Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey there Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

AQA AS-LEVEL chemistry unit 2, 23/05/2012, raw mark POLL AND MARKSCHEME

Announcements Posted on
  • View Poll Results: What raw mark do you think you obtained ?
    95 to 100 out of 100
    7.91%
    90 to 95 out of 100
    11.51%
    85 to 90 out of 100
    15.11%
    80 to 85 out of 100
    21.58%
    75 to 80 out of 100
    15.11%
    70 to 75 out of 100
    13.67%
    65 to 70 out of 100
    5.04%
    60 to 65 out of 100
    4.32%
    below 60
    5.76%

    • 6 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by iAre Teh Lejend)
    Yeahh, -49 and -399, and yes they did.
    Wohoooooooooo :banana2:... but the rest arghhhhhh :eyeball::getmecoat:
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I though it was Increase, but then though that it would shift to the left.. DAMN!!

    I got -49 and then some random figure like 0.00393kg But I guessed for that one.
    • Thread Starter
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by CheekiiMonkii)
    Wohoooooooooo :banana2:... but the rest arghhhhhh :eyeball::getmecoat:
    :/
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    What was the original figure that needed dividing by the moles?
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I'm doing chemistry 2 tomorrow... Will it be the same exam?!
    • Thread Starter
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PineappleChristmas)
    I though it was Increase, but then though that it would shift to the left.. DAMN!!

    I got -49 and then some random figure like 0.00393kg But I guessed for that one.
    It was increase though ? :confused:
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by iAre Teh Lejend)
    It was increase though ? :confused:
    Yeah it was increase, i just made a silly mistake.
    • Thread Starter
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PineappleChristmas)
    Yeah it was increase, i just made a silly mistake.
    Ahhh unlucky mate
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by iAre Teh Lejend)
    Yeahh, -49 and -399, and yes they did.
    got same asnwers as you for all questions you mentioned. What was the questions and numbers for calculation with -49? I can't remember lol, I think I remember number -399 but can't recall what I got for another one. Well I am good with calculations and was confident so it should be right unless I wrote down a wrong value or entered into calculator, but I was careful so xD And only the last one, graph where the gradient was steeper reached same position as original, the first one stayed at the top and second below. First one was double the height of original, second was 40% of original one, so it was with the first line or so I think, can't remember, but I remember original curve had 100 volume and 1.0 concentration, while second had 100 volume and 0.4 concentration, so it was less than half.

    yeah for -399 it was 140*4.18*7.5 then divide by 1000 then divide by 0.011 and then stick minus in front because it was exothermic and therefore answer is -399

    But don't remember for the enthalpy the values.
    • 6 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by iAre Teh Lejend)
    :/
    I noe right.... >.< ..... I didn't think I would do bad in chem......
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    guys what did you put for the ionic questions. and did you find it as hard as i did i thought the questions were tough but i felt i got a few of them right. also for the question about saftery when making butan1,4 diol ? i was dissapointed there werent more marks for mechanisms.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Miyata)
    got same asnwers as you for all questions you mentioned. What was the questions and numbers for calculation with -49? I can't remember lol, I think I remember number -399 but can't recall what I got for another one. Well I am good with calculations and was confident so it should be right unless I wrote down a wrong value or entered into calculator, but I was careful so xD And only the last one, graph where the gradient was steeper reached same position as original, the first one stayed at the top and second below. First one was double the height of original, second was 40% of original one, so it was with the first line or so I think, can't remember, but I remember original curve had 100 volume and 1.0 concentration, while second had 100 volume and 0.4 concentration, so it was less than half.

    yeah for -399 it was 140*4.18*7.5 then divide by 1000 then divide by 0.011 and then stick minus in front because it was exothermic and therefore answer is -399

    But don't remember for the enthalpy the values.
    The question asked the enthalpy change of the methanol when 1 MOLE of it was combusted so after you got the -399 as the value, you then had to calculate it to get the enthalpy change when 1 mole was burnt so it was just ratio so the answer would have been much more exothermic...I swear?

    I'm 100% sure that the question said in the second paragraph that what the enthalpy change was when 1 mole of methanol was combusted :P
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    yh i think it was -399 because it was i got tht and already divided it by 0.1 i think??
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    i was gutted felt i was gunna get an A as long as there wasnt much on ionic equations and learn behold ..
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kimmar)
    The question asked the enthalpy change of the methanol when 1 MOLE of it was combusted so after you got the -399 as the value, you then had to calculate it to get the enthalpy change when 1 mole was burnt so it was just ratio so the answer would have been much more exothermic...I swear?

    I'm 100% sure that the question said in the second paragraph that what the enthalpy change was when 1 mole of methanol was combusted :P
    No, you had q = 4389J or 4.389 kJ, and that is 0.011 mole. To get 1 one you divided 4.389 by 0.011 and you got 399, then coz its exothermic you stick a minus. But you can stick it before that as well, -4.389/0.011.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by iAre Teh Lejend)
    -399kJmol^-1
    ****! I forgot to put minus :eek:
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Miyata)
    No, you had q = 4389J or 4.389 kJ, and that is 0.011 mole. To get 1 one you divided 4.389 by 0.011 and you got 399, then coz its exothermic you stick a minus. But you can stick it before that as well, -4.389/0.011.
    oh yeah true, i got -399 anyways so good
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    oi what about the ionic equations is any gunna put on an unofficial mark scheme on ??
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    what did you get for the le chantlieirs questions??
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by iAre Teh Lejend)
    How did everyone find it, please vote on the poll
    easiest paper ever......defo 140

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 25, 2012
New on TSR

Find out what year 11 is like

Going into year 11? Students who did it last year share what to expect.

Article updates
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.