Trusts: Tracing Mega Confusion

Law revision, exam and homework help.

Announcements Posted on
TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning 16-05-2013
IMPORTANT: You must wait until midnight (morning exams)/4.30AM (afternoon exams) to discuss Edexcel exams and until 1pm/6pm the following day for STEP and IB exams. Please read before posting, including for rules for practical and oral exams. 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. sophie_snail's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Location: Naaarwich.
    • Posts: 256
    Trusts: Tracing Mega Confusion
    Hi guys,

    Sorry I know you're all fed up with me by now, but it'll all be over by tuesday and I can stop harassing you all!

    I'm just a bit confused with tracing at the moment... I understand the actual tracing process so we've managed to trace Bob's cow to McDonald's Farm... How do we claim this? What are the remedies available?
    I just need someone to explain in layman's terms what the hell happens now, my textbook and notes are near useless about this, except for the fact that they mention subrogation a couple of times (which I also don't understand)

    Please please please help, I promise I'll rep you for it
  2. ktwolves's Avatar
    • Respected Member
    • Posts: 196
    Re: Trusts: Tracing Mega Confusion
    trace Bob's cow to McDonald's Farm

    You mean strangers to a trust (not trustee) got hold of trust property?
    and subsequently there was change of form, windfall etc?

    Remedies? iN GENERAL The person holding the "property" must give up the "gift" because you (the fiduciary), a thief is a fiduciary in tracing, cannot transfer or give away title you doesn't own but not always (here is where the argument is, and is where you need to know).

    The good news is there are not too many scenarios, you need to go through them, and you are ready.
    Last edited by ktwolves; 27-05-2012 at 16:01.
  3. jacketpotato's Avatar
    • PS Helper
    • TSR Legend
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 11,379
    Re: Trusts: Tracing Mega Confusion
    Essentially, you assert a property right. At the end of the tracing process you have identified a piece of property as belonging to you. You say to the judge "this is my property, please make the defendant give it back".

    Subrogation is a bit different. The word "subrogation" just means you are making a claim as if you were somebody else. For the purposes of the litigation the court pretends that you are that person. For example, if you have a car accident your insurer would be "subrogated" to you. Under the terms of your insurance your insurer has the right to conduct claims as it sees fit, so it would be the insurer who decides whether to settle or fight the claim and the insurer could raise any defences or claims you could raise. It is relevant in equity because, if someone has used money which is tracable to John to pay off a charge/mortgage, we allow John to be "subrogated" to the mortgagee/chargee. We are basically pretending that John now has the charge/mortgage, he steps into the shoes of the lender.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.