You are Here: Home

# FP3 Limits, Is My Answer Sufficient ?

Announcements Posted on
Uni student? You could win a Samsung Galaxy S7 or £500 of travel vouchers by taking this quick survey 05-05-2016
Talking about ISA/EMPA specifics is against our guidelines - read more here 28-04-2016
1. Q:

Show that

I go:

As

Hence as the denominator tends towards then clearly

Would that suffice as a valid answer ?

Secondly, and I would highly appreciate it if people could also answer this so that is completes my knowledge in the topic, if we have

then obviously that is undetermined, but if we have

then can it be said that as

?

Am I wright in thinking we can't write

because the limiting value must be finite and so we write

or

as

Thnx
2. Bump, anyone ?
3. Hi, firstly, it's fine to write that lim x ->0 1/x = infinity, or rather it would be if it were true (consider a limit approaching from the negative numbers (1/-1, 1/-0.1, 1/-0.01, ...)

You're saved in this limit because you're restricted to x>0 'cause of the lnx.

Edit: The edits are because I massively misread your post, sorry about that.
4. (Original post by Jodin)
Hi, firstly, it's fine to write that lim x ->0 1/x = infinity, or rather it would be if it were true (consider a limit approaching from the negative numbers (1/-1, 1/-0.1, 1/-0.01, ...)

You're saved in this limit because you're restricted to x>0 'cause of the lnx.

Edit: The edits are because I massively misread your post, sorry about that.
Right, so is my answer to the first part of the question correct and sufficient ?
5. (Original post by member910132)
Q:

Show that

I go:

As

Hence as the denominator tends towards then clearly

Would that suffice as a valid answer ?
No. or are undefined.
Arranging F(x)

So if the form of the limit will be
like
Use the L'Hospital rule.

Secondly, and I would highly appreciate it if people could also answer this so that is completes my knowledge in the topic, if we have

then obviously that is undetermined,
..depending on the number set you are using.
For calculating limit we can use an extension of Reals including infinte ordinals
that is
In this set and

and f.e.
but if we have

then can it be said that as

?
AS I noted above if we have

and through the positive reals or
through the negative reals
are two cases.
For the first
for the second

that is the
limit is not exists.
Am I wright in thinking we can't write

because the limiting value must be finite and so we write

or

as

Thnx
No. This limit is not exists in this form (in your Q x>0 because of lnx)

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
your full birthday is required
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: May 9, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Study resources
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.