Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Why do people still insist Chelsea is not a big club?

Announcements Posted on
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    They are now the 5th most succesful English club. Perhaps soon the 4th, as the prospects of Chelsea's next trophy are higher than Villa's (****, Villa could go down next season if things don't improve).

    But more to the point (or more accurately the point I truly want to make), how can people say Chelsea is not a bigger club than Tottenham?

    Twenty years ago, granted, Spurs were bigger. But Chelsea has:

    - More trophies in total
    - A larger international name, brand and fanbase (how many foreigners in their home countries wear Spurs shirts? lol.. few, if any)
    - More money
    - A Champions League, something Spurs have only ever been in twice in their history (including the old European Cup)

    Somebody will say "oh, it's cos of money they got there innit". Well, yes, money has helped. But in reality which successful team doesn't use money to advance itself? And Chelsea fans are gloryhunters? Do all Tottenham fans who've ever lived, or may live, come from Edmonton or Wood Green? lol... Like most successful clubs, Spurs' Billy Nick era brought a lot of nationally-based fans, same with Liverpool in the 70s/80s, and United under Fergie.

    I would concede that in the London/southern England hierarchy, Arsenal MAY be higher than Chelsea, but Chelsea is surely higher than Spurs now on most significant counts.

    This is tl;dr, I would grant. To suffice, as Chelsea has more tradition, it surely is a bigger club than Spurs is now.

    And to add, Chelsea may be a new big club, but so what? Was United a big club from foundation, or is it largely to the Busby era? Or Arsenal to the Chapman era? Or Liverpool to the Shankly era? Or Celtic to the nine in a row/Lisbon Lions era? the point being ALL big clubs did/achieved something to be as such.
    • 8 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Seems like you're looking for arguments. Why even make a thread about this, obviously Chelsea are a big club but people have banter and they didn't do great this season(Regarding League position)
    • 38 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    You can't pin all of Arsenal's success on something that happened 80 years ago, that's simply ludicrous.

    If that were the case, teams like Huddersfield would still be tearing it up in the top-flight.

    I don't think anyone can say Chelsea aren't a big club, and they certainly have the financial capabilities to remain as such.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    People say stuff all the time, doesn't mean they're right.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Because of Abramovich/Mansour 'oil money' men. Yes City and Chelsea are big, successful clubs but would they be without their billionaire owners? Probably not.

    I acknowledge them but don't have the same respect for City & Chelsea as I do for say Utd, Arsenal and Liverpool.
    • 8 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sleep99)
    but would they be without their billionaire ownersl.
    Yes they would because they would probably still have a rich owner. Not all big clubs have owners like them
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by marcusmerehay)
    You can't pin all of Arsenal's success on something that happened 80 years ago, that's simply ludicrous.
    How so? When most Arsenal fans acknowledge it was the Chapman era that made them a big club?
    If that were the case, teams like Huddersfield would still be tearing it up in the top-flight.
    They didn't have the same impact as Chapman's Arsenal.
    I don't think anyone can say Chelsea aren't a big club, and they certainly have the financial capabilities to remain as such.
    Apologetics, eh?
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by murpo)
    Seems like you're looking for arguments. Why even make a thread about this, obviously Chelsea are a big club but people have banter and they didn't do great this season(Regarding League position)
    Who's that in your sig (the gif)?
    • 8 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by CB91)
    Who's that in your sig (the gif)?
    daisy lowe
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Meh, I've never heard anyone claim that Spurs are a bigger club than Chelsea. :dontknow:

    What grates me though is when people suddenly reckon that Man City are one of the top 4 biggest clubs in the country because of their success in the last couple of seasons. :facepalm2: City's owners could have put any of around 30 clubs into the same position; City just got lucky.
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Hanging out at Priory Park in Reigate in Surrey today, I discovered that Manchester City are, in fact, a South London club. I never knew that.
    • 38 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sao desi)
    How so? When most Arsenal fans acknowledge it was the Chapman era that made them a big club?

    They didn't have the same impact as Chapman's Arsenal.
    Of course the Chapman era first exposed us to greatness, but there have been a number of bad patches in the club's history - we didn't win a trophy between 1953 and 1969, in a pit of mediocrity even under Billy Wright. It wasn't until the title-winning seasons of 70-71 and then again in 97-98 that we really established ourselves.

    The Huddersfield team of the late Twenties still managed three successive league titles, which only three other teams can match, as well as an FA Cup.
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by scriggy)
    Meh, I've never heard anyone claim that Chelsea are a bigger club than Spurs. :dontknow:

    What grates me though is when people suddenly reckon that Man City are one of the top 4 biggest clubs in the country because of their success in the last couple of seasons. :facepalm2: City's owners could have put any of around 30 clubs into the same position; City just got lucky.
    Why aren't they bigger than Spurs?
    • 8 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sao desi)
    Why aren't they bigger than Spurs?
    Chelsea like 1000x bigger than spurs so that can't be a debate :rofl:
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by murpo)
    daisy lowe
    I recognised her, just couldn't put a name to the face.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Because your local fanbase is not that big?

    Yes you have lots of fans in Hong Kong but could you fill a 60k stadium in West London?
    • 8 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TRS-T)
    Because your local fanbase is not that big?

    Yes you have lots of fans in Hong Kong but could you fill a 60k stadium in West London?
    Chelsea fans are ****
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Chelsea winning the champions league means sweet fa, i really think luck played a big part in your success this season. I personally don't see you winning the champions league again any time soon, unless you get some good investment, nomsayin?
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Because they give out free tickets, can't sell out a Wembley semi final and took 30,000 fans to the Champions League final
    • 8 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WheresWally)
    Chelsea winning the champions league means sweet fa, i really think luck played a big part in your success this season. I personally don't see you winning the champions league again any time soon, unless you get some good investment, nomsayin?
    Luck did play a big part but you can't say they are not a big club. They do have good investment

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 29, 2012
New on TSR

The future of apprenticeships

Join the discussion in the apprenticeships hub!

Article updates
Useful resources

Quick link:

Unanswered football threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.