Would you like Private schools to be banned? (POLL)

Private healthcare isn't a good analogy- would you want the US system unfettered and the misery it has caused for example, the complete lack of human rights for the poor?

Another point is that Britain has had both state and private healthcare, but until very recently due to Tory ideology, the NHS has been vastly more respected and trusted by people of all classes and incomes.

.

I can however see where these people are coming from state schools lose a lot of good teachers because by going to the private sector they get better pay and more freedom in terms of what they teach and how they teach it but then maybe the public sector should look at why that is happening.

This. Rather than blaming the private sector for being more attractive, the public sector needs to become more efficient and better run.

The public sector is inefficient, government is inefficient.(on the whole)

Singapore has state and the private sector involved heatlchare, this is a model we should aspire to. According to the world health organisation Singapore healthcare system is far superior to the NHS. The NHS is inefficient and is not our best achievement(sorry this breaks your dreams and common leftist thoughts)
https://producaoindustrialblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/15/world-health-organizations-ranking-of-the-worlds-health-systems/

Where did I say the NHS was perfect, stop attributing arguments to me I didn't make. I said it has been, until recent stress, but even still now, way better and more trusted than private, within this country. It has also been, besides France and maybe some in Scandinavia, the best in the world, again it has weakened due to lack of support and the ideology of Tories.

.

Love the way you ignore my entire post by the way, the thread is about schools not healthcare you utter fool.

You glib adolescent free market idealists think you're so cool and have read Ayn Rand a little too much, you are literally blind to the complexities and downsides and it wouldn't surprise me if you wanted to emulate Singapore in all ways, yet the place is a toilet.

Seems you didn't address my point.



You made claims about healthcare which were false.

You marxists think you're so cool and you have read too much Marx, you are are blind to the real world.
Funny how you don't address any points and just use ad hominens.

Well, address the many irrefutably logical points in mine before picking out the one part that wasn't about the thread subject?

Oh, and you were the one to first use ad hominems too.

Are you deliberately trying to be as transparently hypocritical as possible?

Another daft tactic of those who idealise a certain kind of politics, and no by the way, I'm not someone who sees no positives in it, is to put words in the mouth of their opponents and create broad brush strawmen arguments, such as, for example, trying to attribute 'communism' to people who don't want foodbanks or an indefinite rise in inequality. That's where I come to the whole sixth form, childish element going on with some people on this side of the political spectrum.

The libertarians who only support economic exploitation, but think that issues like the continual assault on civil liberties in the name of anti-terror legislation are good, are usually the most ignorant, myopic and regressive.

In this sense Thatcher was no Libertarian, Ron Paul is more like it.

I called you out for BS on healthcare, I don't care about this thread and what you said about schools some it made sense IIRC.
I was illustrating how stupid your point was about rand so I said marx. You are the hypocrite.

You don't what you are talking about and I am not a conservative supporter.
I will leave this discussion as it is not achieving anything

The left wont stop unless everyone is united in below averaginess, "WE NEED MOAR EQUALUTEH", yeah, Ok, so what that means is not to improve education, but to take the top 20% and make them as equally mediocre and the bottom 40%