This nonesense needs to stop.

Football discussion forum.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. Jordan_1's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 1,770
    • Warning points: 1010
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    he was 25 when he scored the 2 late, winning goals against brazil, which won france the world cup. yes he did win it for them, if it wasn't for those 2 goals france would have lost.

    then he came out of retirement as an old man. the guy was 34, and could have easily won the world cup for france all by himself.

    so why can he not perform without xavi and iniesta? what has he done for argentina? scoring goals isn't the same as carrying a team. when zidane carried a team he made sure they never lost possession, he moved them around and controlled the game all by himself.

    i've said this before and i'll say it again. messi will attempt to dribble past defenders 10 times in a match, and it will only work twice. zidane will try it 3 times, and it will work all 3 times. don't bring up stats. what about when messi tried to dribble past chelsea defenders in CL, got dispossessed and ended up conceding a goal and getting knocked out of the CL? that **** doesn't get added to the stat book

    let's not forget that the brazil team they had to beat were a lot better than any national team in today's game aswell. zidane could easily win a world cup with players like aguero, tevez, lavezzi, mascherano etc. in today's world.
    He didn't win it by himself though. Yes he played a pitival role but without the whole team pulling their own weight they wouldn't have won anything. Argentina has an amazing attack but their defence is very poor, look at Napoli they are similar in that they have an amazing attack but weak defence. Never see them winning winning anything do you?

    'scoring goals isn't the same as carrying a team' did you miss out the part where I told you he has the second highest rate of assists in the la liga? Besides he has to play a different role in the Argentina team. He is a playmaker, it's not exactly his fault if the rest of the team don't finish off chances.

    He'll dribble and it will only work twice? Ehm no it won't he very rarely loses the ball when he dribbles, that's why he is known as the greatest dribbler in the world.

    I don't know why you're trying to compare them anyway, they are two completely different types of players.

    So who do you think was greater, Zidane or Maradona?
  2. KingZizou's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 22
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by tommm)
    This is often stated, and would be quite cool if true, but sadly it isn't true.

    e.g. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/1...wsstory.sport6 56 minutes.
    "Replay suggests a bad decision"

    stfu.
  3. Akkuz's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Location: Harry Potter land
    • Posts: 7,437
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by tommm)
    This is often stated, and would be quite cool if true, but sadly it isn't true.

    e.g. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/1...wsstory.sport6 56 minutes.
    :zomg: Ok we can allow the man a few offsides. Watching him was a pure pleasure. Such elegance. He made everything look so easy.
  4. Malevolent's Avatar
    • Superbowl MVP
    • Location: Monstropolis
    • Warning points: 5
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    "Replay suggests a bad decision"

    stfu.
    two offsides that game 42nd minute and 56th
  5. michaelhaych's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,518
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    Cruyff and Van Basten never won a World Cup, neither did Puskas, Di Stefano, Platini, Best, Eusebio, Yashin, Weah, or countless others.

    George Weah, George Best and Alfredo Di Stefano never even played in a World Cup.

    Your argument is invalid.
  6. sao desi's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 30
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    Did Cryuff win a WC? Di Stefano? van Basten?

    Messi is the best player in some time IMO, but he needs to play in a more competitive league. Real and Barca are guaranteed 1st/2nd, and scoring 60 goals against largely crappy teams is immaterial. In England, the difference between our top teams and the ****ty one is far smaller than in Spain.
  7. KingZizou's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 22
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by johnharris19944)
    two offsides that game 42nd minute and 56th
    alright so zidane was offside once in his career, same thing.

    (Original post by michaelhaych)
    Cruyff and Van Basten never won a World Cup, neither did Puskas, Di Stefano, Platini, Best, Eusebio, Yashin, Weah, or countless others.

    George Weah, George Best and Alfredo Di Stefano never even played in a World Cup.

    Your argument is invalid.
    those players aren't in the same bracket as pele, maradona, zidane and fat ronaldo (who by the way have all won world cups)

    messi has played in 2 world cups (same as zidane) and has been unsuccessful in both. zidane has played 2 world cups, won one and was a finalist in the other. how much clearer can it get?
  8. KingZizou's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 22
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    zidane won balloon d'or 3 years IN A ROW back when ronaldinho, ronaldo, figo, bergkamp, henry, roberto carlos, pires etc. were still playing.

    messi has done the same thing, but who is there to challenge him? zidane did it in the golden age, messi did it in a time where there are very few world class players
  9. barnetbuzzzz's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 542
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    alright so zidane was offside once in his career, same thing.

    those players aren't in the same bracket as pele, maradona, zidane and fat ronaldo (who by the way have all won world cups)

    messi has played in 2 world cups (same as zidane) and has been unsuccessful in both. zidane has played 2 world cups, won one and was a finalist in the other. how much clearer can it get?
    You don't think Puskas, Di Stefano, Best and Eusebio are comparable to Fat Ronaldo?

