Did anyone do the AQA Philosophy Unit 2 paper in Jan 2012?
Philosophy, ethics, religious studies and theology discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Re: Did anyone do the AQA Philosophy Unit 2 paper in Jan 2012?
http://w1.qehs.net/moodle/file.php/4...2-QP-Jan12.pdf
that is the test paper
-
Re: Did anyone do the AQA Philosophy Unit 2 paper in Jan 2012?(Original post by b41nzy)
http://w1.qehs.net/moodle/file.php/4...2-QP-Jan12.pdf
that is the test paper
Thank you so much!
-
Re: Did anyone do the AQA Philosophy Unit 2 paper in Jan 2012?(Original post by b41nzy)
no problem, im doing god and the world and knowledge of the external world. what question do you think will come up for god and the world?
I think for part b maybe the design argument or the religious hypothesis because they did the problem of evil already this year. Or they might be mean and ask another problem of evil question just to catch everyone out! Sorry that probably isn't very helpful :P I guess my bet is on the design argument coming up in the part b (they don't seem to like asking about the religious hypothesis for some reason).
Good luck for Wednesday!
-
Re: Did anyone do the AQA Philosophy Unit 2 paper in Jan 2012?Religious hypothesis has only come up once as a part A i think. so yeah you're right, it should be teleological for part B. good luck to you aswell(Original post by anniebella)
I think for part b maybe the design argument or the religious hypothesis because they did the problem of evil already this year. Or they might be mean and ask another problem of evil question just to catch everyone out! Sorry that probably isn't very helpful :P I guess my bet is on the design argument coming up in the part b (they don't seem to like asking about the religious hypothesis for some reason).
Good luck for Wednesday!
-
Re: Did anyone do the AQA Philosophy Unit 2 paper in Jan 2012?
For Knowledge of the External world, I would count on the 15 marker being something to do with the distinction between primary and secondary qualities, alternatively it could be two objections to one of the three approaches, ie criticisms of direct realism, criticisms of representative realism etc