Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey there! Sign in to have your say on this topicNew here? Join for free to post

Queen Accused of Money Launder/ Drug Trafficking.

Announcements Posted on
Become part of the Welcome Squad! Apply here! 28-10-2014
    • Thread Starter
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    lt's old news but it may prove a good talking point.

    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/233402.html
    • 25 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    The Queen doesn't own Coutts.
    • Thread Starter
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Addzter)
    The Queen doesn't own Coutts.
    Coutts is banker to the Queen. I think that's what they mean.
    • 13 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Martyn*)
    Coutts is banker to the Queen. I think that's what they mean.
    So if one of the Queen's gardeners molested someone, the Queen would be accused of sexual assault?
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Ah, Press TV
    • 5 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Press TV what do you expect? it is an Islamic news channel designed as propaganda against the West. To be honest she is probably worse than a drug trafficker, she profits off taxes that ordinary people pay - not that much about 70p per person but overwhelmingly - 85% of British population wants her to stay. BOOM
    • Thread Starter
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by patrickinator)
    Press TV what do you expect? it is an Islamic news channel designed as propaganda against the West. To be honest she is probably worse than a drug trafficker, she profits off taxes that ordinary people pay - not that much about 70p per person but overwhelmingly - 85% of British population wants her to stay. BOOM
    I think it was in the Guardian as well. I suppose you think the Guardian is also an Islamic news channel?
    • Thread Starter
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Psyk)
    So if one of the Queen's gardeners molested someone, the Queen would be accused of sexual assault?
    If it happened on her premises, and she knew that the gardener had a history of sexual criminality, then yes.
    • 8 followers
    Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Martyn*)
    If it happened on her premises, and she knew that the gardener had a history of sexual criminality, then yes.
    So basically outlaw rehabilitation because of the risk of committing crimes by hiring someone to work legit who then goes out and commits a crime on your property?
    • Thread Starter
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Snagprophet)
    So basically outlaw rehabilitation because of the risk of committing crimes by hiring someone to work legit who then goes out and commits a crime on your property?
    You'd rather have people commiting sexual abuse?
    • 8 followers
    Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Martyn*)
    You'd rather have people commiting sexual abuse?
    Sorry, you seem to be frowning on the concept of anyone with a criminal record getting a job.
    • Thread Starter
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Snagprophet)
    Sorry, you seem to be frowning on the concept of anyone with a criminal record getting a job.
    Just gardeners.
    • 8 followers
    Online

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Martyn*)
    Just gardeners.
    Well you'd think that there are more gardening candidates without criminal records.
    • 13 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Just to make it clear, I made up that example. As far as I know none of the Queen's gardeners molested anyone
    • 73 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Martyn*)
    I think it was in the Guardian as well. I suppose you think the Guardian is also an Islamic news channel?
    Never read CiF?
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Democracy)
    Never read CiF?
    CiF is full of feminists saying how the world's misogynistic because someone insulted Nadine Dorries. All anti-Western stuff gets buried.
    • 14 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    The Queen is not what she seems. As goes the old Sex Pistols lyric.

    "a Fascist regime" "they made you a moron" "she ain't no human being" "All crimes are paid."

    The Queen is of different stock from the common man. She considers herself and her family superior to everyday humans. She is unfeeling and cold-hearted with no capacity for normal human emotion. They see themselves as a separate breed of people superior to everyone else and believe that we only exist to sustain them.

    The Queen has been accused of being involved in child abduction and child abuse, as well as drug trafficking, with the money laundered through her bank, Coutts, and has been responsible for the enslavement of numerous peoples and complicit in genocide. The news of money laundering came after a French Presidential candidate accused her of owing her fortune to drugs money laundered by corrupt “bankers in The City" and that a "a part of her fortune comes from drug trafficking". Her family has a long history of drug trafficking going back to the 19th century, dealing with opium (used to make heroin) in China. It seems they never stopped. They actually went to war with China because the Chinese wanted to stop it. Then Afghanistan was invaded for the purpose of taking control of its vast opium poppy fields. They consider it their birthright to continue the traditions of their family. This is particularly alarming when it was revealed that eating human flesh was a family tradition. Their bloodlust knows no bounds.