    Surely the addition of "Fat" before his name pretty much sums up everything that was wrong with him? Yes he was amazing in the late 90s but was finished as a top level player before he turned 30, to suggest that the aforementioned players aren't comparable because of the piece of rock they were born on is ****ing absurd.
  10. KingZizou's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 22
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by CB91)
    Messi's game relies on his quick footwork, not pace. Messi will probably be in his prime in 2-3 years.
    this is the thing.. zidane was so great that there is no such thing as "zidane in his prime". even after retiring for 5 years he's still doing everything right and hasn't lost any of his skill.
  11. barnetbuzzzz's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 542
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    messi has done the same thing, but who is there to challenge him?
    :rofl::rofl:
    You have to be trolling.
    Xavi, Iniesta, Ronaldo, Ribery, Rooney, Robben, Drogba, Villa, Falcao....
    Seriously, just give up. Yes, Zidane was one of the GOATs. Messi may be if he carries on as he is.
  12. barnetbuzzzz's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 542
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    this is the thing.. zidane was so great that there is no such thing as "zidane in his prime". even after retiring for 5 years he's still doing everything right and hasn't lost any of his skill.
    What, based on how he performed in Soccer Aid against Ben Shepherd? :rofl::rofl:
  13. KingZizou's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 22
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by barnetbuzzzz)
    You don't think Puskas, Di Stefano, Best and Eusebio are comparable to Fat Ronaldo?
    no i don't. fat ronaldo is comparable to zinedine zidane, which says it all.

    zidane - "ronaldo is the best player i have ever seen touch a football"

    (Original post by barnetbuzzzz)
    Surely the addition of "Fat" before his name pretty much sums up everything that was wrong with him? Yes he was amazing in the late 90s but was finished as a top level player before he turned 30, to suggest that the aforementioned players aren't comparable because of the piece of rock they were born on is ****ing absurd.
    ronaldo was fat, zidane was old, yet they were still baowss
  14. michaelhaych's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,518
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    alright so zidane was offside once in his career, same thing.

    those players aren't in the same bracket as pele, maradona, zidane and fat ronaldo (who by the way have all won world cups)

    messi has played in 2 world cups (same as zidane) and has been unsuccessful in both. zidane has played 2 world cups, won one and was a finalist in the other. how much clearer can it get?
    Puskas, Van Basten, Eusebio and Di Stefano were all infinitely better than Ronaldo, go look at their goal scoring records.

    Best and Platini are just as good as Zidane.

    Zidane won a World Cup on home soil and was a finalist in a neighbouring country. Messi had to travel halfway around the World. During the 2006 World Cup, Messi was mainly used as a substitute.

    And do you remember the 2002 World Cup when a Zidane-led France finished bottom of their group with 1 point? He wasn't that good then, was he?
  15. Karaiyar's Avatar
    • Junior Member
    • Posts: 68
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    zidane won balloon d'or 3 years IN A ROW
    No he didn't..
  16. KingZizou's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 22
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by barnetbuzzzz)
    :rofl::rofl:
    You have to be trolling.
    Xavi, Iniesta, Ronaldo, Ribery, Rooney, Robben, Drogba, Villa, Falcao....
    Seriously, just give up. Yes, Zidane was one of the GOATs. Messi may be if he carries on as he is.
    you're comparing xavi, iniesta, ronaldo, robben, drogba, villa and falcao to zidane, fat ronaldo, r.carlos, figo, bergkamp, henry, ronaldinho and pires.

    just shut up man
  17. KingZizou's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 22
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by barnetbuzzzz)
    What, based on how he performed in Soccer Aid against Ben Shepherd? :rofl::rofl:
    have you watched the video? most of the things he does doesn't even depend on his opposition.

    and yeah, based on that and the fact that he alone took france to the world cup final after retirement, making ribery and malouda stars in the process
  18. barnetbuzzzz's Avatar
    • Adored and Respected Member
    • Posts: 542
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    you're comparing xavi, iniesta, ronaldo, robben, drogba, villa and falcao to zidane, fat ronaldo, r.carlos, figo, bergkamp, henry, ronaldinho and pires.

    just shut up man
    You genuinely think Pires was far better than Xavi and Iniesta?
    You said yourself that Xavi and Iniesta carry Messi for Barca.
    Stop contradicting yourself :rolleyes:
  19. Jordan_1's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 1,770
    • Warning points: 1010
    Re: This nonesense needs to stop.
    (Original post by KingZizou)
    you're comparing xavi, iniesta, ronaldo, robben, drogba, villa and falcao to zidane, fat ronaldo, r.carlos, figo, bergkamp, henry, ronaldinho and pires.

    just shut up man
    According to your logic Xavi and Iniesta should be compared to legends since they have won everything and 'carry Barcelona' as you say, a team known as the greatest in history by some.
  20. KingZizou's Avatar
    • Banned
    • Posts: 22
    • Warning points: 1000
    Re: messi cannot be considered one of the best of all time until he wins a WC
    (Original post by barnetbuzzzz)
    You genuinely think Pires was far better than Xavi and Iniesta?
    i'm saying that the players that played in the zidane era are A LOT better than the players playing in today's game in general.

    (Original post by barnetbuzzzz)
    You said yourself that Xavi and Iniesta carry Messi for Barca.

    Stop contradicting yourself :rolleyes:
    i said xavi and iniesta carry barca, yes.. where's the contradiction?

    zidane + figo > xavi + iniesta, very easily..
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Useful resources

Articles:

Click for live football commentary

Quick Link:

Unanswered Football Threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.