Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Quick Q on By Parts

Announcements Posted on
Have you had the experience of living with an eating disorder? Share your story here.. 06-03-2015
ISA/EMPA exam discussion on TSR 05-03-2015
  1. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    My question is that when you have by parts with limits, the how do you lay it out ? I can't find examples of this anywhere in my textbooks. Because we set up an intermediary form which has another integral in it, what limits does that have ?

    Which one of the following is the proper way of laying this out, feel free to post the proper way if it is none of the following.

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a


    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int 1\ dx \right]_b^a



\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx



\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right]_b^a

\



\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Thnx
  2. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    My question is that when you have by parts with limits, the how do you lay it out ? I can't find examples of this anywhere in my textbooks. Because we set up an intermediary form which has another integral in it, what limits does that have ?

    Which one of the following is the proper way of laying this out, feel free to post the proper way if it is none of the following.

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln x \ - x \right]_b^a


    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int 1\ dx \right]_b^a



\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx



\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right]_b^a

\



\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Thnx
    To my mind:
    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x]_b^a - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln x \ - x \right]_b^a
  3. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    My question is that when you have by parts with limits, the how do you lay it out ? I can't find examples of this anywhere in my textbooks. Because we set up an intermediary form which has another integral in it, what limits does that have ?

    Which one of the following is the proper way of laying this out, feel free to post the proper way if it is none of the following.

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a


    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int 1\ dx \right]_b^a



\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx



\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right]_b^a

\



\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Thnx
    The one that makes the most sense is the first one but they're pretty easy with letting you off on this kind of thing. Except for personally; I'd write it as

     [xln x]^a_b - \int^a_b 1 dx

    And I think that's the 'most correct' way of doing the first step.

    Also those implies signs are used incorrectly. You aren't implying anything - you just need a regular equals sign.


    EDIT: You've also missed the 'x' in 'lnx' a lot
  4. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hassi94)
    The one that makes the most sense is the first one but they're pretty easy with letting you off on this kind of thing. Except for personally; I'd write it as

     [xln x]^a_b - \int^a_b 1 dx

    And I think that's the 'most correct' way of doing the first step.

    Also those implies signs are used incorrectly. You aren't implying anything - you just need a regular equals sign.


    EDIT: You've also missed the 'x' in 'lnx' a lot
    Even in STEP are they easy about that ?

    They are \Rightarrows, but yea "=" should be used.

    I just missed 1 "x" in ln x, the rest was a copy paste job lol
  5. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    Even in STEP are they easy about that ?

    They are \Rightarrows, but yea "=" should be used.

    I just missed 1 "x" in ln x, the rest was a copy paste job lol
    \Rightarrow is an implication.
  6. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Int by parts is probably my least favourite topic in A level maths.

    Just can't work my head around it. :confused:
  7. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Slumpy)
    To my mind:
    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x]_b^a - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln x \ - x \right]_b^a

    (Original post by hassi94)
    The one that makes the most sense is the first one but they're pretty easy with letting you off on this kind of thing. Except for personally; I'd write it as

     [xln x]^a_b - \int^a_b 1 dx

    And I think that's the 'most correct' way of doing the first step.

    Also those implies signs are used incorrectly. You aren't implying anything - you just need a regular equals sign.


    EDIT: You've also missed the 'x' in 'lnx' a lot
    So you guys are saying that

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a - \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = \left[F(x) - G(x)  \right]_b^a ?
  8. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tamimi)
    Int by parts is probably my least favourite topic in A level maths.

    Just can't work my head around it. :confused:
    In this case the Q is actually  \int \ln x\ dx but we put the 1 in there to make it easier. u=ln x v'= 1 and proceed from there.
  9. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    So you guys are saying that

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a - \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = \left[F(x) - G(x)  \right]_b^a ?
    Yes that is true. Think about it;

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a = F(a) - F(b) and \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = G(a) - G(b)

    so

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a - \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = [F(a) - F(b)] - [G(a) - G(b)]

    = [F(a) - G(a)] - [F(b) - G(b)] = \left[F(x) - G(x)  \right]_b^a
  10. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    Even in STEP are they easy about that ?

    They are \Rightarrows, but yea "=" should be used.

    I just missed 1 "x" in ln x, the rest was a copy paste job lol
    Also yes from what I understand even in STEP they are fairly indifferent about it. Especially with subsitutions - sometimes it's not worth changing the limits of your integral (and just changing the results back to the original variable and subbing the original limits in is easier) so they don't mind if you have limits - stop having limits then have them again As long as you don't completely lose them for whatever reason.
  11. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    So you guys are saying that

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a - \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = \left[F(x) - G(x)  \right]_b^a ?
    Yeah. Tbh, I'd have left it as [xlnx]-[x], but I was in a rush in the morning and couldn't be bothered with paying attention to the latex:p:

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 11, 2012
2015 general election
New on TSR

Ask a Lib Dem MP your questions

Grill Norman Lamb MP about mental health

Article updates
Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.