    The Queen has been accused of covering up child abuse committed by family members, including the Queen mother, on the crown possession of Jersey (not part of the UK) and Lord Mountbatten - who had three young children with him on the boat when he was killed. Child abuse has been covered up by the establishment from Haut de la Garenne in Jersey to Hollie Grieg in Scotland committed by doctors, judges, police officers, social workers and politicians. Only a handful of people, best friend of Prince Andrew and benefactor to the Duchess of York Jeffrey Epstein who introduced his victims to Andrew, Paul Kidd the Royal Butler to the Queen who tooks his victims to "see" the Queen mother, and the senior footman to the Queen Mother have been successfully convicted this child abuse.

    However it is extremely difficult to find any criticism of the Queen in the MainStream-Media despite these crimes. It seems that any criticism is completely censored, only allowed to be aimed towards her ministers.

    In the last years 2 dead bodies were discovered on the Queen's estate. A young girl and a man. One of them had been known to be investigating the Royals for a long time, his corpse was found hidden inside a tree by a tree surgeon. No cause of death could be ascertained. Both were regarded as suspicious, but the Police didn't even question the royals as to why 2 dead bodies mysteriously turned up on their doorstep. The story has disappeared from the news since.

    The UK is not a democracy, it is a monarchy. This Queen is a crusty old control freak who spends millions in living costs from wealth she stole from our oppressed ancestors and colonies. She is one of the richest women in the world, yet spends millions a year of our tax money, yet has the nerve to talk about poverty as if she cares about it or something. They've never eaten a meal which wasn't cooked like it was for a 5 star restaurant. Dining with other mass-murderers such as King Hamad al-Khalifa of Bahrain and King Mswati III of Swaziland. She has no capacity for normal human emotion and is married to a racist whose secret fantasy it is to unleash a biological weapon to cull the human population.

    Diana hated the royals and called them "lizards" and for good reason. When the Queen got what she wanted when Diana was killed, and the nation was in mourning, she told them to shut up and keep it to themselves. She has no comprehension of normal human emotion and really couldn't see what the big fuss was and just wanted to lounge around at her holiday home. The only time she's ever "cried" was because her private yacht was getting decommissioned. Though I suspect they were crocodile tears.

    The Queen and Prince Philip abducted ten aboriginal children from a catholic school in Canada in 1964. None were ever seen or heard from again.
    Tens of thousands of children died or were murdered in Indian Resedential Schools in Canada run by the British Crown until 1996. Letters of Demand have been sent by lawyers requesting the Queen publicly disclose the cause of death and whereabouts of their buried remains, of all children who died in Indian Residential Schools operated by her.

    If you think she's just a pleasant little old lady, you're deluded. Her family has a long history of blood on their hands. What makes anyone think they are suddenly reformed? They continue to tolerate nepotism, corruption and abuse of privilege. The Royal Family is exempt from Freedom of Information requests and details of how much they truly take from the public purse kept secret.

    Constitutionally, the real power is with the Queen. People delude themselves thinking that she serves a purely ceremonial role, when euphemistically they claim she "only takes advice" from the PM. That explains how in 1976 she sacked the Australian PM because he wouldn't go to war in Vietnam. The Windsors just keep on take take taking from the taxpayer and give very little back. Despite doing little and achieving even less, they demand respect and deference from everyone. Every MP has to swear loyalty to the Queen, so none will speak up against her. They are forced to rely on the royals to use their royal perogative which they would be powerless without. However this can be revoked any time the royals wish.

    The Queen thinks that having certain blood justifies them stealing millions from the British people to fund their luxurious lifestyle when they have never done a day's work in their lives. It's sickening.

    Now we are spending millions on forcing Britain to celebrate the Queen's 6th decade of reigning over us, seriously jeopardising the recovery of our economy. Like Roman emperor Caligula, the Queen wants to be paraded down the Thames on an elaborate Royal barge surrounded by her minions showering her in adoration. People think they're being patriotic and British by bowing down to the Royals... they're not even remotely British.
    • 14 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Psyk)
    So if one of the Queen's gardeners molested someone, the Queen would be accused of sexual assault?
    She would be complicit and an accomplice if she knew it was going on at her property and she did nothing about it and covered it up. Like she has been doing.
    • 30 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Martyn*)
    If it happened on her premises, and she knew that the gardener had a history of sexual criminality, then yes.
    So you don't believe in redeeming criminals?

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 18, 2012
New on TSR

Halloween 2014

Join the TSR Halloween party...if you dare!

Article updates
Useful resources
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.