Hey there Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Transport Petition

Announcements Posted on
We're up for a Webby! Vote TSR to help us win. 10-04-2014
    • Thread Starter
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    This petition calls upon the government to:
    1) Re-examine its commitment to the 'High Speed 2' railway project, following claims that the benefits have been overstated

    2) Provide an extra £200 million over the next ten years for the creation of the 'Strategic Freight Network' project

    3) Provide £560 million for the Manchester Hub project

    4) Provide £500 million for the electrification of the East Midlands line




    Why re-examine High Speed 2?
    Although the RL government has claimed that the £33 billion project could bring benefits of up to £47 billion, this has come under fierce criticism. It is clear that more reaserch is needed before embarking on such an expensive project, in case it turns out to be a white elephant.
    (Note: As mentioned in the discussion, clause 1) is essentially redundant as the current TSR government has no immediate plans to begin HS2)

    What is the Strategic Freight Network?
    It is quite simply a plan to increase the efficiency of freight transport in the UK: see here. Some £200 million has already been allocated at the time of writting, but it is thought that more money will be needed to make it effective

    Manchester Hub
    According to this and this, the £560 million project could bring 30,000 jobs in the North, economic benefits of £4.2 billion and increase capacity by 3.5 million per year. It is also important to note that transport spending in the North is currently significantly lower than around London

    East Midlands line
    See here for more detail on this project. According to reasarch, the comparative fuel cost per mile is 47p for diesel compared with 26p for electric, while track wear and tear per mile is 9.8p for diesel and 8.5p for electric.
    • 32 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    The Liberal Democrats are looking into the projects separately.

    The Manchester Hub is under threat due to the Electrification in the area

    There was a debate IRL last month regarding the MML Electrification.
    • Thread Starter
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Morgsie)
    The Liberal Democrats are looking into the projects separately.
    Glad to hear it. Is that RL Lib Dems or TSR?

    (Original post by Morgsie)
    There was a debate IRL last month regarding the MML Electrification.
    I know, most of the statistics seem to support the case for it though. Electrified lines have clear benefits over diesel ones.

    Edit: missed out the Manchester Hub point. Only 5 days ago, Network rail called for more funding; the project is still viable and under way.
    • 32 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stanlas)
    Glad to hear it. Is that RL Lib Dems or TSR?


    I know, most of the statistics seem to support the case for it though. Electrified lines have clear benefits over diesel ones.
    TSR of course

    There is a case regarding the MML. It needs to be included in the Network Rail Plans like the HLOS
    • 44 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Just quoting our transport secretary.

    (Original post by internetguru)
    QFA
    • Thread Starter
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by toronto353)
    Just quoting our transport secretary.
    Thanks, though from his other comments on TSR I somehow can't imagine him being too happy about this
    • 44 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stanlas)
    Thanks, though from huis other comments I somehow can't imagine him being too happy about this
    There are certain aspects of this that I like so I will follow this with interest.
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    As transport secretary I oppose any money going towards the most inefficient form of transportation known as trains.
    • 23 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    As Shadow Transport Secretary, I strongly disagree with building a High Speed Railway right through the middle of our glorious countryside. The construction of the High Speed Railway will force people out of their homes, destroy parts of the countryside and generally not be an effective solution for this problem.
    • Thread Starter
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by internetguru)
    As transport secretary I oppose any money going towards the most inefficient form of transportation known as trains.
    Inefficient? How is it less efficient than cars? Or buses? Any statistics on the 'inefficiency' of trains compared to other services? (or do you have some personal bad experience with trains?).
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    A lot of this seems sensible enough. Shall follow with interest...
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stanlas)
    Inefficient? How is it less efficient than cars? Or buses? Any statistics on the 'inefficiency' of trains compared to other services? (or do you have some personal bad experience with trains?).
    Trains are used by the minority I oppose spending so much money on such a niche market.
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    For reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_tr..._Great_Britain
    • Thread Starter
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by internetguru)
    Trains are used by the minority I oppose spending so much money on such a niche market.
    Almost a third of journeys are made in trains. They also account for over 10% of freight transport in the UK. They are one of the main forms of transport.

    Also, any luck with finding the 'trains are inefficient' statistics?
    • 10 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    What about the possibility of HS2 to Scotland?
    • 32 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    The TSR Liberal Democrats strongly support HS2 but the demand for more research will delay this vital piece of infrastructure. HS2 has got to go ahead because the WCML will be chock of block soon. Network Rail (the Infrastructure Company) is saying it.

    I looked into this issue last term as part of my tenure as Transport Secretary. There was a call by the current Leader of the Opposition who was the former Secretary of State for Scotland for HS2 to go to Glasgow and Edinburgh which I started looking into.

    We (the Lib Dems) disagree with the Transport Secretary's comments and we feel he is out of touch and out of depth
    • Thread Starter
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by davidmarsh01)
    What about the possibility of HS2 to Scotland?
    That was considered some time ago, but I think it has been dropped by now (the £32 billion will be the cost of the network up to Leeds and Manchester).

    I'd just like to make it clear to everyone that I am not actually taking a position on HS2; I just think that it is such a major investment that we need more concrete facts on the costs and benefits before spending any money on it.
    • 32 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by davidmarsh01)
    What about the possibility of HS2 to Scotland?
    Extend the Manchester branch to Glasgow and extend the Leeds branch to Edinburgh via Newcastle?
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stanlas)
    Almost a third of journeys are made in trains. They also account for over 10% of freight transport in the UK. They are one of the main forms of transport.

    Also, any luck with finding the 'trains are inefficient' statistics?
    A third of journeys in the UK are made by trains huh no idiot would believe that lie.
    • 32 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by internetguru)
    Trains are used by the minority I oppose spending so much money on such a niche market.
    This is utter crap, your own party produced stats last term which showed that numbers have increased since Privatization as part of its Rail Bill.

    As for money, Government gets money through Franchise Premium Payments

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?

    this is what you'll be called on TSR

  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?

    never shared and never spammed

  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By completing the slider below you agree to The Student Room's terms & conditions and site rules

  2. Slide the button to the right to create your account

    Slide to join now Processing…

    You don't slide that way? No problem.

Updated: May 22, 2012
Article updates
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.