeed .

It's "you're" a massive terrorist. Not "your". And it's "defended", not "defeneded" whatever that means.
Also it's not "Quatada". No such person exists. It's "Qatada".

Anyway, where am I defending anyone? Are you getting a bit confused with another thread?
Not sure how you managed to infer that from me paraphrasing the articles. Read/spell carefully.

Good one Especially coming from someone who doesn't know what the word "family" means.

Buffoon of a post?

You can't respond intelligently, because you don't have anything intelligent to say. You'll just attempt to ridicule something you don't understand because it doesn't conform to your sheltered world-view. Please educate yourself before embarrassing yourself further, I hope you take this as a valuable lesson.

Anyway, where am I defending anyone? Are you getting a bit confused with another thread?
Not sure how you managed to infer that from me paraphrasing the articles. Read/spell carefully.

You is bare 'ard.

As Pads rightly said; you're the one who cannot understand what "family" means. You can continue bitching about the semantics of the context in which that word should be used.

Bottom line is you were wrong, now shut up about it.

Thanks for admitting it. If you haven't already noticed; everyone here views you as one.

. The only one that needs educating is you.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1976994&highlight=qatada+stefan1991

Good night!

How do you know of this agenda?



What conspiracy?
Your conspiracy is based completely on statements CIA officials have told you. It's like asking Harold Shipman if he's a good doctor. Would you accept what any criminal told you what happened on face value and without question?

Through various events that have happened throughout the world, through news stories from multiple outlets in multiple countries of multiple political persuasions, through talking to people that support such acts and seeing for myself on the internet evidence of such people, through talking to members of the Forces who have first hand experience with bomb making labs and who are friends of people who have had contact with SFSG and Anti-terror squads.

So what you're trying to say is, the mainstream accepted narrative is the conspiracy...and what you have made up is the truth?

By definition the "mainstream accepted" narrative is a conspiracy theory. It's a theory whose only source of proof is the word of the CIA officials who were themselves involved in the conspiracy to bomb planes.

You're saying because the CIA said it's true, it is. If they say their narrative is true, everyone must immediately accept it as the infallible truth because there's no way an authority would ever twist the truth How naive. Do you blindingly and naively accept anything that's told to you like a little child?

You need to look up the definition of conspiracy. The CIA you trust so much is by definition a conspiracy. Using covert actions and secret plans, many of which are of the most unsavory kind. What are covert operations if not conspiracies? At the same time, the CIA is an institution, a structural part of the national security state. In sum, the agency is an institutionalized conspiracy, with a long history of lies, deceit, murder, assassination, torture, false flag terrorism and human experimentation.

And what I have made up? I haven't made anything up. Point to one thing I've made up. I only shoot documented facts.

Once again, looking at the given narrative, the framework of evidence, motive and history.

And you have taken what exactly to create your narrative? Again, I'll ask you to clarify, because from what I can see you are rejecting everything logical and, not putting anything in it's place

I haven't made up any type of narrative, idiot. All I'm doing is analysing and critiquing the CIA establishment narrative. Taking any suggestion made as truth without question isn't logical in the slightest. You are kidding yourself if you think it is.

Why are you so gullible to believe any narrative which is given to you like a little sheep when we know as fact that narratives are routinely established to fit an agenda and mislead us? Use your brain.

Sheeple: "The term is used to describe those who voluntarily acquiesce to a suggestion without critical analysis or research."

"people who tend to accept and take statements at face value, especially if it is cited in mainstream media"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheeple

Once again I'm going to ask you to clarify your narrative.

Come now, it shouldn't be that hard, clearly you can't accept the accepted one, so clarify yours. Tell me what you think happened.

I don't know what happened. I'm not the one pretending they do. That's you my friend.

I never said I didn't accept it. I'm saying I'm not accepting it without question. Like you.



"the facts are what I am going on, based on what appears to have happened and what the CIA and press have told us"
Yes, the Criminals Impersonating Authority and the MainStream-Media, the ultimate purveyors of infallible truth!

Please.

I see. So you're admitting you have no idea what happened, but you;re sure it can't be what seems to have happened? I see. Now, to most people, you're the conspiracy nut here

And I question, my dear, but the salient point is what the CIA and media have said makes sense, and until such a time as evidence comes to light to challenge this version of event, I am happy that my questions have been satisfied and I am willing to accept the version presented to us, whilst of course accepting that we will not have been told the whole truth.

Admit you have no idea what really happened either, then you will actually be making some progress in how you form your beliefs.

A good historian checks his sources and assesses their credibility before taking anything they say as the infallible truth. As I've already pointed out, your sources are consistent liars and deceivers, who have consistently in the past lied about these types of things.

Yet you are willing to believe whatever they say and without question, which makes you a gullible idiot.

You talk as if the CIA was not from it's very inception designed to be a propaganda machine. You really do need to read some history because you are lacking in basic knowledge.


So you only believe conspiracy theories which the CIA tells you to believe... even though by definition the CIA is an institutionalised conspiracy. The idiocy I encounter on these forums is sometimes palpable.



I'd prefer if you didn't enjoy addressing me as if I was your wife, I don't wish to participate in your strange and sordid fantasies.

So you believe anything which "makes sense"... A lot of things "make sense". Doesn't mean they are true. The narrative of 9/11 being an inside job makes more sense than the official one, that doesn't mean it's true. You are an idiot if you don't question or challenge anything you're told unless your superior comes along and tells you believe something else.

Oh my dear, you do need to calm down. People like you are so funny, the ones that think they alone see the true world, that everyone else is a sheep, it's comedy. It really is. :')

I'll repeat myself once more. The narrative given by the CIA and media, in tandem with the facts we have tally.

Looking at the history and motives behind why terror groups attack the West and previous operations similar to this one, things tally. And yes, even taking into account the sordid history of the CIA, a version of the official explanation seems the most plausable at this time. I have questioned, I have looked at the story. In fact I dare say I've questioned just a little harder than you

You're line of thinking seems to be 'They've lied before, they're certainly lieing about everything right damn now!' Rather than properly examining motives, the MO of international intelligence agencies and so on. Again, it's funny.

And I would just like to point out once again the hilarity of you essentially stating 'I have no idea what happened, but it sure as heck can't be anything like what they said because they don't alway tell the truth, and sometimes, sometimes they even totally lie!'