If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked??

Football discussion forum.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. Sharpshooter's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,893
    If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked??
    I was looking at Alex Ferguson's record as United manager when he first came in back in 1986 after leaving Aberdeen, and these were his records:

    1986-87 - 11th and trophyless
    1987-88 - 2nd and trophyless
    1988-89 - 11th and trophyless
    1989-90 - 13th and Fa Cup (finished only 5 points above the relegation zone)

    His Signings were:

    1987
    Viv Anderson - Arsenal - 250,000
    Brian McClair - Celtic - 850,000
    Steve Bruce - Norwich - 825,000

    1988
    Jim Leighton - Aberdeen - 750,000
    Lee Sharpe - Torquay - 180,000
    Mal Donaghy - Luton Town - 650,000
    Ralph Mine - Bristol City - 170,000
    Mark Hughes - Barcelona - 1,800,000
    Giuliano Mairoana - Histon - 30,000

    1989
    Mike Phelan - Norwich - 750,000
    Gary Pallister - Middlesbrough - 2,300,000
    Neill Web - Nott. Forest - 1,500,000
    Brian Carey - Corke - 100,000
    Danny Wallace - Southampton - 1,200,000
    Paul Ince - West Ham - 1,500,000


    Erm....surely if managed in todays climate with those results he would have been sacked?? Not a hope of him surviving IMO with todays owners abramovich et al.

    Gary Pallister was a record transfer fee for a defender and the highest between two British clubs at the time so also spent a whack of money in the equivalent of those days.

    He spent over 7 million in 1989 alone which was a ton of money then, and only come 5 points of the relegation zone, surely trophy or no trophy after 4 years he would be a goner today??
  2. Jordan_1's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 1,770
    • Warning points: 1010
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    With those results, going from 2nd to 11th the next season he would have been sacked no questions asked.

    However if he somehow managed to cock things up right now I don't think he would get sacked. He would probably realise it was time to retire and leave on his own accord anyway.
  3. Ano1's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Posts: 828
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    The answer is yes, obviously.

    But luckily for United fans that didn't happen. The rest is history.
    Not much left to say or debate about tbh.
  4. Sharpshooter's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,893
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    (Original post by Ano1)
    Not much left to say or debate about tbh.
    Does Ferguson highlight that maybe managers get sacked too early?
  5. wenger16's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 577
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    (Original post by Sharpshooter)
    Does Ferguson highlight that maybe managers get sacked too early?
    No, with todays impatient billionaires the climate is different. Its perform or piss off.
  6. Fusion's Avatar
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: Bruges (It's in Belgium)
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    100% yes.

    If David Moyes took over this summer and failed to make cl within 2 years then he'd be gone for sure, even after one season of no cl I'd expect to see him off. The money stakes are too huge nowadays to give a manager at a top club, especially the world's wealthiest club, as much time as SAF had back then. There's too much at stake for the owners.
  7. Jim-Jam's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,849
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    No in the sense that United had no precedent set at that time, but going from 2nd to 11th, yes, he would have been.
  8. Christien's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    If it wasn't for that FA cup he would have been sacked in that era.


    Funny how things work out
  9. That Bearded Man's Avatar
    • Overlord in Training
    • Location: A glass case of emotion
    • Posts: 2,380
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    Yes, he would have been sacked. Valid point about the need to give managers more time, then again there is a certain urgency about football these days.

    Glad he didn't
  10. stephen88's Avatar
    • Junior Member
    • Posts: 59
    Re: If Alex Ferguson Repeated His 86-90 Tenure In This Era, Would He Have Been Sacked
    Well Fergie didn't start the season with United in 86, he took over from Ron Atkinson 3 months into the season. They hadn't won the league in 20 years before he took over (winning league 2 when they got relegated to come back into the first division doesn't really count).

    Manchester United was a very different team back then, and their runner up position in 87-88 was their best league finish for 8 years. The subsequent season wasn't great but his managerial record was top drawer and it takes time to reshape a team.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Useful resources

Articles:

Click for live football commentary

Quick Link:

Unanswered Football Threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.