Transport Petition

TSR's model parliament.

Announcements Posted on
Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera 21-05-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. stanlas's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 641
    Transport Petition
    This petition calls upon the government to:
    1) Re-examine its commitment to the 'High Speed 2' railway project, following claims that the benefits have been overstated

    2) Provide an extra £200 million over the next ten years for the creation of the 'Strategic Freight Network' project

    3) Provide £560 million for the Manchester Hub project

    4) Provide £500 million for the electrification of the East Midlands line




    Why re-examine High Speed 2?
    Although the RL government has claimed that the £33 billion project could bring benefits of up to £47 billion, this has come under fierce criticism. It is clear that more reaserch is needed before embarking on such an expensive project, in case it turns out to be a white elephant.
    (Note: As mentioned in the discussion, clause 1) is essentially redundant as the current TSR government has no immediate plans to begin HS2)

    What is the Strategic Freight Network?
    It is quite simply a plan to increase the efficiency of freight transport in the UK: see here. Some £200 million has already been allocated at the time of writting, but it is thought that more money will be needed to make it effective

    Manchester Hub
    According to this and this, the £560 million project could bring 30,000 jobs in the North, economic benefits of £4.2 billion and increase capacity by 3.5 million per year. It is also important to note that transport spending in the North is currently significantly lower than around London

    East Midlands line
    See here for more detail on this project. According to reasarch, the comparative fuel cost per mile is 47p for diesel compared with 26p for electric, while track wear and tear per mile is 9.8p for diesel and 8.5p for electric.
    Last edited by stanlas; 16-05-2012 at 16:41.
  2. Morgsie's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: Stoke-On-Trent
    • Posts: 9,026
    Re: Transport Petition
    The Liberal Democrats are looking into the projects separately.

    The Manchester Hub is under threat due to the Electrification in the area

    There was a debate IRL last month regarding the MML Electrification.
    Last edited by Morgsie; 15-05-2012 at 20:50.
  3. stanlas's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 641
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by Morgsie)
    The Liberal Democrats are looking into the projects separately.
    Glad to hear it. Is that RL Lib Dems or TSR?

    (Original post by Morgsie)
    There was a debate IRL last month regarding the MML Electrification.
    I know, most of the statistics seem to support the case for it though. Electrified lines have clear benefits over diesel ones.

    Edit: missed out the Manchester Hub point. Only 5 days ago, Network rail called for more funding; the project is still viable and under way.
    Last edited by stanlas; 15-05-2012 at 20:54.
  4. Morgsie's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: Stoke-On-Trent
    • Posts: 9,026
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by stanlas)
    Glad to hear it. Is that RL Lib Dems or TSR?


    I know, most of the statistics seem to support the case for it though. Electrified lines have clear benefits over diesel ones.
    TSR of course

    There is a case regarding the MML. It needs to be included in the Network Rail Plans like the HLOS
  5. toronto353's Avatar
    • Community Assistant
    • PS Helper
    • Wiki Support Team
    • TSR Legend
    • Posts: 13,119
    Re: Transport Petition
    Just quoting our transport secretary.

    (Original post by internetguru)
    QFA
  6. stanlas's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 641
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by toronto353)
    Just quoting our transport secretary.
    Thanks, though from his other comments on TSR I somehow can't imagine him being too happy about this
  7. toronto353's Avatar
    • Community Assistant
    • PS Helper
    • Wiki Support Team
    • TSR Legend
    • Posts: 13,119
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by stanlas)
    Thanks, though from huis other comments I somehow can't imagine him being too happy about this
    There are certain aspects of this that I like so I will follow this with interest.
  8. internetguru's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 3,453
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: Transport Petition
    As transport secretary I oppose any money going towards the most inefficient form of transportation known as trains.
  9. RoryS's Avatar
    • Community Assistant
    • Deputy Secretary General of the Model UN
    • Location: South London
    • Posts: 2,601
    Re: Transport Petition
    As Shadow Transport Secretary, I strongly disagree with building a High Speed Railway right through the middle of our glorious countryside. The construction of the High Speed Railway will force people out of their homes, destroy parts of the countryside and generally not be an effective solution for this problem.
  10. stanlas's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 641
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by internetguru)
    As transport secretary I oppose any money going towards the most inefficient form of transportation known as trains.
    Inefficient? How is it less efficient than cars? Or buses? Any statistics on the 'inefficiency' of trains compared to other services? (or do you have some personal bad experience with trains?).
  11. DebatingGreg's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 1,028
    Re: Transport Petition
    A lot of this seems sensible enough. Shall follow with interest...
  12. internetguru's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 3,453
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by stanlas)
    Inefficient? How is it less efficient than cars? Or buses? Any statistics on the 'inefficiency' of trains compared to other services? (or do you have some personal bad experience with trains?).
    Trains are used by the minority I oppose spending so much money on such a niche market.
  13. DebatingGreg's Avatar
    • Exalted and Worshipped Member
    • Posts: 1,028
    Re: Transport Petition
  14. stanlas's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 641
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by internetguru)
    Trains are used by the minority I oppose spending so much money on such a niche market.
    Almost a third of journeys are made in trains. They also account for over 10% of freight transport in the UK. They are one of the main forms of transport.

    Also, any luck with finding the 'trains are inefficient' statistics?
  15. Mechie's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 6,531
    Re: Transport Petition
    What about the possibility of HS2 to Scotland?
  16. Morgsie's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: Stoke-On-Trent
    • Posts: 9,026
    Re: Transport Petition
    The TSR Liberal Democrats strongly support HS2 but the demand for more research will delay this vital piece of infrastructure. HS2 has got to go ahead because the WCML will be chock of block soon. Network Rail (the Infrastructure Company) is saying it.

    I looked into this issue last term as part of my tenure as Transport Secretary. There was a call by the current Leader of the Opposition who was the former Secretary of State for Scotland for HS2 to go to Glasgow and Edinburgh which I started looking into.

    We (the Lib Dems) disagree with the Transport Secretary's comments and we feel he is out of touch and out of depth
    Last edited by Morgsie; 15-05-2012 at 22:26.
  17. stanlas's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 641
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by davidmarsh01)
    What about the possibility of HS2 to Scotland?
    That was considered some time ago, but I think it has been dropped by now (the £32 billion will be the cost of the network up to Leeds and Manchester).

    I'd just like to make it clear to everyone that I am not actually taking a position on HS2; I just think that it is such a major investment that we need more concrete facts on the costs and benefits before spending any money on it.
  18. Morgsie's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: Stoke-On-Trent
    • Posts: 9,026
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by davidmarsh01)
    What about the possibility of HS2 to Scotland?
    Extend the Manchester branch to Glasgow and extend the Leeds branch to Edinburgh via Newcastle?
  19. internetguru's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 3,453
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by stanlas)
    Almost a third of journeys are made in trains. They also account for over 10% of freight transport in the UK. They are one of the main forms of transport.

    Also, any luck with finding the 'trains are inefficient' statistics?
    A third of journeys in the UK are made by trains huh no idiot would believe that lie.
  20. Morgsie's Avatar
    • TSR Idol
    • Location: Stoke-On-Trent
    • Posts: 9,026
    Re: Transport Petition
    (Original post by internetguru)
    Trains are used by the minority I oppose spending so much money on such a niche market.
    This is utter crap, your own party produced stats last term which showed that numbers have increased since Privatization as part of its Rail Bill.

    As for money, Government gets money through Franchise Premium Payments
    Last edited by Morgsie; 15-05-2012 at 22:35.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.