[b3n1]

Hell comes to mind?

[matthew769]

(Original post by b3n1)
Hell comes to mind?

Agreed lol, disaster of a paper.

[lopikase123]

haha there were some nasty bits, and like that nitrogen cycle stuff??? eh wrong paper?? the essay was ok though i thought what about you guys?

[michaelf12]

absolute nightmare

[matthew769]

(Original post by lopikase123)
haha there were some nasty bits, and like that nitrogen cycle stuff??? eh wrong paper?? the essay was ok though i thought what about you guys?

yeo lopikase haha yeah few questions v dodgy. second part of essay was vague though, a number of things could have been said

[lopikase123]

do you think the marks will be scaled up much?

[jamster1991]

the only saving grace of that paper was the essay. Are they allowed to put things that blatantly arent on the spec onto the paper? There are gonna have to scale that up something shocking if everyone found it as hard i did.

[michaelf12]

what did everyone get for the probability the child was an albino haemophillic male?

[lopikase123]

(Original post by jamster1991)
the only saving grace of that paper was the essay. Are they allowed to put things that blatantly arent on the spec onto the paper? There are gonna have to scale that up something shocking if everyone found it as hard i did.

why what wasnt on the spec?? there was no 'peer review' type stuff like that which came up on paper one. The whole plasmi/vector thing was stariaght from the book it was nice, they even used the exact diagram in the transcription questiion lol

[sdillon590]

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...type=1&theater

Tell me this, second part of the essay, general differences, or differences in ATP production?!

[michaelf12]

(Original post by jamster1991)
the only saving grace of that paper was the essay. Are they allowed to put things that blatantly arent on the spec onto the paper? There are gonna have to scale that up something shocking if everyone found it as hard i did.

I think thats what they mean by "synoptic" but I feel your pain, the nitrogen cycle had completely left my head too

[jamster1991]

(Original post by lopikase123)
why what wasnt on the spec?? there was no 'peer review' type stuff like that which came up on paper one. The whole plasmi/vector thing was stariaght from the book it was nice, they even used the exact diagram in the transcription questiion lol

Nitrogen cycle is not on the spec for the second paper

[matthew769]

(Original post by michaelf12)
what did everyone get for the probability the child was an albino haemophillic male?

1/16. you?

[lopikase123]

yea 1/16

[michaelf12]

(Original post by matthew769)
1/16. you?

Yass i got the same, it was like X^hY aa

[iamjellywhatami]

It was horrendous i wanted to cry!
I left out the most important bit in the 5mk punnet square question...the ratio ..fml. dont even get me started on the essay.

[cz100]

Even the essay felt a bit weird, like ATP synthesis isn't really the main function of photosynthesis.

[lopikase123]

can i ask how you proved that it was sex linked?? is it simply that all affected were male ? its just that that doesnt really seemed like proof more than just a high liklihood

[matthew769]

(Original post by lopikase123)
can i ask how you proved that it was sex linked?? is it simply that all affected were male ? its just that that doesnt really seemed like proof more than just a high liklihood

i just went for more common in males than females

[michaelf12]

(Original post by lopikase123)
can i ask how you proved that it was sex linked?? is it simply that all affected were male ? its just that that doesnt really seemed like proof more than just a high liklihood

yeah i couldnt prove it exactly, I just said that all males had it, and since they only need to have the non functional gene once (one X chromosome) then they are more likely. I dont know how you can prove it exactly