[ila4e123]

(Original post by QTpie118)
I've made sooo many mistakes on this exam

Same hope the boundaries are low!

[SamHLFC]

(Original post by Spellstheend)
My reason was really bad, i said driving a car is a necessity for many young people to drive to work etc whereas extreme sports isnt

ohwell, hopefully ill get 1 mark

I put that some extreme sports are individual & won't affect other people whereas car driving relies on other people & could injure other people


This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad App

[vanilla-ice]

(Original post by SamHLFC)
I put that some extreme sports are individual & won't affect other people whereas car driving relies on other people & could injure other people


This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad App

I wrote that young people need a driving license to be legitimately allowed to drive whereas people participating in extreme sports don't need a license to do so

[stuck18]

i hope its like a 50 for an A .. in jan 2012 it was something like 51 or 52 for an A

[Varunaen]

(Original post by vanilla-ice)
I wrote that young people need a driving license to be legitimately allowed to drive whereas people participating in extreme sports don't need a license to do so

thIS IS WHAT I PUT TOO

[Koalagate]

(Original post by Spellstheend)
What did everyone get for the multiple choice?

For the chewing gum one, what was the argument element? and what was the intermediate conclusion

and for the tabloid, what was the conclusion and what was the other conclusion you could draw?

and the EU languages one, what was the argument element?
and the lip synch one, what was the argument element?

If anyone remembers that is

Chewing gum - I put reason, I think, though I wasn't sure. IC, can't remember the question.

Conclusion = Reporting the sex scandals is harmful. Other conclusion = I put the one that went like 'Tabloid papers should be careful about reporting footballer's sex scandals'.

My memory is fading fast. I can't remember the EU languages question - might have been main conclusion? - and for lip sync I think I put it was a counter-assertion.

For the analogy, I think I put that both extreme sports and driving are dangerous activities or something. It was a bit weak. Not sure how the argument writing went, it's always really difficult to tell how you did with Critical Thinking. :/

But hey, that was my last AS exam so I'm happy.

[stuck18]

(Original post by Koalagate)
Chewing gum - I put reason, I think, though I wasn't sure. IC, can't remember the question.

Conclusion = Reporting the sex scandals is harmful. Other conclusion = I put the one that went like 'Tabloid papers should be careful about reporting footballer's sex scandals'.

My memory is fading fast. I can't remember the EU languages question - might have been main conclusion? - and for lip sync I think I put it was a counter-assertion.

For the analogy, I think I put that both extreme sports and driving are dangerous activities or something. It was a bit weak. Not sure how the argument writing went, it's always really difficult to tell how you did with Critical Thinking. :/

But hey, that was my last AS exam so I'm happy.

i got the exact same ones as u mentioned for the multiple choice. phew ! :P hopefully were both right.

[mylonelyangel]

Yeah i think i got quite a few bs i cant really remember D;