Hey there Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Monday May 14 2012 - CIE Physics Paper 4

Announcements Posted on
Study Help needs new mods! 14-04-2014
Post on TSR and win a prize! Find out more... 10-04-2014
    • Thread Starter
    • 11 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    So, just thought I'd create this thread for all us CIE students to discuss the exam after we've done it.

    Just a note, you'll should not post up answers here to the exam paper until the very next day.

    So how's everyone's revision going ?
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ari Ben Canaan)
    So, just thought I'd create this thread for all us CIE students to discuss the exam after we've done it.

    Just a note, you'll should not post up answers here to the exam paper until the very next day.

    So how's everyone's revision going ?
    Lol. I will try to avoid discussing it until my exams are over. Anyway, done with physics already, revising chemistry. :holmes:
    • Thread Starter
    • 11 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zishi)
    Lol. I will try to avoid discussing it until my exams are over. Anyway, done with physics already, revising chemistry. :holmes:
    Cool stuff. I'm just going through things one last time.

    Just got to remain calm and composed now !
    • Thread Starter
    • 11 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zishi)
    Lol. I will try to avoid discussing it until my exams are over. Anyway, done with physics already, revising chemistry. :holmes:
    You remember that question in May 2009 Paper 4 ?

    Question 9.... Do you understand how they got the answer to the last part ?
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ari Ben Canaan)
    You remember that question in May 2009 Paper 4 ?

    Question 9.... Do you understand how they got the answer to the last part ?
    Yeah, the 0.92 is N/No. No is 0.98 times 3.5x10^2 and N is 0.9 times 3.5x10^5. Do you get it?
    • Thread Starter
    • 11 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zishi)
    Yeah, the 0.92 is N/No. No is 0.98 times 3.5x10^2 and N is 0.9 times 3.5x10^5. Do you get it?
    No, unfortunately :/
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ari Ben Canaan)
    No, unfortunately :/
    It talks about the uncertainty. 2% means that during first time interval the 2% of the nuclei decay and 98% remain. That's why we multiply the initial number of nuclei by 0.98 to get the nuclei we have. And for the maximum uncertainty of 10%,the 10% of original nuclei should have decayed and so at that time we'll have 90% of the initial nuclei. That's how I have done it. Mark scheme changes it directly to 92% for further calculation.
    • Thread Starter
    • 11 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zishi)
    It talks about the uncertainty. 2% means that during first time interval the 2% of the nuclei decay and 98% remain. That's why we multiply the initial number of nuclei by 0.98 to get the nuclei we have. And for the maximum uncertainty of 10%,the 10% of original nuclei should have decayed and so at that time we'll have 90% of the initial nuclei. That's how I have done it. Mark scheme changes it directly to 92% for further calculation.
    But that's a 2% uncertainty how does it imply a decay of nuclei ?
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ari Ben Canaan)
    But that's a 2% uncertainty how does it imply a decay of nuclei ?
    It means that there will be an error of 2% while measuring the count rate. So to make allowance for the error, I have assumed that 2% of it decays during the first time interval. Anyway, I don't think that my way is perfect(although it does give the correct answer), so I think you should make a thread about it in physics help forum.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Subbed

    From what I remember I took the initial as 100, the final as 92, and plugged it in the formula
    • Thread Starter
    • 11 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zishi)
    It means that there will be an error of 2% while measuring the count rate. So to make allowance for the error, I have assumed that 2% of it decays during the first time interval. Anyway, I don't think that my way is perfect(although it does give the correct answer), so I think you should make a thread about it in physics help forum.
    Any idea why the amplitude of the information signal has to be less than half the amplitude of the carrier wave ?
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ari Ben Canaan)
    Any idea why the amplitude of the information signal has to be less than half the amplitude of the carrier wave ?
    As the course book says, "the variation in amplitude at top would be confused with the variation in amplitude at bottom of the wave". Too bad that it doesn't say much more about it. :dontknow:
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ari Ben Canaan)
    Any idea why the amplitude of the information signal has to be less than half the amplitude of the carrier wave ?
    What variant will you be giving? 41, 42 or 43?
    • Thread Starter
    • 11 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zishi)
    What variant will you be giving? 41, 42 or 43?
    42. You ?
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ari Ben Canaan)
    42. You ?
    Same.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Anyone doing IGCSE?
    • Thread Starter
    • 11 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by YaaahSarah)
    Anyone doing IGCSE?
    This is an A Level thread :P

    I did my IGCSEs.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    mayn i'm getting 100 fo sho inshallah
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ari Ben Canaan)
    This is an A Level thread :P

    I did my IGCSEs.
    Ohh, sorry! *awkwardly exits*
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    can we discuss the answers for physcis 42 here?
    and does anyone put up the paper with solutions here?

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?

    this is what you'll be called on TSR

  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?

    never shared and never spammed

  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By completing the slider below you agree to The Student Room's terms & conditions and site rules

  2. Slide the button to the right to create your account

    Slide to join now Processing…

    You don't slide that way? No problem.

Updated: May 14, 2012
Article updates
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.