M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies

Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. Jetblast's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 437
    M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    Heres the question, all it asks for is to find the sum of the moments about P

    http://imgur.com/GPHsS

    Only thing I'm really struggling on is for the anti-clock moment, why is it 3cos55? why is it not 3sin55??

    Any tips on these sorts of questions? haven't managed to find much on the web

    EDIT: Also in this one, why is it 3 x4cos55?? I see no 3N force going clockwise??

    http://imgur.com/8aa1v
    Last edited by Jetblast; 23-05-2012 at 21:07.
  2. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by Jetblast)
    Heres the question, all it asks for is to find the sum of the moments about P

    http://imgur.com/GPHsS

    Only thing I'm really struggling on is for the anti-clock moment, why is it 3cos55? why is it not 3sin55??
    You need the perpendicular distance of the line of the action of the force. The line in red on the left, which is the same length as the line in red on the right.
    Attached Thumbnails
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	untitled.png 
Views:	45 
Size:	38.8 KB 
ID:	150793  
  3. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by Jetblast)

    EDIT: Also in this one, why is it 3 x4cos55?? I see no 3N force going clockwise??

    http://imgur.com/8aa1v
    They've got their clockwise and anticlockwise mixed up.

    First line is for anticlockwise forces,

    Second line is for clockwise force.
  4. Jetblast's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 437
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    You need the perpendicular distance of the line of the action of the force. The line in red on the left, which is the same length as the line in red on the right.
    Thanks for the reply, but I still don't understand. Yes, the lines are the same length, but how does that help? I'm confused as its virtually the opposite as to how I've learnt to solve forces (cosx on the side which has the angle and sinx on the other side with F in the middle at angle x)
  5. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by Jetblast)
    Thanks for the reply, but I still don't understand. Yes, the lines are the same length, but how does that help? I'm confused as its virtually the opposite as to how I've learnt to solve forces (cosx on the side which has the angle and sinx on the other side with F in the middle at angle x)
    What technique have you been taught for finding moments?

    You can either find the perpendicular distance of the line of action of the force (which is what the solid line in red is, in the diagram).

    Or, resolve the force into components radial and tangential to the line connecting the point of action of the force to the pivot.

    I would be surprised if it's the latter, as it's somewhat messier to deal with, IMHO.

    And with the former, there is no requirement to resolve the force into components.
  6. Jetblast's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 437
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    What technique have you been taught for finding moments?

    You can either find the perpendicular distance of the line of action of the force (which is what the solid line in red is, in the diagram).

    Or, resolve the force into components radial and tangential to the line connecting the point of action of the force to the pivot.

    I would be surprised if it's the latter, as it's somewhat messier to deal with, IMHO.

    And with the former, there is no requirement to resolve the force into components.
    Perpendicular distance and force.
  7. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by Jetblast)
    Perpendicular distance and force.
    Good.

    So, you're not resolving the force into components, hence the cos/sin you were talking about doesn't apply here.

    You're just interested in finding the perpendicular distance; either of the two solid lines in red, which are adjacent to the 55 degree angles, and hence the use of "4 cos 55".
  8. Jetblast's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 437
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    Good.

    So, you're not resolving the force into components, hence the cos/sin you were talking about doesn't apply here.

    You're just interested in finding the perpendicular distance; either of the two solid lines in red, which are adjacent to the 55 degree angles, and hence the use of "4 cos 55".
    No, no, I am resolving into components, clock and anti-clock.

    4 is the distance from P to where the 3N is applied. What is making me crazy is why its 3cos55 and not 3sin55
    I think, we need to find F in the diagram below. A=55
    The solution says 3cos55=F but I only see that it has to be 3sin55=F (I think)
    http://imgur.com/SdscQ
    I'm so confused
  9. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by Jetblast)
    No, no, I am resolving into components, clock and anti-clock.

    4 is the distance from P to where the 3N is applied. What is making me crazy is why its 3cos55 and not 3sin55
    I think, we need to find F in the diagram below. A=55
    The solution says 3cos55=F but I only see that it has to be 3sin55=F (I think)
    http://imgur.com/SdscQ
    I'm so confused
    OK, I think I can see your confusion.

    The force you are resolving is the 3N force and that is your F. Here's a revised diagram.
    Attached Thumbnails
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	untitled.png 
Views:	20 
Size:	39.0 KB 
ID:	150818  
  10. Jetblast's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 437
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    OK, I think I can see your confusion.

    The force you are resolving is the 3N force and that is your F. Here's a revised diagram.
    :eek: so A isn't 55?? *goes back to GCSE maths *

    How about this one, how would the anti-clock's be resolved?
    http://imgur.com/iSOVh

    Thanks for your help, I would have literally had nightmares if I didn't understand by the time I went to sleep! I have difficulties on simple maths while I am able to do complex maths
  11. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by Jetblast)
    :eek: so A isn't 55?? *goes back to GCSE maths *

    How about this one, how would the anti-clock's be resolved?
    http://imgur.com/iSOVh

    Thanks for your help, I would have literally had nightmares if I didn't understand by the time I went to sleep! I have difficulties on simple maths while I am able to do complex maths
    Come on. Have a go. Choose one of the forces, mark the line for the direction in which you need to resolve it, mark the angle you need to work out, and then start working out some angles. Work from what you know, adding a step at a time.
  12. Jetblast's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 437
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    Come on. Have a go. Choose one of the forces, mark the line for the direction in which you need to resolve it, mark the angle you need to work out, and then start working out some angles. Work from what you know, adding a step at a time.
    Ok, I tried it, but am a little off the answer

    Clockwise: 15sin50=11.5
    Anti: 6sin18+12sin72=13.27

    13.27-11.5=1.77 Anti-clock

    I'm thinking I'm right as they are 1 degree off with the angles for the anti-clock moments
  13. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by Jetblast)
    Ok, I tried it, but am a little off the answer

    Clockwise: 15sin50=11.5
    Anti: 6sin18+12sin72=13.27

    13.27-11.5=1.77 Anti-clock

    I'm thinking I'm right as they are 1 degree off with the angles for the anti-clock moments
    You want to quote to the same degree of accuracy for each part, so the first one should be 11.49. Aside from that, you're correct, and your angles are correct.


    It's not very impressive that 2 out of the 3 examples have errors in given solution. Where are these from?
  14. raheem94's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 5,512
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    You want to quote to the same degree of accuracy for each part, so the first one should be 11.49. Aside from that, you're correct, and your angles are correct.


    It's not very impressive that 2 out of the 3 examples have errors in given solution. Where are these from?
    These questions are from the edexcel M2 modular textbook.

    I remember spending hours trying to figure them out, it was the first exercise so i thought that i might be wrong but actually most of the answers were wrong, this exercise also has questions with wrong data(the lengths marked on the given shape are wrong).

    This thread contains another question from the same exercise of the book, using the sine/cosine rule it can be deduced that the marked length/angle are wrong.
  15. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by raheem94)
    ...
    Makes one wonder, if Edexcel sat one of their own exams, would they pass?
  16. raheem94's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Posts: 5,512
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    Makes one wonder, if Edexcel sat one of their own exams, would they pass?
    :nah:
  17. Jetblast's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 437
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    Makes one wonder, if Edexcel sat one of their own exams, would they pass?
    Probably not. It really puts a lot of pressure on us who waste time thinking about what is wrong when we're actually right.

    A number of other question solutions were wrong throughout the rest of the chapter. As oppose to the previous chapter, where I done a whole chapter in a day, I haven't even done half of this chapter yet

    Heres another question I'm confused about even though its an example. Care to explain please? I don't understand it from the taking of the moments

    http://imgur.com/AdIz9
    Last edited by Jetblast; 24-05-2012 at 22:00.
  18. ghostwalker's Avatar
    • Outcast of Imrryr
    • Location: CA13
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by Jetblast)
    Probably not. It really puts a lot of pressure on us who waste time thinking about what is wrong when we're actually right.

    A number of other question solutions were wrong throughout the rest of the chapter. As oppose to the previous chapter, where I done a whole chapter in a day, I haven't even done half of this chapter yet

    Heres another question I'm confused about even though its an example. Care to explain please? I don't understand it from the taking of the moments

    http://imgur.com/AdIz9
    Taking moments about A; in the first moments equation, the LHS is the sum of the clockwise moments (weight of ladder plus mass), and the RHS is the sum of the anticlockwise moments. If you were writing out all the steps it would be "P" on the RHS, but since F=P, we can put F.

    Does that cover it? If not, can you be more specific.
  19. Jetblast's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 437
    Re: M2/1 Statics of rigid bodies
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    Taking moments about A; in the first moments equation, the LHS is the sum of the clockwise moments (weight of ladder plus mass), and the RHS is the sum of the anticlockwise moments. If you were writing out all the steps it would be "P" on the RHS, but since F=P, we can put F.

    Does that cover it? If not, can you be more specific.
    Ah thanks. In my stupor last night i didn't realise moments were taken from B

    Thanks again
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.